Vera Teresa Valdemarin, Marcus Aldenisson DE Oliveira
{"title":"“THE FAILURE OF NEW SCHOOL REFORM”: ATALIBA DE OLIVEIRA INTERPRETING THE PAULISTA SCHOOL RENOVATION (THE 1930s AND 1940s)","authors":"Vera Teresa Valdemarin, Marcus Aldenisson DE Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/0102-469838999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Under the perspective guided by Darnton (1986), this article aims to capture the interpretations made by Ataliba Antonio de Oliveira about the new school movement. It is about a teacher from São Paulo who followed and resisted closely and from within the onslaughts and attempts at pedagogical renewal in progress in the São Paulo school system. By writing more than two hundred chronicles, interpreting among other themes the initiatives of the Escolanovistas in São Paulo, Ataliba de Oliveira pointed out the errors that characterized “the failure of new school reform”. After inventorying and analyzing these chronicles, this article intends to answer the question: How did Ataliba de Oliveira interpret the new school movement and the tentatives of inserting this pedagogical doctrine in the Paulista school apparatus between 1930 and 1940? The comparative logical structures the most of the chronicles, and through them, are revealed his most scathing criticism to the reform, the reformers, and the educational consequences of those actions. He also revealed the patterns that he intended to preserve. Taken together, the chronicles of Ataliba de Oliveira made up the interpretation that “the failure of new school reform” occurred because its apologists did not consider the data and situations of the Paulista school reality, nor the conditions faced by teachers and students in the educational task.","PeriodicalId":34106,"journal":{"name":"Educacao em Revista","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao em Revista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-469838999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Under the perspective guided by Darnton (1986), this article aims to capture the interpretations made by Ataliba Antonio de Oliveira about the new school movement. It is about a teacher from São Paulo who followed and resisted closely and from within the onslaughts and attempts at pedagogical renewal in progress in the São Paulo school system. By writing more than two hundred chronicles, interpreting among other themes the initiatives of the Escolanovistas in São Paulo, Ataliba de Oliveira pointed out the errors that characterized “the failure of new school reform”. After inventorying and analyzing these chronicles, this article intends to answer the question: How did Ataliba de Oliveira interpret the new school movement and the tentatives of inserting this pedagogical doctrine in the Paulista school apparatus between 1930 and 1940? The comparative logical structures the most of the chronicles, and through them, are revealed his most scathing criticism to the reform, the reformers, and the educational consequences of those actions. He also revealed the patterns that he intended to preserve. Taken together, the chronicles of Ataliba de Oliveira made up the interpretation that “the failure of new school reform” occurred because its apologists did not consider the data and situations of the Paulista school reality, nor the conditions faced by teachers and students in the educational task.
摘要:本文在达恩顿(1986)的视角下,试图捕捉阿塔利巴·安东尼奥·德·奥利维拉对新学派运动的解读。它是关于一位来自圣保罗的老师,他密切关注并抵制圣保罗学校系统中正在进行的教学更新的冲击和尝试。Ataliba de Oliveira撰写了200多部编年史,在其他主题中解释了圣保罗escolanovista的倡议,指出了“新学校改革失败”的错误。在对这些编年史进行整理和分析之后,本文打算回答这样一个问题:在1930年至1940年间,阿塔利巴·德·奥利维拉是如何解释新学校运动和将这种教学教义插入保利斯塔学校机构的试探性的?编年史大部分的比较逻辑结构,通过这些结构,揭示了他对改革、改革者以及这些行为的教育后果的最严厉的批评。他还揭示了他打算保留的模式。综上所述,Ataliba de Oliveira编年史构成了“新学校改革的失败”的解释,因为它的辩护者没有考虑到保利斯塔学校现实的数据和情况,也没有考虑到教师和学生在教育任务中面临的条件。