Medical students’ perceptions towards e-cigarettes: highlighting the gap in universities’ curricula

P. Ferrara, J. M. Ramon-Torrell, C. Masuet-Aumatell
{"title":"Medical students’ perceptions towards e-cigarettes: highlighting the gap in universities’ curricula","authors":"P. Ferrara, J. M. Ramon-Torrell, C. Masuet-Aumatell","doi":"10.15761/hec.1000165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite use of electronic cigarettes is having an increasingly disturbing proportion, limited attention has been paid to investigate knowledge of healthcare professionals and medical students towards it use, as well as medical curricula do not include specific training on this topic. The aim of the present study was to assess the level of perception, knowledge, and awareness towards electronic cigarettes amongst medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of students of the School of Medicine of University of Barcelona, Spain, between September and December 2017. Results: A total of 159 medical students returned the survey, being the majority female (82.4%) and first year students (79.9%). The 84.7% of interviewees never smoked, the 5.7% were former smoker, and the remaining 9.6% were current smokers. Responses to the questions about knowledge and awareness towards electronic cigarettes highlighted sub-optimal levels throughout the sample. The vast majority (87.4%) answered that ECs can generate addiction. Regarding EC use as smoking cessation method, only the 35.2% indicated ECs to be an effective. None of the collected characteristics was found as significantly associated with students’ level of knowledge and perceptions. Conclusions: As students are nowadays asked to build a complete passport of their medical skills, reviewing existing training programmes is necessary to address correct knowledge about this topic, also by implementing most effective educational paradigms applicable in school of medicine. *Correspondence to: Josep Maria Ramon-Torrell, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Preventive Medicine Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Catalonia, Spain, E-mail: jmramon@ub.edu","PeriodicalId":93179,"journal":{"name":"Health education and care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/hec.1000165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite use of electronic cigarettes is having an increasingly disturbing proportion, limited attention has been paid to investigate knowledge of healthcare professionals and medical students towards it use, as well as medical curricula do not include specific training on this topic. The aim of the present study was to assess the level of perception, knowledge, and awareness towards electronic cigarettes amongst medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of students of the School of Medicine of University of Barcelona, Spain, between September and December 2017. Results: A total of 159 medical students returned the survey, being the majority female (82.4%) and first year students (79.9%). The 84.7% of interviewees never smoked, the 5.7% were former smoker, and the remaining 9.6% were current smokers. Responses to the questions about knowledge and awareness towards electronic cigarettes highlighted sub-optimal levels throughout the sample. The vast majority (87.4%) answered that ECs can generate addiction. Regarding EC use as smoking cessation method, only the 35.2% indicated ECs to be an effective. None of the collected characteristics was found as significantly associated with students’ level of knowledge and perceptions. Conclusions: As students are nowadays asked to build a complete passport of their medical skills, reviewing existing training programmes is necessary to address correct knowledge about this topic, also by implementing most effective educational paradigms applicable in school of medicine. *Correspondence to: Josep Maria Ramon-Torrell, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Preventive Medicine Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Catalonia, Spain, E-mail: jmramon@ub.edu
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生对电子烟的看法:强调大学课程的差距
背景:尽管使用电子烟的比例越来越令人不安,但调查医疗保健专业人员和医学生对电子烟使用的知识的关注有限,而且医学课程没有包括关于这一主题的具体培训。本研究的目的是评估医学生对电子烟的认知、知识和意识水平。方法:于2017年9月至12月对西班牙巴塞罗那大学医学院的学生进行横断面研究。结果:共有159名医学生返回调查,以女生(82.4%)和一年级学生(79.9%)居多。84.7%的受访者从不吸烟,5.7%曾经吸烟,其余9.6%目前仍在吸烟。对电子烟知识和意识问题的回答强调了整个样本的次优水平。绝大多数人(87.4%)回答说ECs会使人上瘾。至于使用电子烟作为戒烟方法,只有35.2%的受访者认为电子烟有效。所收集的特征中没有发现与学生的知识水平和认知水平有显著关联。结论:由于现在要求学生建立其医疗技能的完整护照,审查现有的培训方案是必要的,以解决关于这一主题的正确知识,并通过实施适用于医学院的最有效的教育范式。*通信对象:Josep Maria Ramon-Torrell, Bellvitge生物医学研究所(IDIBELL), Bellvitge大学医院预防医学科,Feixa Llarga s/n, L 'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Catalonia, Spain, E-mail: jmramon@ub.edu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The dissection theatre of the future is already in routine operation How do clinical staff in a large metropolitan hospital respond to disclosures of family violence? Genetic approach in personalized medicine in type 2 diabetes Final year medical and social worker student's socio-political & religious backgrounds compared to the general public: The person-in-the-professional From clinical guidelines to clinical care -- employee involvement makes a positive difference to implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1