Mechanisms of U-Shaped Association between Alcohol Intake and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death

Karagueuzian Hs, Demirdjian L
{"title":"Mechanisms of U-Shaped Association between Alcohol Intake and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death","authors":"Karagueuzian Hs, Demirdjian L","doi":"10.16966/2379-769X.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large cohort epidemiological studies have shown a U-shaped association between the relative risk of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) and the dose of alcohol consumed across both genders. The mechanisms of this relationship, i.e., too little or too high promoting SCD while moderate doses providing protection, remain elusive. In this brief review, we provide plausible electrophysiological and biochemical mechanisms of the U-shaped association of the dose of alcohol and the risk of SCD. At moderate doses alcohol causes partial cellular uncoupling “paradoxically” improves the conduction at narrow ventricular conducting pathways (source) that adjoins a large tissue mass (sink) eliminating preexisting Unidirectional Conduction (UCB) (from source-to-sink) and preventing re-entry formation. In contrast, higher doses of alcohol by further increasing cellular uncoupling cause conduction block at multiple ventricular sites (wavebreaks) in isolated tissues and patterned monolayers of cardiac myocytes leading to the formation of multiple reentrant and non-reentrant wave fronts simulating fibrillation-like state. In the absence of alcohol, the vulnerable narrow conducting pathways remain unchanged promoting UCB (i.e., conduction block from source-to-sink block) increasing the risk of reentry formation. Re-entry leads to Ventricular Fibrillation (VF), a major cause of SCD. Our hypothesis of U-shaped association between alcohol dose and SCD is based on the preponderance of clinical epidemiological data and on basic experimental studies using intact animal hearts and patterned monolayers of cardiac myocytes with vulnerable narrow strands of conducting pathways (source) abutting to a large tissue mass (sink). in 12 ounces of regular beer (~5% per volume alcohol), in five ounces of wine (~12% per volume alcohol) and 1.5 ounces of spirits (~40% alcohol). Therefore, up to 15 g/day is considered “light-to-moderate,” and greater than 30 g/day is considered “high” [3,4]. The potential benefits of light-to-moderate doses of alcohol consumption, however, has not received universal acceptance. A recent systematic review of epidemiological data by The Global Burden of Disease Study by Alcohol Collaborators challenged the health benefits of light-to-moderate levels of alcohol consumption. This meta-analysis concluded that the level of alcohol consumption that minimized harm “across all health outcomes particularly the risk of cancer, was zero” [10]. This seeming controversy stems from the fact that certain diseases like Atrial Fibrillation (AF), stroke, [11] hypertension, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, cancer, and liver disease do not manifest any benefit from alcohol, [5,12,13] while other diseases do. The potential mechanisms of the observed benefits of low-to-moderate alcohol consumption in CAD and SCD remain undefined because the observed epidemiologic data are associative and not causative, providing no mechanistic insight by which alcohol causes it’s beneficial or its ill effects. Since the questions that motivate Introduction It has long been recognized that acute alcohol intoxication can cause death from accidents or violence and that long-term misuse can increase the incidence of certain kinds of cancer and multi-organ diseases affecting the heart and the liver. According to a 2014 report prepared by the World Health Organization, Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health, an alcohol attributable death occurs every 10 