Splints and immobilisation approaches used for second to fifth metacarpal fractures: a systematic review

M. Keller, R. Barnes, C. Brandt, L. Hepworth
{"title":"Splints and immobilisation approaches used for second to fifth metacarpal fractures: a systematic review","authors":"M. Keller, R. Barnes, C. Brandt, L. Hepworth","doi":"10.17159/2309-8309/2022/v21n2a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The second to fifth metacarpal fractures are immobilised with splints, plaster of Paris (POP) or buddy strapping for a period of time. However, no recent evidence-based splinting and immobilisation programme exists for the management thereof, leaving a gap in the literature to inform clinical practice. This review aimed to review, appraise and collate the literature on splints and immobilisation approaches used for second to fifth metacarpal fractures after surgical and conservative management in adults aged 20 to 59 years. METHODS: The review included experimental study designs, quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies and case-control studies from January 2008 to September 2018. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, appraised and extracted data from the included studies. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guided the reporting. Joanna Briggs Institute (jBl) critical appraisal tools were used to assess the risk of bias for each included study. RESULTS: Database searches generated 1 005 articles with ten additional articles found on Google Scholar. Ten articles were included: two randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one quasi-RCT, four prospective studies, one retrospective record review, one retrospective study and one comparative study with descriptive reporting of the results. CONCLUSION: High level 1b evidence suggests that no reduction, a soft wrap and buddy strapping for three weeks with early active finger and wrist mobilisation are effective for individuals who sustained boxer's fractures with < 70° angulation. To guide clinical practice, high-level research is needed to determine the immobilisation of second to fifth metacarpal fracture types. Level of evidence: Level 2","PeriodicalId":32220,"journal":{"name":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2022/v21n2a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The second to fifth metacarpal fractures are immobilised with splints, plaster of Paris (POP) or buddy strapping for a period of time. However, no recent evidence-based splinting and immobilisation programme exists for the management thereof, leaving a gap in the literature to inform clinical practice. This review aimed to review, appraise and collate the literature on splints and immobilisation approaches used for second to fifth metacarpal fractures after surgical and conservative management in adults aged 20 to 59 years. METHODS: The review included experimental study designs, quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies and case-control studies from January 2008 to September 2018. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, appraised and extracted data from the included studies. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guided the reporting. Joanna Briggs Institute (jBl) critical appraisal tools were used to assess the risk of bias for each included study. RESULTS: Database searches generated 1 005 articles with ten additional articles found on Google Scholar. Ten articles were included: two randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one quasi-RCT, four prospective studies, one retrospective record review, one retrospective study and one comparative study with descriptive reporting of the results. CONCLUSION: High level 1b evidence suggests that no reduction, a soft wrap and buddy strapping for three weeks with early active finger and wrist mobilisation are effective for individuals who sustained boxer's fractures with < 70° angulation. To guide clinical practice, high-level research is needed to determine the immobilisation of second to fifth metacarpal fracture types. Level of evidence: Level 2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夹板和固定方法用于第二至第五掌骨骨折:系统回顾
背景:第二至第五掌骨骨折用夹板、巴黎石膏(POP)或好友绑带固定一段时间。然而,最近没有基于证据的夹板和固定方案存在于其管理中,在文献中留下空白,以告知临床实践。本综述旨在回顾、评估和整理关于夹板和固定入路用于20 - 59岁成人手术和保守治疗后第二至第五掌骨骨折的文献。方法:纳入2008年1月至2018年9月的实验研究设计、准实验研究、队列研究和病例对照研究。两位审稿人独立筛选、选择、评价和提取纳入研究的数据。系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目指导了报告。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(jBl)的关键评估工具来评估每个纳入研究的偏倚风险。结果:数据库搜索产生了1005篇文章,另外在谷歌Scholar上发现了10篇文章。纳入10篇文章:2篇随机对照试验(rct)、1篇准rct、4篇前瞻性研究、1篇回顾性记录综述、1篇回顾性研究和1篇描述性结果比较研究。结论:高水平1b证据表明,对于持续的拳击手骨折< 70°角度的患者,不复位,软包和好友绑扎三周,早期活动手指和手腕活动是有效的。为了指导临床实践,需要高水平的研究来确定第二至第五掌骨骨折类型的固定。证据等级:二级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SA Orthopaedic Journal
SA Orthopaedic Journal Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Fassier technique for correction of proximal femoral deformity in children with osteogenesis imperfecta Factors associated with dissemination and complications of acute bone and joint infections in children Low dislocation rate one year after total hip arthroplasty at a tertiary hospital in South Africa Functional outcome of free fibula grafting in benign non-reconstructable bone tumours involving the hand A survey on the educational value of an mHealth referral app for orthopaedics in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1