The Comparison between National Final Examination Test Items and English Teacher Made-Test Items of 2010 and 2011

AlTalim Pub Date : 2015-02-13 DOI:10.15548/JT.V22I1.116
Khairil Razali, Miftahul Jannah
{"title":"The Comparison between National Final Examination Test Items and English Teacher Made-Test Items of 2010 and 2011","authors":"Khairil Razali, Miftahul Jannah","doi":"10.15548/JT.V22I1.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the paper is to determine the relevance between the scope of the national final examination test items in English lesson and the English teacher made test items. It is also to identify the relevance between the deepness of national final examination test items in English subject and the English teacher made test item. The finding showed that  more than fifty percents of tryout out test items are not relevant with the national test items. Meanwhile, the final national test items were design with higher cognitive domain than teacher made test items. It means the teacher made test items (tryout) is more superficial than final national test items. It can be a reason why the students who are can pass the tryout test which is made in teacher cannot pass the national final examination test (standardized test). It is expected that this study provides empirical evidence to devise on their optimal uses in EFL teaching.  Copyright © 2015 by Al-Ta'lim All right reserved","PeriodicalId":30614,"journal":{"name":"AlTalim","volume":"22 1","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlTalim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/JT.V22I1.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to determine the relevance between the scope of the national final examination test items in English lesson and the English teacher made test items. It is also to identify the relevance between the deepness of national final examination test items in English subject and the English teacher made test item. The finding showed that  more than fifty percents of tryout out test items are not relevant with the national test items. Meanwhile, the final national test items were design with higher cognitive domain than teacher made test items. It means the teacher made test items (tryout) is more superficial than final national test items. It can be a reason why the students who are can pass the tryout test which is made in teacher cannot pass the national final examination test (standardized test). It is expected that this study provides empirical evidence to devise on their optimal uses in EFL teaching.  Copyright © 2015 by Al-Ta'lim All right reserved
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010年和2011年全国期末考试试题与英语教师自编试题的比较
本文的目的是确定英语课中国家期末考试试题范围与英语教师所做试题的相关性。也是为了识别英语学科国家期末考试试题深度与英语教师所做试题的相关性。调查结果显示,超过50%的选拔考试项目与国家考试项目不相关。同时,国家终题设计的认知域高于教师自编试题。这意味着老师制定的测试项目(选拔)比最终的国家测试项目更肤浅。这可能是学生能够通过教师进行的试考而不能通过国家期末考试(标准化考试)的原因。期望本研究能为其在英语教学中的最佳运用提供实证依据。版权所有©2015 Al-Ta'lim
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Self-Assessment in Exploring EFL Students’ Speaking Skill Empowering Education: Exploring Teachers’ Classroom Practices in Vocational Schools The Use of Small Group Discussion and Snowballing Techniques: An Effort to enhance EFL Students’ Self –Efficacy and Speaking Skill The Assessment of the Education Laboratory Performance by Using Balanced Score Card Method The Content Mastery among Islamic Education Teachers in Junior Islamic Secondary Schools in Surakarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1