O processo de anistia aos bispos da Questão Religiosa: Historiografia, Direito Constitucional e Diplomacia

Jefferson de Almeida Pinto
{"title":"O processo de anistia aos bispos da Questão Religiosa: Historiografia, Direito Constitucional e Diplomacia","authors":"Jefferson de Almeida Pinto","doi":"10.15175/1984-2503-20168301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.","PeriodicalId":41789,"journal":{"name":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"426-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教问题主教的大赦程序:史学、宪法和外交
这篇文章考虑了1875年,以及19世纪70年代帝国政治阵营成员之间关于是否可能赦免涉及所谓“宗教问题”的主教的辩论。基于“共济会与超蒙坦主义”的中心对立所驱动的主题的各种文本,这是当时政治-宗教冲突的主题,我们通过考虑帝国外交的反应来研究这一事态,从根本上说,宪法的逻辑,与国务委员会和其他来源的记录有关的辩论,在“宗教问题”最紧张的年份之前和期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
LITURATERRA [2023,3] Por uma nova história das constituições Quando o espelho não é Narciso: A desconstrução das masculinidades hegemônicas nas narrativas dos professores de história Violência intrafamiliar contra crianças e adolescentes e o papel do CREAS Criminologia e literatura: O romance Via Ápia e as Unidades de Polícia Pacificadoras As ideias históricas de Bartolomé Mitre e o Brasil (1870-1880)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1