Quantitative assessment of Muscle stiffness using Tensiomyography before and after Injection of Botulinum toxin Type A in Patients after Stroke

Y. Mikami, Kai Ushio, A. Matsumoto, K. Kouda, Hiroaki Kimura, N. Adachi
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of Muscle stiffness using Tensiomyography before and after Injection of Botulinum toxin Type A in Patients after Stroke","authors":"Y. Mikami, Kai Ushio, A. Matsumoto, K. Kouda, Hiroaki Kimura, N. Adachi","doi":"10.15761/pmrr.1000208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muscle spasticity after stroke causes pain and decrease of activities of daily living (ADL), and is one of the causes of decreasing Quality of life (QOL) and social participation of the patients. Botulinum toxin is a neurotoxin produced by Clostridium botulinum, and type A is the most stable and toxic [1]. In 1977, Scott [2] first applied botulinum toxin type A (BTA) clinically for strabismus, and was also used for the treatment of blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, and spastic torticollis. In recent years, BTA has become widely applied as a treatment for muscle spasticity after stroke, and there have been many reports that said BTA treatment is a safe and effective treatment [3-5]. BTA cleaves the SNAP25 protein involved in the release of acetylcholine within nerve endings at the neuromuscular junction. Thereby, the release of acetylcholine is suppressed, and the neuromuscular transmission is suppressed to obtain muscular relaxation. Neurons in which neuromuscular transmission has been inhibited are reopened several months later due to the formation of a nerve branch from the axonal side, and the muscular relaxation disappears [6]. The effect of BTA treatment on muscle spasticity is generally assessed using the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). However, the evaluation by MAS is less objective and has differences among the examiners, and MAS is not highly reliable [7-9]. Therefore, there have been few objective outcome measures regarding the effect of BTA treatment, and the optimal dose, duration of the effect, and the interval of re-administration of BTA have not been clarified.","PeriodicalId":92704,"journal":{"name":"Physical medicine and rehabilitation research","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical medicine and rehabilitation research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/pmrr.1000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Muscle spasticity after stroke causes pain and decrease of activities of daily living (ADL), and is one of the causes of decreasing Quality of life (QOL) and social participation of the patients. Botulinum toxin is a neurotoxin produced by Clostridium botulinum, and type A is the most stable and toxic [1]. In 1977, Scott [2] first applied botulinum toxin type A (BTA) clinically for strabismus, and was also used for the treatment of blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, and spastic torticollis. In recent years, BTA has become widely applied as a treatment for muscle spasticity after stroke, and there have been many reports that said BTA treatment is a safe and effective treatment [3-5]. BTA cleaves the SNAP25 protein involved in the release of acetylcholine within nerve endings at the neuromuscular junction. Thereby, the release of acetylcholine is suppressed, and the neuromuscular transmission is suppressed to obtain muscular relaxation. Neurons in which neuromuscular transmission has been inhibited are reopened several months later due to the formation of a nerve branch from the axonal side, and the muscular relaxation disappears [6]. The effect of BTA treatment on muscle spasticity is generally assessed using the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). However, the evaluation by MAS is less objective and has differences among the examiners, and MAS is not highly reliable [7-9]. Therefore, there have been few objective outcome measures regarding the effect of BTA treatment, and the optimal dose, duration of the effect, and the interval of re-administration of BTA have not been clarified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中患者注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素前后肌张力图定量评价肌肉僵硬度
脑卒中后肌肉痉挛引起疼痛和日常生活活动能力下降,是患者生活质量和社会参与下降的原因之一。肉毒杆菌毒素是由肉毒梭菌产生的一种神经毒素,其中a型是最稳定、毒性最强的一种。1977年,Scott[2]首次将A型肉毒毒素(BTA)用于斜视的临床治疗,同时也用于眼睑痉挛、面肌痉挛、痉挛性斜颈的治疗。近年来,BTA被广泛应用于脑卒中后肌肉痉挛的治疗,有许多报道称BTA治疗是一种安全有效的治疗方法[3-5]。BTA切割参与神经肌肉连接处神经末梢乙酰胆碱释放的SNAP25蛋白。从而抑制乙酰胆碱的释放,抑制神经肌肉传递,获得肌肉松弛。神经肌肉传导被抑制的神经元在几个月后由于从轴突侧形成的神经分支而重新打开,肌肉松弛消失。BTA治疗肌肉痉挛的效果一般采用改良Ashworth量表(MAS)评估。然而,MAS的评价不够客观,考官之间存在差异,可靠性不高[7-9]。因此,关于BTA治疗效果的客观结局指标很少,BTA的最佳剂量、疗效持续时间和再次服用BTA的间隔时间也没有明确的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Specific intracellular Ca2+ signal in hepatocytes after 70% partial hepatectomy in rats Skeleton-driven dynamics modeling for computer-aided muscular rehabilitation Probable causes of blood clotting driven by SARS-CoV-2 Spinal segmental sensitization as a common origin of chronic non-specific regional musculoskeletal pain: review of its pathophysiology and diagnosis Unmet needs for community-based physiotherapy services for adults in Canada and the United States: a scoping review protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1