The Almighty Akçe: The Economics of Scholarship and Science in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-24 DOI:10.18589/oa.1041669
N. Shafir
{"title":"The Almighty Akçe: The Economics of Scholarship and Science in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire","authors":"N. Shafir","doi":"10.18589/oa.1041669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it possible for science to exist without theory? This basic question animates Harun Küçük’s new book, Science without Leisure. For Küçük, the answer is no, and the Ottoman Empire provides an instructive example of what happens when scientific practice exists in a vacuum of theory. Putting a new twist on some of the familiar narratives regarding science in the Ottoman Empire during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, Küçük argues that many Ottoman subjects practiced the natural sciences but the missing ingredient was theory. This lack of theory in turn emerged because the scholars in the madrasa were being paid too little. They lacked the “leisure” afforded by affluence to devote themselves to theory and thus became ignorant, law-obsessed, and, ultimately, insignificant. In this moment of intellectual and economic decline, the earlier tradition of Islamic science was pushed aside by new “practical naturalists,” who came to dominate the social field of science. Yet, the practical naturalism of the Ottomans never came to resemble modern, or rather early modern, science in Europe because it lacked a connection to theory.","PeriodicalId":43709,"journal":{"name":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osmanli Arastirmalari-The Journal of Ottoman Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18589/oa.1041669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Is it possible for science to exist without theory? This basic question animates Harun Küçük’s new book, Science without Leisure. For Küçük, the answer is no, and the Ottoman Empire provides an instructive example of what happens when scientific practice exists in a vacuum of theory. Putting a new twist on some of the familiar narratives regarding science in the Ottoman Empire during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, Küçük argues that many Ottoman subjects practiced the natural sciences but the missing ingredient was theory. This lack of theory in turn emerged because the scholars in the madrasa were being paid too little. They lacked the “leisure” afforded by affluence to devote themselves to theory and thus became ignorant, law-obsessed, and, ultimately, insignificant. In this moment of intellectual and economic decline, the earlier tradition of Islamic science was pushed aside by new “practical naturalists,” who came to dominate the social field of science. Yet, the practical naturalism of the Ottomans never came to resemble modern, or rather early modern, science in Europe because it lacked a connection to theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全能的akrere:近代早期奥斯曼帝国的学术与科学经济学
没有理论,科学有可能存在吗?这个基本问题激发了Harun k 的新书《没有闲暇的科学》(Science without Leisure)。对于k k来说,答案是否定的,奥斯曼帝国提供了一个有益的例子,说明科学实践存在于理论真空中会发生什么。在17世纪和18世纪奥斯曼帝国关于科学的一些熟悉的叙述中,k k提出了一个新的转折,认为许多奥斯曼臣民实践自然科学,但缺少的成分是理论。这种缺乏理论的现象反过来又出现了,因为伊斯兰学校的学者们得到的报酬太少了。他们缺乏富裕所提供的“闲暇时间”来投身于理论,因此变得无知、痴迷于法律,最终变得无足轻重。在这个智力和经济衰退的时刻,早期的伊斯兰科学传统被新的“实用自然主义者”推到一边,他们开始主宰科学的社会领域。然而,奥斯曼人的实用自然主义从来没有像现代,或者更确切地说,近代早期的欧洲科学一样,因为它缺乏与理论的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ottoman Studies has been published continuously since 1980 and has carried the pluralist heritage of the Ottomans to contemporary academe by bringing together Ottomanists from different countries as well as from different disciplines and schools of thought. As the founder of the journal, the late Nejat Göyünç (1925-2001), stated in the preface he wrote for the first volume of the journal, the aim of the journal “is to become a means for the increasingly growing number of students of Ottoman Studies to get together in this journal, to encourage young members of the scholarly profession by publishing their interesting research …, to help them to become known, and to facilitate the presentation of their research to the scholarly world.”
期刊最新文献
Gelibolu Yarımadası’nda İlk Osmanlıların Fetih Güzergâhı ve Gelibolu’nun Fethi (1354) Walter Feldman, Osmanlı’da Mevleviliğin Kültürel Tarihi: Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Şiir, Müzik ve Tasavvuf, Osmanlı-Kutsal İttifak Savaşlarında Bir Savaş Finansman Kaynağı Olarak Nefîr-i Âmm Bedeli (1688-1689) Ebubekir Ceylan, Modern Irak’ın Osmanlı Kökenleri, Edirne Bâdi Efendi Nüshasının ‘İlk Anonim Kronik’ Olduğu İddiası ile Neşri Üzerine Bazı Mülahazalar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1