No increased risk of severe COVID-19 in asthma treated with biologics

IF 0.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14744/ejp.2022.9821
Ş. Beyaz
{"title":"No increased risk of severe COVID-19 in asthma treated with biologics","authors":"Ş. Beyaz","doi":"10.14744/ejp.2022.9821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIM: Biologics can be used safely for patients with severe asthma during the coronavirus pandemic, but there is still a lack of information regarding their effects during SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of biologic therapies on the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to assess the outcome of COVID-19 for severe asthmatics in pandemic conditions. METHODS: A total of 100 severe asthma patients treated with biologics (7 treated with dupilumab, 22 with mepolizumab, and 71 with omalizumab) were included. Patients' demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings as well as the course of the COVID-19 disease were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the total 100 patients, 15% of patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. There were no significant differences between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patient groups in terms of demographic features, atopy, comorbidity, duration of asthma, and duration of biological use. The body mass index (BMI) was higher in the SARS-CoV-2 negative group than the positive group (p=0.005). Asthma exacerbation during COVID-19 was observed in 3 patients, and only 2 were hospitalized for 5 days. SARS-CoV-2 positive group exhibited lower eosinophil and lymphocyte levels when infected with COVID-19 than before COVID-19 (p=0.01 and p=0.0009 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of COVID-19 infection was higher in patients with severe asthma receiving biologics than in the general population. However, it can be speculated that treatment with biologics may have protection against severe COVID-19 and mortality. Further studies are required to investigate the role of biologic agents, which affect the level and function of eosinophils in viral infections, especially SARS-CoV-2.","PeriodicalId":42933,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejp.2022.9821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Biologics can be used safely for patients with severe asthma during the coronavirus pandemic, but there is still a lack of information regarding their effects during SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of biologic therapies on the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to assess the outcome of COVID-19 for severe asthmatics in pandemic conditions. METHODS: A total of 100 severe asthma patients treated with biologics (7 treated with dupilumab, 22 with mepolizumab, and 71 with omalizumab) were included. Patients' demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings as well as the course of the COVID-19 disease were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the total 100 patients, 15% of patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. There were no significant differences between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patient groups in terms of demographic features, atopy, comorbidity, duration of asthma, and duration of biological use. The body mass index (BMI) was higher in the SARS-CoV-2 negative group than the positive group (p=0.005). Asthma exacerbation during COVID-19 was observed in 3 patients, and only 2 were hospitalized for 5 days. SARS-CoV-2 positive group exhibited lower eosinophil and lymphocyte levels when infected with COVID-19 than before COVID-19 (p=0.01 and p=0.0009 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of COVID-19 infection was higher in patients with severe asthma receiving biologics than in the general population. However, it can be speculated that treatment with biologics may have protection against severe COVID-19 and mortality. Further studies are required to investigate the role of biologic agents, which affect the level and function of eosinophils in viral infections, especially SARS-CoV-2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受生物制剂治疗的哮喘患者发生严重COVID-19的风险未增加
背景与目的:在冠状病毒大流行期间,生物制剂可以安全地用于严重哮喘患者,但在SARS-CoV-2感染期间,生物制剂的作用仍然缺乏信息。本研究的目的是评估生物疗法对SARS-CoV-2感染过程的影响,并评估COVID-19在大流行条件下对严重哮喘患者的预后。方法:共纳入100例使用生物制剂治疗的重症哮喘患者(dupilumab治疗7例,mepolizumab治疗22例,omalizumab治疗71例)。评估患者的人口统计学、临床和实验室结果以及COVID-19疾病的病程。结果:在100例患者中,15%的患者被诊断为COVID-19。SARS-CoV-2阳性和阴性患者组在人口统计学特征、特应性、合并症、哮喘持续时间和生物用药持续时间方面无显著差异。SARS-CoV-2阴性组体重指数(BMI)高于阳性组(p=0.005)。3例患者在新冠肺炎期间出现哮喘加重,仅有2例住院5天。SARS-CoV-2阳性组感染后嗜酸性粒细胞和淋巴细胞水平低于感染前(p=0.01和p=0.0009)。结论:接受生物制剂治疗的重症哮喘患者的COVID-19感染率高于普通人群。然而,可以推测,使用生物制剂治疗可能对COVID-19严重和死亡率有保护作用。生物制剂在病毒感染(特别是SARS-CoV-2)中影响嗜酸性粒细胞水平和功能的作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between thyroid transcription factor-1 positivity and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinoma and its prognostic significance IL-6 level but not MBL level is associated with disease severity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 Effects of one-leg exercises in rehabilitation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review Pulmonary embolism as the first sign of hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient who was cured after five years Acute Interstitial Pneumonia Associated with Vinorelbine Usage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1