Predictable information literacy misconceptions of first-year college students

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Communications in Information Literacy Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.15760/COMMINFOLIT.2018.12.1.2
L. Hinchliffe, A. Rand, Jill Collier
{"title":"Predictable information literacy misconceptions of first-year college students","authors":"L. Hinchliffe, A. Rand, Jill Collier","doi":"10.15760/COMMINFOLIT.2018.12.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of learning includes not only success in developing knowledge, skills, and abilities but also mistakes and errors that impede such success. In any domain of learning, instructors will have developed a sense of the typical errors learners make; however, there has been no systematic investigation and documentation of predictable misunderstandings in information literacy learning in higher education. This study begins to fill that gap. Through an analysis of survey responses and focus groups, the researchers identified nine information literacy misconceptions and developed a model framework of information literacy misconceptions. The article concludes by proposing learning outcomes that could counter the misconceptions.","PeriodicalId":44439,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Information Literacy","volume":"12 1","pages":"4-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Information Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15760/COMMINFOLIT.2018.12.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The process of learning includes not only success in developing knowledge, skills, and abilities but also mistakes and errors that impede such success. In any domain of learning, instructors will have developed a sense of the typical errors learners make; however, there has been no systematic investigation and documentation of predictable misunderstandings in information literacy learning in higher education. This study begins to fill that gap. Through an analysis of survey responses and focus groups, the researchers identified nine information literacy misconceptions and developed a model framework of information literacy misconceptions. The article concludes by proposing learning outcomes that could counter the misconceptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学一年级学生可预测的信息素养误解
学习的过程不仅包括发展知识、技能和能力的成功,也包括阻碍这种成功的错误和错误。在任何学习领域,教师都会对学习者所犯的典型错误有所了解;然而,对于高等教育中信息素养学习中可预见的误解,目前还没有系统的调查和文献记录。这项研究开始填补这一空白。通过对调查反馈和焦点小组的分析,研究人员确定了九种信息素养误解,并建立了信息素养误解的模型框架。文章最后提出了可以消除误解的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communications in Information Literacy
Communications in Information Literacy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications in Information Literacy (CIL) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to advancing research, theory, and practice in the area of information literacy in higher education. CIL is independently published. Furthermore, it is open access in the truest sense; there are no article processing charges or other regressive publication fees. The editors of CIL are solely committed to the investigation of various models and theories of information literacy worldwide, and they remain faithful to principles of open access for academic research.
期刊最新文献
Truth or Consequences: Academic Instruction Librarians as Information Literacy and Critical Thinking Activists Quality Matters: Using a Peer-Review Process to Create a Cohesive Multi-Campus Library Online Instruction Program Investigating Faculty Perceptions of Information Literacy and Instructional Collaboration Expanding on the Frames: Making a Case for Algorithmic Literacy Information Literacy in English-Language Higher Education Teaching Journals: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1