Is localized soil tillage in the planting row a sustainable alternative for sugarcane cultivation?

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Bragantia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-4499.20220115
B. H. S. Mazaron, A. P. Coelho, C. Fernandes
{"title":"Is localized soil tillage in the planting row a sustainable alternative for sugarcane cultivation?","authors":"B. H. S. Mazaron, A. P. Coelho, C. Fernandes","doi":"10.1590/1678-4499.20220115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical quality of the soils by evaluating the variation of soil penetration resistance, resulting from tillage with chiseling in the planting row and in total area, and the possible interferences of the managements in sugarcane yield. The study was carried out in southeastern Brazil, in areas under Oxisol and Ultisol, which are the two soils with the greatest representativeness of sugarcane cultivation in the country. The treatments consisted of soil tillage in total area and localized tillage in the sugarcane planting row, with 10 replicates. Undisturbed soil samples were collected in the 0-0.10, 0.10-0.20, and 0.20-0.40-m soil layers in sugarcane rows and interrows in both soil types for penetration resistance determination in laboratory. Samplings were carried out at three times, the first after soil tillage, the second after sugarcane planting, and the third six months after planting. Compared to the system with tillage in total area, localized tillage promoted higher values of soil penetration resistance in sugarcane interrows. However, this was not enough to reduce the crop yield. In the planting row, there are no differences between tillage types for soil penetration resistance. Localized soil tillage in sugarcane crop is a conservation and sustainable alternative that can replace soil tillage in total area, not interfering in the PR determined in the crop row and not altering the stem yield, regardless of the soil type.","PeriodicalId":9260,"journal":{"name":"Bragantia","volume":"243 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bragantia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20220115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical quality of the soils by evaluating the variation of soil penetration resistance, resulting from tillage with chiseling in the planting row and in total area, and the possible interferences of the managements in sugarcane yield. The study was carried out in southeastern Brazil, in areas under Oxisol and Ultisol, which are the two soils with the greatest representativeness of sugarcane cultivation in the country. The treatments consisted of soil tillage in total area and localized tillage in the sugarcane planting row, with 10 replicates. Undisturbed soil samples were collected in the 0-0.10, 0.10-0.20, and 0.20-0.40-m soil layers in sugarcane rows and interrows in both soil types for penetration resistance determination in laboratory. Samplings were carried out at three times, the first after soil tillage, the second after sugarcane planting, and the third six months after planting. Compared to the system with tillage in total area, localized tillage promoted higher values of soil penetration resistance in sugarcane interrows. However, this was not enough to reduce the crop yield. In the planting row, there are no differences between tillage types for soil penetration resistance. Localized soil tillage in sugarcane crop is a conservation and sustainable alternative that can replace soil tillage in total area, not interfering in the PR determined in the crop row and not altering the stem yield, regardless of the soil type.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植行局部土壤耕作是甘蔗种植的可持续替代方案吗?
本研究的目的是评价土壤的物理质量,通过评价土壤在种植行和总面积上因凿凿耕作而产生的土壤抗渗透变化,以及管理对甘蔗产量可能产生的干扰。这项研究是在巴西东南部的Oxisol和Ultisol土壤下进行的,这是该国甘蔗种植最具代表性的两种土壤。处理分为全面积土壤耕作和甘蔗种植行局部耕作,每组10个重复。在两种土壤类型的甘蔗行间0-0.10、0.10-0.20和0.20-0.40 m土层采集未扰动土壤样品,进行实验室渗透阻力测定。取样分三次进行,第一次在土壤耕作后,第二次在甘蔗种植后,第三次在种植后六个月。与全面积耕作相比,局部耕作提高了甘蔗间作土壤抗渗透能力。然而,这并不足以降低作物产量。在种植行中,不同耕作方式对土壤抗渗透能力没有差异。甘蔗作物的局部土壤耕作是一种保护和可持续的替代方法,可以在总面积上替代土壤耕作,不干扰作物行内确定的PR,不改变茎产量,无论土壤类型如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bragantia
Bragantia AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Bragantia é uma revista de ciências agronômicas editada pelo Instituto Agronômico da Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, da Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, com o objetivo de publicar trabalhos científicos originais que contribuam para o desenvolvimento das ciências agronômicas. A revista é publicada desde 1941, tornando-se semestral em 1984, quadrimestral em 2001 e trimestral em 2005. É filiada à Associação Brasileira de Editores Científicos (ABEC).
期刊最新文献
Corn straw return effectively improves the stability and increases the carbon and nitrogen contents of waterstable aggregates in northeastern China black soil Spermine decreases ethylene and increases sugars and phenolic compounds in nasturtium flowers grown under drought and salt stress Genetic divergence for seed traits in Passiflora full-sib families under recurrent selection for resistance to the cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado Training systems improved agronomic characteristics and quality of ‘Niagara Rosada’ table grapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1