Prejudice associated with weight images in health communication in the social networks

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Revista De Nutricao-brazilian Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI:10.1590/1678-9865202336e210220
Pabyle Alves Flauzino, Y. A. Freire, Ingridy Ruana Marques Monteiro, Sara Costa Martins Rodrigues Soares, A. Carioca
{"title":"Prejudice associated with weight images in health communication in the social networks","authors":"Pabyle Alves Flauzino, Y. A. Freire, Ingridy Ruana Marques Monteiro, Sara Costa Martins Rodrigues Soares, A. Carioca","doi":"10.1590/1678-9865202336e210220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the depiction of a fat body for health communication on the Instagram social network by the national societies governing obesity management present elements that enhance weight-related prejudice, with the slim body as a reference. Methods We investigated the last publication quintile, totaling 2,155 publications. A total of 72 images were included and 99 bodies were decoded. The bodies were classified according to positive and negative characteristics into four categories (body presentation, clothing, food and moving behavior) in which the negative characteristics have the potential to enhance the prejudice. The chi-square test was applied to test the difference in the proportion of bias elements associated with body weight between the fat body and the thin body. Results The fat body was more represented (p≤0.05 for all) headless (32.3% vs 9.2%), with bare abdomen (17.6% vs 0%), with a focus on the abdomen (11% vs 0% ), with tight clothes (32.3% vs 0%), sad expression (23.5% vs 6.1%), involved with food of low nutritional value (14.7% vs 0%) and in sedentary behavior ( 11% vs 0%) compared to the thin body. Conclusion National societies that govern management of obesity presented the fat body with more negative elements that enhance the prejudice associated with excess weight, which is an important public health problem.","PeriodicalId":21305,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Nutricao-brazilian Journal of Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Nutricao-brazilian Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202336e210220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the depiction of a fat body for health communication on the Instagram social network by the national societies governing obesity management present elements that enhance weight-related prejudice, with the slim body as a reference. Methods We investigated the last publication quintile, totaling 2,155 publications. A total of 72 images were included and 99 bodies were decoded. The bodies were classified according to positive and negative characteristics into four categories (body presentation, clothing, food and moving behavior) in which the negative characteristics have the potential to enhance the prejudice. The chi-square test was applied to test the difference in the proportion of bias elements associated with body weight between the fat body and the thin body. Results The fat body was more represented (p≤0.05 for all) headless (32.3% vs 9.2%), with bare abdomen (17.6% vs 0%), with a focus on the abdomen (11% vs 0% ), with tight clothes (32.3% vs 0%), sad expression (23.5% vs 6.1%), involved with food of low nutritional value (14.7% vs 0%) and in sedentary behavior ( 11% vs 0%) compared to the thin body. Conclusion National societies that govern management of obesity presented the fat body with more negative elements that enhance the prejudice associated with excess weight, which is an important public health problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会网络健康传播中与体重形象相关的偏见
摘要目的本研究的目的是评估国家肥胖管理协会在Instagram社交网络上对肥胖身体的健康传播的描述是否存在增强体重相关偏见的因素,并以苗条的身体为参考。方法对最后五分位数的出版物进行调查,共2155篇。总共包括72幅图像,并对99具尸体进行了解码。根据正面和负面的身体特征将被试的身体分为四类(身体呈现、衣着、食物和移动行为),其中负面的身体特征有可能增强偏见。采用卡方检验检验胖瘦体与体重相关偏倚因子比例的差异。结果与瘦体相比,肥胖体更多地代表无头(32.3%比9.2%)、裸露腹部(17.6%比0%)、关注腹部(11%比0%)、穿紧身衣服(32.3%比0%)、表情悲伤(23.5%比6.1%)、参与低营养价值食物(14.7%比0%)和久坐行为(11%比0%)。结论国家肥胖管理协会对肥胖体的负面评价较多,增加了与超重相关的偏见,这是一个重要的公共卫生问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Nutrição is former Revista de Nutrição da Puccamp, founded in 1988. It is a bimonthly publication every four months and it is of responsibility of the Centro de Ciências da Vida, da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas . It publishes articles that contribute to the study of Nutrition in its many sub-areas and interfaces; and is open to contributions of the national and international scientific communities.
期刊最新文献
Food practices and nutritional status of university students who use the University Restaurant Characterization of the dietary and sociodemographic profile of a group of Colombian vegetarian women in childbearing age during the period 2021-2022 Association between glycemic control in different emotional conditions and adherence to carbohydrate counting in people with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children Changes in the frequency of food consumption by adults/elderly according to food insecurity: evidence from a longitudinal study in the northeastern semi-arid region, Brazil, 2011-2014
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1