Effect Of Deck Cracking On Prestress

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PCI Journal Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.15554/pcij64.3-04
Soumya Vadlamani, Richard A. Miller, G. Rassati
{"title":"Effect Of Deck Cracking On Prestress","authors":"Soumya Vadlamani, Richard A. Miller, G. Rassati","doi":"10.15554/pcij64.3-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"■ Analysis of the results shows that deck cracking will occur, but approximately 50% of the prestress gain due to differential shrinkage will be retained after the deck cracks. As soon as a prestressing force is applied to a concrete member, loss of that prestressing force begins to occur. The method used for calculating prestress losses in the first edition of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, was modeled on the 17th edition of the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges and considered losses due to elastic shortening, relaxation of prestressing strands, and creep and shrinkage in the concrete. While the effect of elastic shortening was calculated from mechanics, a simple formula was used to estimate the relaxation, creep, and shrinkage losses. For composite structures, the effects of adding a deck were not considered. These effects include the creep and shrinkage of the girder between the time the girder is fabricated and the time the deck is placed, the dead load of the deck when it is placed, and creep and shrinkage effects in the deck itself.","PeriodicalId":54637,"journal":{"name":"PCI Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij64.3-04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

■ Analysis of the results shows that deck cracking will occur, but approximately 50% of the prestress gain due to differential shrinkage will be retained after the deck cracks. As soon as a prestressing force is applied to a concrete member, loss of that prestressing force begins to occur. The method used for calculating prestress losses in the first edition of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, was modeled on the 17th edition of the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges and considered losses due to elastic shortening, relaxation of prestressing strands, and creep and shrinkage in the concrete. While the effect of elastic shortening was calculated from mechanics, a simple formula was used to estimate the relaxation, creep, and shrinkage losses. For composite structures, the effects of adding a deck were not considered. These effects include the creep and shrinkage of the girder between the time the girder is fabricated and the time the deck is placed, the dead load of the deck when it is placed, and creep and shrinkage effects in the deck itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桥面开裂对预应力的影响
■对结果的分析表明,甲板会发生开裂,但由于差异收缩而获得的预应力增益约有50%将在甲板开裂后保留。一旦预应力施加到混凝土构件上,预应力的损失就开始发生。美国国家公路和交通官员协会AASHTO LRFD桥梁设计规范第一版中用于计算预应力损失的方法以AASHTO公路桥梁标准规范第17版为模型,并考虑了弹性缩短、预应力链松弛、混凝土徐变和收缩造成的损失。虽然弹性缩短的影响是从力学上计算的,但使用一个简单的公式来估计松弛、蠕变和收缩损失。对于组合结构,没有考虑加甲板的影响。这些影响包括梁的徐变和收缩之间的时间梁的制作和时间的甲板放置,甲板的自重当它放置,和徐变和收缩效应在甲板本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PCI Journal
PCI Journal 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
自引率
9.10%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultra-high-performance concrete research at PCI Experimental study on the use of compound alkaline materials to solidify lake sediments Axial load behavior of reinforced concrete columns with high-strength steel coiled strips as confinement Supply chain management for modular construction using building information modeling Investigating UHPC in deck bulb-tee girder connections, part 2: Full-scale experimental testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1