{"title":"Should didactic methods be subject of institutional policy? Reflections of a retired teacher","authors":"Jochanan Benbas","doi":"10.15761/HEC.1000168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical schools are replacing the traditional \"teacher-centered\" instruction that casts students as passive recipients of lectures by \"learner-centered\" methods that entail student involvement. Some schools have adopted learner-centered methods as institutional policy. Objective: To describe the author's teaching approaches at two Israeli medical schools in the 1970s - 1990s, and explore the pros and cons of a policy that requires from faculty to use a single teaching method. Observations: Students were interested in lectures that summarized clinical knowledge and in experiences aimed at imparting clinical skills . However, students appeared to be bored by lectures that they perceived as clinically irrelevant , or as preaching values . In such domains challenging small groups of students to cope with a specific task was more effective in achieving the learning objective. Implications: Different topics may require different teaching methods. The author proposes to familiarize faculty with the strengths and weaknesses of lectures, flipped classrooms, problem- and inquiry-based learning; develop guidelines for assessing the effectiveness of these teaching methods; and encourage faculty to choose the method with which they feel comfortable, and which they consider optimal for the subject to be taught.","PeriodicalId":93179,"journal":{"name":"Health education and care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/HEC.1000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Medical schools are replacing the traditional "teacher-centered" instruction that casts students as passive recipients of lectures by "learner-centered" methods that entail student involvement. Some schools have adopted learner-centered methods as institutional policy. Objective: To describe the author's teaching approaches at two Israeli medical schools in the 1970s - 1990s, and explore the pros and cons of a policy that requires from faculty to use a single teaching method. Observations: Students were interested in lectures that summarized clinical knowledge and in experiences aimed at imparting clinical skills . However, students appeared to be bored by lectures that they perceived as clinically irrelevant , or as preaching values . In such domains challenging small groups of students to cope with a specific task was more effective in achieving the learning objective. Implications: Different topics may require different teaching methods. The author proposes to familiarize faculty with the strengths and weaknesses of lectures, flipped classrooms, problem- and inquiry-based learning; develop guidelines for assessing the effectiveness of these teaching methods; and encourage faculty to choose the method with which they feel comfortable, and which they consider optimal for the subject to be taught.