Sweetness or Mouthfeel: A corpus-based study of the conceptualization of taste

IF 0.4 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Research Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.001
Yingru Zhong, Chu-Ren Huang
{"title":"Sweetness or Mouthfeel: A corpus-based study of the conceptualization of taste","authors":"Yingru Zhong, Chu-Ren Huang","doi":"10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zhong, Yin and Chu-Ren Huang. 2020. Sweetness or Mouthfeel: A corpus-based study of the conceptualization of taste. Linguistic Research 37(3): 359-387. The sensory lexicon plays a pivotal role in bridging our cognitive system to the physical world. In this role, it has been the focus of recent interdisciplinary investigations on cognition, language, culture, and their interactions. Recent studies on linguistic synesthesia and sensory modality exclusivity showed unequivocally that cross-modality usages of sensory words are the norm rather than the exception. Given the dominance of cross-modality uses, the null hypothesis that the five senses are separate but equal modules merits a closer examination. In this paper, we focus on the gustatory quality of sweetness because of its universal appeal as well as the well-attested cultural influence on the gustatory lexicon. Based on an analysis of online food reviews containing descriptions of desserts, we show that mouthfeel, a multisensory concept, is strongly preferred over sweetness. Mouthfeel is associated with words from all the sensory domains, including both sensory and abstract (e.g., mental state) concepts. The highly non-exclusive characteristic of gustatory sensation suggests that it might be the most connected sensory modality, and the cross-modality expressions indicating personal preferences further imply the subjective propensity of the gustatory sense. Our study adds to the existing literature the interrelationship among sensory modalities through language use, and further sheds light on the interactions between language, cognition, and culture. (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.37.3.202012.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Zhong, Yin and Chu-Ren Huang. 2020. Sweetness or Mouthfeel: A corpus-based study of the conceptualization of taste. Linguistic Research 37(3): 359-387. The sensory lexicon plays a pivotal role in bridging our cognitive system to the physical world. In this role, it has been the focus of recent interdisciplinary investigations on cognition, language, culture, and their interactions. Recent studies on linguistic synesthesia and sensory modality exclusivity showed unequivocally that cross-modality usages of sensory words are the norm rather than the exception. Given the dominance of cross-modality uses, the null hypothesis that the five senses are separate but equal modules merits a closer examination. In this paper, we focus on the gustatory quality of sweetness because of its universal appeal as well as the well-attested cultural influence on the gustatory lexicon. Based on an analysis of online food reviews containing descriptions of desserts, we show that mouthfeel, a multisensory concept, is strongly preferred over sweetness. Mouthfeel is associated with words from all the sensory domains, including both sensory and abstract (e.g., mental state) concepts. The highly non-exclusive characteristic of gustatory sensation suggests that it might be the most connected sensory modality, and the cross-modality expressions indicating personal preferences further imply the subjective propensity of the gustatory sense. Our study adds to the existing literature the interrelationship among sensory modalities through language use, and further sheds light on the interactions between language, cognition, and culture. (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甜味或口感:一项基于语料库的味觉概念化研究
黄楚仁,尹忠。2020。甜味或口感:一项基于语料库的味觉概念化研究。语言研究37(3):359-387。感官词汇在连接我们的认知系统和物理世界方面起着关键作用。在这个角色中,它一直是最近关于认知、语言、文化及其相互作用的跨学科研究的焦点。最近关于语言联觉和感觉情态排他性的研究明确表明,感觉词的跨情态使用是常态而不是例外。鉴于跨情态使用的主导地位,五种感觉是独立但平等的模块的零假设值得更仔细的检查。在本文中,我们将重点关注甜味的味觉品质,因为它具有普遍的吸引力,以及对味觉词汇的充分证明的文化影响。基于对包含甜点描述的在线食物评论的分析,我们表明口感,一个多感官的概念,比甜味更受欢迎。口感与所有感官领域的词汇有关,包括感官和抽象(如精神状态)概念。味觉感觉的高度非排他性表明它可能是联系最紧密的感觉模态,而表明个人偏好的跨模态表达进一步暗示了味觉的主观倾向。我们的研究在现有文献的基础上增加了语言使用中感官形态之间的相互关系,并进一步揭示了语言、认知和文化之间的相互作用。(香港理工大学)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Research
Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.
期刊最新文献
Overt subject NPs as a contrast marker in Korean discourse Keyword analyses of English charter parties How do speakers of different languages differ in the encoding of complex motion events Revisiting the persuade-constructions in Korean with empirical evidence Loanword adaptation of English coronal fricatives into Mandarin Chinese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1