The primitive and superman in L.S. Vygotsky's cultural psychology

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.17223/17267080/82/1
A. Maidansky
{"title":"The primitive and superman in L.S. Vygotsky's cultural psychology","authors":"A. Maidansky","doi":"10.17223/17267080/82/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Western Vygotskian studies of recent years have criticized the Vygotsky's theory of the historical development of a human mind from the “primitive” through the “cultural man” to the “superman.” Some researchers discover colonialistic arrogance and even racism in the “primitive” concept, and they also attribute the “superman” concept to the influence of Nietzsche and Marxist revolutionary utopias (such as Kautsky, Trotsky). At the same time, they don't take into account Vygotsky's criticism of the modern “cultural man”. The article reveals the actual content of these concepts in the theory of Vygotsky, through a polemic with Megan Bang (Professor of Educational Psychology at Washington University, Senior Vice President of the Spencer Foundation). The historical framework for the existence of a primitive man is defined as following: from the start of labouring life to the invention of “signification.” At that moment, when people started to regulate communicative processes by means of signs, primitive mind became cultured. Signification forms the primary basis of higher psychological functions, all without exception. For Vygotsky, the “primitive” is not an ideological brand, but the starting point of human cultural development. Each of us entered the life as a primitive. Due to the division of labour into physical and mental and the progressive specialization of labour activities, “the individual has been turned into a fraction” (Vygotsky). The growth of cultural power of humanity comes at the expense of an individual's degradation. The modern cultural type is subject to a profound remelting, including its psychological structures. But it would be remelting not into a new, modernized kind of the primitive, but into a higher kind of cultured man - into a “superhuman.” The era of supermen will come as a result of the “polytechnical changes of labour”, i.e. transformation of labour into an applied science. According to Vygotsky, the psychology of the future will become a “theory and practice of superman.” His book Pedagogical Psychology elaborates the foundations of polytechnic education “for tomorrow,” which aims to form a free, universally developed personality that creates the conditions of its own life and regulates its psychological functions. The superhuman is the free human, homo liber. According to Vygotsky, human freedom consists in the self-active, cultural transformation of our own mode of life. By transforming the external world, labour thereby transforms its subject - the structure of human body, our way of life and social relationships.","PeriodicalId":42898,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal-Siberian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/82/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Western Vygotskian studies of recent years have criticized the Vygotsky's theory of the historical development of a human mind from the “primitive” through the “cultural man” to the “superman.” Some researchers discover colonialistic arrogance and even racism in the “primitive” concept, and they also attribute the “superman” concept to the influence of Nietzsche and Marxist revolutionary utopias (such as Kautsky, Trotsky). At the same time, they don't take into account Vygotsky's criticism of the modern “cultural man”. The article reveals the actual content of these concepts in the theory of Vygotsky, through a polemic with Megan Bang (Professor of Educational Psychology at Washington University, Senior Vice President of the Spencer Foundation). The historical framework for the existence of a primitive man is defined as following: from the start of labouring life to the invention of “signification.” At that moment, when people started to regulate communicative processes by means of signs, primitive mind became cultured. Signification forms the primary basis of higher psychological functions, all without exception. For Vygotsky, the “primitive” is not an ideological brand, but the starting point of human cultural development. Each of us entered the life as a primitive. Due to the division of labour into physical and mental and the progressive specialization of labour activities, “the individual has been turned into a fraction” (Vygotsky). The growth of cultural power of humanity comes at the expense of an individual's degradation. The modern cultural type is subject to a profound remelting, including its psychological structures. But it would be remelting not into a new, modernized kind of the primitive, but into a higher kind of cultured man - into a “superhuman.” The era of supermen will come as a result of the “polytechnical changes of labour”, i.e. transformation of labour into an applied science. According to Vygotsky, the psychology of the future will become a “theory and practice of superman.” His book Pedagogical Psychology elaborates the foundations of polytechnic education “for tomorrow,” which aims to form a free, universally developed personality that creates the conditions of its own life and regulates its psychological functions. The superhuman is the free human, homo liber. According to Vygotsky, human freedom consists in the self-active, cultural transformation of our own mode of life. By transforming the external world, labour thereby transforms its subject - the structure of human body, our way of life and social relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维果茨基文化心理学中的原始与超人
近年来西方的维果茨基研究对维果茨基关于人类心智从“原始人”到“文化人”再到“超人”的历史发展理论进行了批判。一些研究者在“原始”概念中发现了殖民主义的傲慢甚至种族主义,并将“超人”概念归因于尼采和马克思主义革命乌托邦(如考茨基、托洛茨基)的影响。同时也没有考虑到维果茨基对现代“文化人”的批判。本文通过与Megan Bang(华盛顿大学教育心理学教授,斯宾塞基金会高级副总裁)的辩论,揭示了维果茨基理论中这些概念的实际内容。原始人存在的历史框架定义如下:从开始劳动生活到发明“意义”。在这个时候,人们开始通过符号来调节交流过程,原始的思维变得有文化了。意义构成了高级心理功能的主要基础,无一例外。在维果茨基看来,“原始”不是一个思想烙印,而是人类文化发展的起点。我们每个人都是以原始人的身份进入生命的。由于体力劳动和脑力劳动的分工以及劳动活动的逐步专业化,“个体已经变成了一个碎片”(维果茨基)。人类文化力量的增长是以牺牲个人的堕落为代价的。现代文化类型正在经历一场深刻的重新融化,包括其心理结构。但它不会重新融化成一种新的、现代化的原始人,而是融化成一种更高级的有文化的人——一种“超人”。超人时代的到来是“劳动的综合技术变革”的结果,即劳动向应用科学的转变。维果茨基认为,未来的心理学将成为“理论与实践的超人”。他的著作《教育心理学》阐述了“面向明天”的理工教育的基础,其目的是形成一个自由的、普遍发展的人格,创造自己的生活条件,调节自己的心理功能。超人是自由的人,自由的人。维果茨基认为,人的自由在于对自己的生活方式进行自我主动的文化改造。劳动通过改造外部世界,从而改造了它的主体——人体结构、我们的生活方式和社会关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Mental Structures on the Efficiency of Self-Regulation of Mental States in Students' Learning Activities Health as a Result of Everyday Choice: Development and Validation of the Motivation of Actions For and Against Health Scale Psychophysiological Correlates of Coping Behavior in Adolescents Who Have Undergone COVID-19 The study of subjective life quality and subjective well-being in late ontogenesis The Modern Cultural Context of Ideas about the Future in Adolescence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1