seconds. Yet, increasing evidence suggests that regular consumption of light-to-moderate amounts of alcohol (i.e., one to one and one half standard units) can reduce the risk of Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) [1-6]. These same studies uniformly reported that higher doses of chronic alcohol consumption (>3 standard units) cancel the beneficial cardiac effects of the lower doses of alcohol, promoting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), SCD, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and heart failure [7,8]. Cardiac and multi-organ diseases induced by chronic higher doses (>3 units) of alcohol consumption result in an average of 22 years of reduction in life expectancy compared to the general population [9]. According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, one U.S. “standard” drink contains ~15 grams of pure alcohol, which is found http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2379-769X.149","PeriodicalId":91746,"journal":{"name":"Journal of heart health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of heart health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2379-769X.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large cohort epidemiological studies have shown a U-shaped association between the relative risk of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) and the dose of alcohol consumed across both genders. The mechanisms of this relationship, i.e., too little or too high promoting SCD while moderate doses providing protection, remain elusive. In this brief review, we provide plausible electrophysiological and biochemical mechanisms of the U-shaped association of the dose of alcohol and the risk of SCD. At moderate doses alcohol causes partial cellular uncoupling “paradoxically” improves the conduction at narrow ventricular conducting pathways (source) that adjoins a large tissue mass (sink) eliminating preexisting Unidirectional Conduction (UCB) (from source-to-sink) and preventing re-entry formation. In contrast, higher doses of alcohol by further increasing cellular uncoupling cause conduction block at multiple ventricular sites (wavebreaks) in isolated tissues and patterned monolayers of cardiac myocytes leading to the formation of multiple reentrant and non-reentrant wave fronts simulating fibrillation-like state. In the absence of alcohol, the vulnerable narrow conducting pathways remain unchanged promoting UCB (i.e., conduction block from source-to-sink block) increasing the risk of reentry formation. Re-entry leads to Ventricular Fibrillation (VF), a major cause of SCD. Our hypothesis of U-shaped association between alcohol dose and SCD is based on the preponderance of clinical epidemiological data and on basic experimental studies using intact animal hearts and patterned monolayers of cardiac myocytes with vulnerable narrow strands of conducting pathways (source) abutting to a large tissue mass (sink). in 12 ounces of regular beer (~5% per volume alcohol), in five ounces of wine (~12% per volume alcohol) and 1.5 ounces of spirits (~40% alcohol). Therefore, up to 15 g/day is considered “light-to-moderate,” and greater than 30 g/day is considered “high” [3,4]. The potential benefits of light-to-moderate doses of alcohol consumption, however, has not received universal acceptance. A recent systematic review of epidemiological data by The Global Burden of Disease Study by Alcohol Collaborators challenged the health benefits of light-to-moderate levels of alcohol consumption. This meta-analysis concluded that the level of alcohol consumption that minimized harm “across all health outcomes particularly the risk of cancer, was zero” [10]. This seeming controversy stems from the fact that certain diseases like Atrial Fibrillation (AF), stroke, [11] hypertension, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, cancer, and liver disease do not manifest any