Diachronic and achronic characteristics of a dull sibilant ս (s) of Old Armenian language

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17223/18137083/80/15
Vardan Z. Petrosyan
{"title":"Diachronic and achronic characteristics of a dull sibilant ս (s) of Old Armenian language","authors":"Vardan Z. Petrosyan","doi":"10.17223/18137083/80/15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vast majority of the Armenian words of Indo-European origin with ս (s) have the nasalized *ḱ as their prototype. By combining back-lingual prototypes (comp. *ḱ, *k, *g՛, *gh) from one side and all the sibilant prototypes (comp. *s, *(s)s, *z, *z / s, *(p)s, *s(p), *s(t), *s(kh)) from the other side, a 2 : 1 quantitative proportion can be established in favor of the posterior ones. The number of the words restored with nasalized voiceless back-lingual *ḱ is about 1.7 times higher than those restored with fricative voiceless sibilant *s. However, quantitative prevalence is not yet sufficient to consider Indo-European *ḱ the original prototype of the Armenian ս (s), thus the initial phoneme from which the Old Armenian sibilant ս (s) could have derived after the separation of Armenian from the common Indo-European language. There are two reasons preventing such a conclusion: 1) the prototype with *s is restored for numerous Armenian words in comparative Armenian studies; 2) the first and second nasalization of the Indo-European back-lingual, which also resulted in sibilant phonemes in Indo-European languages, all dating back to a later period. The twofold quantitative prevalence of the cases of transition of Indo-European *ḱ to Armenian ս (s) compared to the transition of *s > ս (s), is likely to have originated similarly to the transition from the nasalized back-lingual occlusives to fricatives and occlusive-fricatives. It was a common phenomenon not only in Armenian but also in almost all of the eastern (satəm) group languages.","PeriodicalId":53939,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/80/15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vast majority of the Armenian words of Indo-European origin with ս (s) have the nasalized *ḱ as their prototype. By combining back-lingual prototypes (comp. *ḱ, *k, *g՛, *gh) from one side and all the sibilant prototypes (comp. *s, *(s)s, *z, *z / s, *(p)s, *s(p), *s(t), *s(kh)) from the other side, a 2 : 1 quantitative proportion can be established in favor of the posterior ones. The number of the words restored with nasalized voiceless back-lingual *ḱ is about 1.7 times higher than those restored with fricative voiceless sibilant *s. However, quantitative prevalence is not yet sufficient to consider Indo-European *ḱ the original prototype of the Armenian ս (s), thus the initial phoneme from which the Old Armenian sibilant ս (s) could have derived after the separation of Armenian from the common Indo-European language. There are two reasons preventing such a conclusion: 1) the prototype with *s is restored for numerous Armenian words in comparative Armenian studies; 2) the first and second nasalization of the Indo-European back-lingual, which also resulted in sibilant phonemes in Indo-European languages, all dating back to a later period. The twofold quantitative prevalence of the cases of transition of Indo-European *ḱ to Armenian ս (s) compared to the transition of *s > ս (s), is likely to have originated similarly to the transition from the nasalized back-lingual occlusives to fricatives and occlusive-fricatives. It was a common phenomenon not only in Armenian but also in almost all of the eastern (satəm) group languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古亚美尼亚语中哑音的历时性和历时性特征
绝大多数源自印欧语系的亚美尼亚语单词都以鼻音化的* *为原型。将一侧的后语原型(comp. * *, *k, *g , *gh)和另一侧的所有音节原型(comp. *s, *(s)s, *z, *z / s, *(p)s, *s(p), *s(t), *s(kh))结合起来,可以建立2:1的定量比例,有利于后语原型。用带鼻音的后语无音*s恢复的单词数量大约是用摩擦音的无音*s恢复的单词数量的1.7倍。然而,数量上的流行程度还不足以认为印欧语* *是亚美尼亚语的原始原型,因此在亚美尼亚语与共同的印欧语分离后,古亚美尼亚语的音节可能是从这个音素中衍生出来的。有两个原因阻碍了这样的结论:1)在比较亚美尼亚语研究中,许多亚美尼亚语单词恢复了带有*s的原型;2)印欧语系的第一次和第二次鼻音化,这也导致了印欧语系的音节音素,所有这些都可以追溯到较晚的时期。双重定量流行的印欧语系*ḱ过渡到亚美尼亚ս(s)相比的过渡* s >ս(s),很可能是同样的转变使鼻音化back-lingual occlusives摩擦音和occlusive-fricatives。这是一个普遍的现象,不仅在亚美尼亚,而且在几乎所有的东部(sat æ m)群体语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“New positioning” of Mayakovsky by Yue Fenglin in China The position of the tongue in the oral cavity as an additional articulation of vowels Spring songs of Belarusians of Siberia and the Far East: structural-rhythmic typology “Sing in Different Rhythms”: the form, content, and pragmatics of the poetic stylizations of “Iskra” From the history of words V. Turkisms in Russian dialects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1