ДИДАКТИКА: РАЗВИТИЕ ИЛИ ЗАСТОЙ?

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science Pub Date : 2016-01-26 DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-133-144
Смирнов Игорь Павлович
{"title":"ДИДАКТИКА: РАЗВИТИЕ ИЛИ ЗАСТОЙ?","authors":"Смирнов Игорь Павлович","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-133-144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ARTICLE RETRACTED The aim of the paper – the detailed analysis of the monograph «Contents and Structure of Regularities of Process of Training (Theory and Experiment)» which is written by the corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Education (RAE), Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Professor I. I. Logvinov. The book was included into a series «Basic researches of institute of the theory and history of pedagogics of the Russian Academy of Education. Proceedings 2008–2012». The review of the monograph of I. I. Logvinov has become a reason for reflections of the author of the present publication about actual, most burning issues of a modern Russian educational system: on the status of pedagogics in modern domestic science; evolutions of didactic knowledge and its typology; quality of dissertation researches and emasculation in scientific pedagogical concepts of the fundamental bases; ideologization of didactics and a role of the state in this process. Sorting basic thesis of I. I. Logvinov’s work, in something agreeing, and in something arguing with the scientist, the author of article claims that it is a serious and necessary work where the extremely important questions concerning the most painful points of the Russian pedagogical science and a condition of our education in general are brought up.","PeriodicalId":44143,"journal":{"name":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"133-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-133-144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ARTICLE RETRACTED The aim of the paper – the detailed analysis of the monograph «Contents and Structure of Regularities of Process of Training (Theory and Experiment)» which is written by the corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Education (RAE), Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Professor I. I. Logvinov. The book was included into a series «Basic researches of institute of the theory and history of pedagogics of the Russian Academy of Education. Proceedings 2008–2012». The review of the monograph of I. I. Logvinov has become a reason for reflections of the author of the present publication about actual, most burning issues of a modern Russian educational system: on the status of pedagogics in modern domestic science; evolutions of didactic knowledge and its typology; quality of dissertation researches and emasculation in scientific pedagogical concepts of the fundamental bases; ideologization of didactics and a role of the state in this process. Sorting basic thesis of I. I. Logvinov’s work, in something agreeing, and in something arguing with the scientist, the author of article claims that it is a serious and necessary work where the extremely important questions concerning the most painful points of the Russian pedagogical science and a condition of our education in general are brought up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是发展还是停滞?
本文的目的是对俄罗斯教育科学院(RAE)通讯委员、教育学博士、I. I. Logvinov教授撰写的专著《训练过程规律的内容和结构(理论与实验)》进行详细分析。这本书被列入系列«俄罗斯教育学院教育学理论和历史研究所基础研究»。学报》2008 - 2012年。”对洛格维诺夫专著的回顾,使本文作者有理由反思现代俄罗斯教育体系中最现实、最亟待解决的问题:教育学在现代国内科学中的地位;教学知识的演变及其类型学研究论文研究质量和阉割科学教学观念的基础;教学的意识形态化和国家在这一过程中的作用。文章的作者整理了I. I. Logvinov的工作的基本论点,在一些同意的地方,在一些与科学家争论的地方,声称这是一部严肃的和必要的工作,其中提出了关于俄罗斯教育科学最痛苦的问题和我们一般教育状况的极其重要的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ensuring the unity of the federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development: Opportunities and risks Influence of academic-professional hardiness on the subjective well-being of students in socionomic professions Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Bystander strategies Contemporary contexts of higher medical education development: Patient-centred care in medical students’ understanding Publication activity of Russian university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1