benefit from alcohol, [5,12,13] while other diseases do. The potential mechanisms of the observed benefits of low-to-moderate alcohol consumption in CAD and SCD remain undefined because the observed epidemiologic data are associative and not causative, providing no mechanistic insight by which alcohol causes it’s beneficial or its ill effects. Since the questions that motivate Introduction It has long been recognized that acute alcohol intoxication can cause death from accidents or violence and that long-term misuse can increase the incidence of certain kinds of cancer and multi-organ diseases affecting the heart and the liver. According to a 2014 report prepared by the World Health Organization, Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health, an alcohol attributable death occurs every 10 seconds. Yet, increasing evidence suggests that regular consumption of light-to-moderate amounts of alcohol (i.e., one to one and one half standard units) can reduce the risk of Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) [1-6]. These same studies uniformly reported that higher doses of chronic alcohol consumption (>3 standard units) cancel the beneficial cardiac effects of the lower doses of alcohol, promoting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), SCD, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and heart failure [7,8]. Cardiac and multi-organ diseases induced by chronic higher doses (>3 units) of alcohol consumption result in an average of 22 years of reduction in life expectancy compared to the general population [9]. According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, one U.S. “standard” drink contains ~15 grams of pure alcohol, which is found http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2379-769X.149
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精摄入与心源性猝死风险之间u型关系的机制
大型队列流行病学研究表明,无论男女,心源性猝死(SCD)的相对风险与饮酒剂量之间呈u型关系。这种关系的机制,即过少或过高的剂量促进SCD,而适度剂量提供保护,仍然难以捉摸。在这篇简短的综述中,我们提供了酒精剂量与SCD风险呈u型关系的合理的电生理和生化机制。在中等剂量下,酒精引起部分细胞解耦,“矛盾地”改善了与大组织块(库)相邻的狭窄心室传导通路(源)的传导,消除了先前存在的单向传导(UCB)(从源到库)并防止重新进入形成。相反,高剂量的酒精通过进一步增加细胞解偶联导致分离组织中多个心室部位的传导阻滞(波断)和心肌细胞的模式单层,导致形成多个重入和非重入波前,模拟纤颤样状态。在没有酒精的情况下,脆弱的狭窄传导通路保持不变,促进了UCB(即从源到汇的传导阻滞),增加了再入形成的风险。再入导致心室颤动(VF),这是SCD的主要原因。我们的酒精剂量与SCD之间呈u型关系的假设是基于临床流行病学数据的优势,以及使用完整动物心脏和心肌细胞单层的基础实验研究,这些心肌细胞具有脆弱的窄链传导通路(源),毗邻大组织块(库)。12盎司普通啤酒(每体积酒精含量约为5%),5盎司葡萄酒(每体积酒精含量约为12%)和1.5盎司烈酒(酒精含量约为40%)。因此,高达15克/天被认为是“轻度至中度”,超过30克/天被认为是“高”[3,4]。然而,少量到中等剂量饮酒的潜在益处尚未得到普遍认可。由酒精合作者进行的全球疾病负担研究最近对流行病学数据进行了系统回顾,对轻度至中度饮酒的健康益处提出了质疑。这项荟萃分析得出的结论是,将“所有健康结果,尤其是癌症风险”降至最低的酒精消费水平为零。这种表面上的争议源于这样一个事实,即某些疾病,如房颤(AF)、中风、bb0高血压、心力衰竭、心肌病、癌症和肝病,并没有从酒精中表现出任何益处,[5,12,13]而其他疾病则有。观察到的低至中度饮酒对冠心病和SCD有益的潜在机制仍不明确,因为观察到的流行病学数据是相关的,而不是因果的,没有提供酒精导致其有益或有害影响的机制见解。人们早就认识到,急性酒精中毒可导致事故或暴力致死,长期滥用可增加某些类型的癌症和影响心脏和肝脏的多器官疾病的发病率。根据世界卫生组织2014年编写的《酒精与健康全球现状报告》,每10秒钟就有一人因酒精导致死亡。然而,越来越多的证据表明,经常饮用少量至适量的酒精(即1至1.5标准单位)可以降低缺血性心脏病(IHD)和心源性猝死(SCD)的风险[1-6]。这些相同的研究一致报道,高剂量的慢性饮酒(bbb30标准单位)抵消了低剂量酒精对心脏的有益作用,促进冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、SCD、心肌病、高血压和心力衰竭[7,8]。与一般人群相比,长期高剂量饮酒(3个单位)引起的心脏和多器官疾病导致预期寿命平均减少22年。根据美国国家酒精滥用和酒精中毒研究所的数据,一杯美国“标准”饮料含有~15克纯酒精,其含量为http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2379-769X.149
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential Antihyperlipidemic Effect of Edaravone against Triton X-100 and High Fat Diet (HFD) Induced Experimental Model of Hyperlipidemia in Rats Point of Care Ultrasound Diagnosis of Perioperative Sepsis Shock Prevalence and Factors Associated with Major Arrhythmias and Conduction Abnormalities in Tanzanian Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy eleterious Effect of Westernized Diet Pattern, Red Meat and High Salt Intake on Left Ventricular Structure and Function in Hypertensive Black Sub-Saharan Africans: A Multicentric Cross Sectional Study Doppler Ultrasound Evaluation of Patients with Popliteal Vascular Entrapment Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1