Nitrogen availability and glyphosate hormesis on white oat

IF 0.8 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Planta Daninha Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s0100-83582020380100071
Diecson R.O. Silva, Álvaro A. A. Silva, Bruna D. Novello, E. Rieder, Adalin C. M. Aguiar, Claudir J. Basso
{"title":"Nitrogen availability and glyphosate hormesis on white oat","authors":"Diecson R.O. Silva, Álvaro A. A. Silva, Bruna D. Novello, E. Rieder, Adalin C. M. Aguiar, Claudir J. Basso","doi":"10.1590/s0100-83582020380100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The effect of low rates of glyphosate has been widely studied in several crops. Low nitrogen stress reduces carbohydrate synthesis and we hypothesize that hormesis from glyphosate occurs at low nitrogen availability. Objective: To evaluate the effects of glyphosate hormesis at different levels of nitrogen on the growth and yield of white oat. Methods: A two-factor factorial (2x7) was conducted in field testing at nitrogen levels (50 and 90 kg ha-1) and low rates of glyphosate rates (0 180 g a.e. ha-1). The glyphosate was applied at the second node already formed. The growth and yield were evaluated. Results: Plant height was not affected by the nitrogen levels. A low rate of glyphosate induced a plant height increase up of around 10%, but the stimulus was no maintained over in the time. Glyphosate hormesis had a greater effect on dry weight under low nitrogen than under high nitrogen conditions. The glyphosate provided a 43% increase in dry weight at a low nitrogen level when applied at rates consistent with a 4.1% field rate. Glyphosate hormesis increased the yield by approximately 30%, and the yield was higher yield under low nitrogen conditions. Conclusions: The plant height stimulus from low doses of glyphosate was not sustained over time. Glyphosate hormesis stimulus persisted and culminated in an increase in dry weight and grain yield. The hormesis effect on dry weight and yield is more pronounced under lower nitrogen availability.","PeriodicalId":20102,"journal":{"name":"Planta Daninha","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planta Daninha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The effect of low rates of glyphosate has been widely studied in several crops. Low nitrogen stress reduces carbohydrate synthesis and we hypothesize that hormesis from glyphosate occurs at low nitrogen availability. Objective: To evaluate the effects of glyphosate hormesis at different levels of nitrogen on the growth and yield of white oat. Methods: A two-factor factorial (2x7) was conducted in field testing at nitrogen levels (50 and 90 kg ha-1) and low rates of glyphosate rates (0 180 g a.e. ha-1). The glyphosate was applied at the second node already formed. The growth and yield were evaluated. Results: Plant height was not affected by the nitrogen levels. A low rate of glyphosate induced a plant height increase up of around 10%, but the stimulus was no maintained over in the time. Glyphosate hormesis had a greater effect on dry weight under low nitrogen than under high nitrogen conditions. The glyphosate provided a 43% increase in dry weight at a low nitrogen level when applied at rates consistent with a 4.1% field rate. Glyphosate hormesis increased the yield by approximately 30%, and the yield was higher yield under low nitrogen conditions. Conclusions: The plant height stimulus from low doses of glyphosate was not sustained over time. Glyphosate hormesis stimulus persisted and culminated in an increase in dry weight and grain yield. The hormesis effect on dry weight and yield is more pronounced under lower nitrogen availability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白燕麦氮素有效性与草甘膦致效
背景:低浓度草甘膦对几种作物的影响已被广泛研究。低氮胁迫减少了碳水化合物的合成,我们假设草甘膦的激效发生在低氮可用性下。目的:评价不同施氮水平草甘膦激效对白燕麦生长和产量的影响。方法:采用2 × 7双因素因子试验,在氮肥水平(50和90 kg ha-1)和低草甘膦水平(0 180 g a.e. ha-1)下进行田间试验。草甘膦应用于已经形成的第二个节点。对其生长和产量进行了评价。结果:施氮量对株高无显著影响。低剂量的草甘膦可诱导株高增加10%左右,但这种刺激在一段时间内无法维持。低氮条件下草甘膦激效对干重的影响大于高氮条件下。在低氮水平下,草甘膦的施氮量与田间施氮量4.1%一致,可使干重增加43%。草甘膦激效可使产量提高约30%,且在低氮条件下产量较高。结论:低剂量草甘膦对植物高度的刺激不能持续一段时间。草甘膦激效刺激持续存在,最终导致干重和籽粒产量增加。氮素效价较低时,对干重和产量的激效效应更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Planta Daninha
Planta Daninha Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Planta Daninha is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society of Weed Science (SBCPD - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas). Papers submitted for publication must be sent through an electronic system, on http://www.scielo.br/pd. Works may be written in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, and will be accepted after being reviewed and approved by the Editorial Board. Only papers that have not been published or submitted for publication in other media will be accepted. Articles in Portuguese will be translated to English after being properly corrected and authorized by the authors. Planta Daninha has with goal to publish genuine technical-scientific papers and literature reviews from a critical perspective on Biology, weed management, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism. Critical competition period of Parthenium hysterophorus L. in spring maize (Zea mays L.) Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil Competitive Interactions of Wild Oat ( Avena fatua L.) with Quality and Yield of Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Effect of Different Herbicides, Plant Extracts and Mulches on Yield and Yield Components of Maize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1