Maize Response to Trinexapac-Ethyl and Nitrogen Fertilization

IF 0.8 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Planta Daninha Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s0100-83582020380100037
L. Sangoi, M. M. Durli, C. A. Souza, L. Leolato, H. F. Kuneski, A. Coelho
{"title":"Maize Response to Trinexapac-Ethyl and Nitrogen Fertilization","authors":"L. Sangoi, M. M. Durli, C. A. Souza, L. Leolato, H. F. Kuneski, A. Coelho","doi":"10.1590/s0100-83582020380100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: High nitrogen rates favor maize vegetative growth and grain yield losses due to stem lodging. The use of growth regulators can mitigate such effect. This work was carried out aiming to evaluate the effect of trinexapac ethyl on maize hybrids response to side-dress nitrogen rates. The experiment was carried out in Lages, Santa Catarina State, South of Brazil, during two growing seasons with two hybrids (P1680 and P30F53), and four nitrogen rates (0, 150, 300 and 450 kg N ha-1) were tested, with and without the presence of trinexapac ethyl. The experimental design was in randomized blocks arranged in split-split plots, with three replications per treatment. The plants height and ear insertion height, plant lodging and breaking, grain yield and yield components were evaluated. Grain yield increased in a quadratic way with increased nitrogen rate. The highest grain yields were 15,784 and 15,257 kg ha-1, in 2014/15 and 2015/16, respectively. Application rates higher than 150 kg of N ha-1, regardless of the use of the plant growth regulator, promoted maximum grain yield increases, ranging from 14.7 to 18.1%. The application of trinexapac-ethyl reduced the upper stem internode length, 1000-grain dry weight and did not affect the percentage of lodged plants and grain yield of both hybrids. Therefore, the use of trinexapac-ethyl did not enhance the maize grain yield response to increased rates of side-dress nitrogen.","PeriodicalId":20102,"journal":{"name":"Planta Daninha","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planta Daninha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT: High nitrogen rates favor maize vegetative growth and grain yield losses due to stem lodging. The use of growth regulators can mitigate such effect. This work was carried out aiming to evaluate the effect of trinexapac ethyl on maize hybrids response to side-dress nitrogen rates. The experiment was carried out in Lages, Santa Catarina State, South of Brazil, during two growing seasons with two hybrids (P1680 and P30F53), and four nitrogen rates (0, 150, 300 and 450 kg N ha-1) were tested, with and without the presence of trinexapac ethyl. The experimental design was in randomized blocks arranged in split-split plots, with three replications per treatment. The plants height and ear insertion height, plant lodging and breaking, grain yield and yield components were evaluated. Grain yield increased in a quadratic way with increased nitrogen rate. The highest grain yields were 15,784 and 15,257 kg ha-1, in 2014/15 and 2015/16, respectively. Application rates higher than 150 kg of N ha-1, regardless of the use of the plant growth regulator, promoted maximum grain yield increases, ranging from 14.7 to 18.1%. The application of trinexapac-ethyl reduced the upper stem internode length, 1000-grain dry weight and did not affect the percentage of lodged plants and grain yield of both hybrids. Therefore, the use of trinexapac-ethyl did not enhance the maize grain yield response to increased rates of side-dress nitrogen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玉米对trinexapac -乙基和氮肥的响应
摘要/ ABSTRACT摘要:高施氮量有利于玉米的营养生长和茎秆倒伏造成的产量损失。使用生长调节剂可以减轻这种影响。本试验旨在评价trinexapac乙酯对玉米杂交种侧施氮量的影响。试验在巴西南部圣卡塔琳娜州的Lages进行,在两个生长季节用两个杂交种(P1680和P30F53),在使用和不使用trinexapac ethyl的情况下,测试了四种氮肥水平(0、150、300和450 kg N ha-1)。试验设计采用随机分组,按分割区排列,每个处理重复3次。评价了株高和穗高、倒伏和断穗、籽粒产量和产量构成因素。籽粒产量随施氮量的增加呈二次曲线增长。2014/15和2015/16籽粒最高产量分别为15784和15257公斤/公顷。施氮量大于150 kg hm -1时,无论施用何种植物生长调节剂,籽粒产量增幅最大,为14.7% ~ 18.1%。施用trinexapac-乙酯后,两个杂交种的茎上节间长和千粒干重均有所减少,但对结块率和产量没有影响。因此,施用trinexapac-乙基并没有提高玉米产量对侧施氮量的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Planta Daninha
Planta Daninha Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Planta Daninha is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society of Weed Science (SBCPD - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas). Papers submitted for publication must be sent through an electronic system, on http://www.scielo.br/pd. Works may be written in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, and will be accepted after being reviewed and approved by the Editorial Board. Only papers that have not been published or submitted for publication in other media will be accepted. Articles in Portuguese will be translated to English after being properly corrected and authorized by the authors. Planta Daninha has with goal to publish genuine technical-scientific papers and literature reviews from a critical perspective on Biology, weed management, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism. Critical competition period of Parthenium hysterophorus L. in spring maize (Zea mays L.) Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil Competitive Interactions of Wild Oat ( Avena fatua L.) with Quality and Yield of Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Effect of Different Herbicides, Plant Extracts and Mulches on Yield and Yield Components of Maize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1