Relative Competitiveness Between Cultivated and Weedy Rice under Full and Low Light

IF 0.8 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Planta Daninha Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s0100-83582020380100039
C. E. Schaedler, W. Lubian, P. Lima, D. M. Chiapinotto
{"title":"Relative Competitiveness Between Cultivated and Weedy Rice under Full and Low Light","authors":"C. E. Schaedler, W. Lubian, P. Lima, D. M. Chiapinotto","doi":"10.1590/s0100-83582020380100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Cultivated and weedy rice biotypes exhibit morphophysiological variations under low light, affecting competition between plants. The aim of this study was to assess relative competitiveness between cultivated and weedy rice under full and low light. Three experiments were conducted in a greenhouse, using a completely randomized design with four repetitions. The treatments in the experiment I were arranged in additive series while in the experiments II and III treatments were arranged in replacement series. Experiments II and III were carried out concomitantly to assess coexistence between the rice cultivar and weedy rice. The treatments consisted of different plants proportions: 100:0 (cultivated rice monoculture), 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100 (weedy rice monoculture), keeping the total plant population obtained in experiment I (240 plants m-2) constant. Experiment II was conducted with full solar radiation and III under 50% light. The variables analyzed were shoot dry weight and plant height, 35 days after emergence (DAE). Competition among plants was evaluated via graphs and by interpreting competition indices. Concerning shoot dry weight, mutual losses were recorded between competitors, whereas equal competition for resources was observed for plant height. Weedy rice was more competitive than cultivated rice regardless of the light environment assessed, indicating the need for integrated methods to control this weed.","PeriodicalId":20102,"journal":{"name":"Planta Daninha","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planta Daninha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Cultivated and weedy rice biotypes exhibit morphophysiological variations under low light, affecting competition between plants. The aim of this study was to assess relative competitiveness between cultivated and weedy rice under full and low light. Three experiments were conducted in a greenhouse, using a completely randomized design with four repetitions. The treatments in the experiment I were arranged in additive series while in the experiments II and III treatments were arranged in replacement series. Experiments II and III were carried out concomitantly to assess coexistence between the rice cultivar and weedy rice. The treatments consisted of different plants proportions: 100:0 (cultivated rice monoculture), 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100 (weedy rice monoculture), keeping the total plant population obtained in experiment I (240 plants m-2) constant. Experiment II was conducted with full solar radiation and III under 50% light. The variables analyzed were shoot dry weight and plant height, 35 days after emergence (DAE). Competition among plants was evaluated via graphs and by interpreting competition indices. Concerning shoot dry weight, mutual losses were recorded between competitors, whereas equal competition for resources was observed for plant height. Weedy rice was more competitive than cultivated rice regardless of the light environment assessed, indicating the need for integrated methods to control this weed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
栽培稻与杂草稻在全光与弱光条件下的相对竞争力
摘要:栽培稻和杂草稻在弱光条件下表现出形态生理变异,影响植株间的竞争。本研究的目的是评估栽培稻和杂草稻在全光和弱光条件下的相对竞争力。三个实验在温室中进行,采用完全随机设计,重复四次。试验1采用加性串联处理,试验2和试验3采用替代串联处理。试验二和试验三同时进行,以评估该水稻品种与杂草稻的共存性。不同的株系比例分别为:100:0(栽培水稻单一栽培)、75:25、50:50、25:75和0:100(杂草水稻单一栽培),保持试验1(240株m-2)的总株系数量不变。试验二在全太阳辐射下进行,试验三在50%光照下进行。分析的变量为出苗后35 d的地上部干重和株高。植物间的竞争通过图表和竞争指数进行评价。在茎部干重方面,竞争者之间存在相互损失,而在株高方面则存在资源的平等竞争。无论光环境评价如何,杂草水稻都比栽培水稻更具竞争力,这表明需要综合方法来控制杂草。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Planta Daninha
Planta Daninha Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Planta Daninha is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society of Weed Science (SBCPD - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas). Papers submitted for publication must be sent through an electronic system, on http://www.scielo.br/pd. Works may be written in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, and will be accepted after being reviewed and approved by the Editorial Board. Only papers that have not been published or submitted for publication in other media will be accepted. Articles in Portuguese will be translated to English after being properly corrected and authorized by the authors. Planta Daninha has with goal to publish genuine technical-scientific papers and literature reviews from a critical perspective on Biology, weed management, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism. Critical competition period of Parthenium hysterophorus L. in spring maize (Zea mays L.) Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil Competitive Interactions of Wild Oat ( Avena fatua L.) with Quality and Yield of Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Effect of Different Herbicides, Plant Extracts and Mulches on Yield and Yield Components of Maize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1