Philosophy of synthesis and aesthetics of painting of Ivan Goncharov in his book of travelogues Frigate “Pallada”

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17223/18137083/81/7
Kristina K. Pavlovich
{"title":"Philosophy of synthesis and aesthetics of painting of Ivan Goncharov in his book of travelogues Frigate “Pallada”","authors":"Kristina K. Pavlovich","doi":"10.17223/18137083/81/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is dedicated to identifying the origins of the artistic synthesis and aesthetics of the art of Ivan Goncharov. Of particular importance in the formation of Goncharov as a writer was Nikolai Nadezhdin. From Nadezhdin, Goncharov inherited an important philosophical category of synthesis. Underlying Nadezhdin’s aesthetic conceptions was the theory of synthesis of the classical and the romantic as the basis of contemporary art. His artistic theory was organically perceived by Goncharov. He understood the development of a literary process as a combination of two extremes: classical and romantic. Goncharov’s understanding of “synthesis” is distinguidhes by the reference to artistry and movement towards the poetization of reality. Depiction is associated with the aesthetics of the writer and the epic understanding of reality. The idea of synthesis was embodied in the character of Goncharov’s formulation of the problem of painting and of the pictorial principle. The aesthetic form of the embodiment of synthesis in the Frigate “Pallada” is represented by numerous “paintings,” “views,” “drawings,” etc., expressing the idea of the artistry of Ivan Goncharov. In Goncharov’s work, depiction appears as a stable system. It is manifested in the image plasticity, dynamic interaction of forms, volumes, color elements, the play of light and shadow, flexibility of lines, various spatial organization, and detailing of the depicted objects, dynamic and static. Goncharov’s depiction is considered a philosophical way of depicting man and reality.","PeriodicalId":53939,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/81/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to identifying the origins of the artistic synthesis and aesthetics of the art of Ivan Goncharov. Of particular importance in the formation of Goncharov as a writer was Nikolai Nadezhdin. From Nadezhdin, Goncharov inherited an important philosophical category of synthesis. Underlying Nadezhdin’s aesthetic conceptions was the theory of synthesis of the classical and the romantic as the basis of contemporary art. His artistic theory was organically perceived by Goncharov. He understood the development of a literary process as a combination of two extremes: classical and romantic. Goncharov’s understanding of “synthesis” is distinguidhes by the reference to artistry and movement towards the poetization of reality. Depiction is associated with the aesthetics of the writer and the epic understanding of reality. The idea of synthesis was embodied in the character of Goncharov’s formulation of the problem of painting and of the pictorial principle. The aesthetic form of the embodiment of synthesis in the Frigate “Pallada” is represented by numerous “paintings,” “views,” “drawings,” etc., expressing the idea of the artistry of Ivan Goncharov. In Goncharov’s work, depiction appears as a stable system. It is manifested in the image plasticity, dynamic interaction of forms, volumes, color elements, the play of light and shadow, flexibility of lines, various spatial organization, and detailing of the depicted objects, dynamic and static. Goncharov’s depiction is considered a philosophical way of depicting man and reality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冈恰罗夫游记《帕拉达号》中绘画的综合哲学与美学
本文旨在探讨冈查罗夫艺术综合与美学的起源。在贡恰罗夫成为作家的过程中,尼古拉·纳杰日金起了特别重要的作用。贡恰罗夫从纳杰日金那里继承了一个重要的哲学范畴——综合。纳杰日金的美学观念是古典与浪漫的综合理论,是当代艺术的基础。贡恰罗夫有机地领会了他的艺术理论。他认为文学过程的发展是两个极端的结合:古典主义和浪漫主义。贡恰罗夫对“综合”的理解主要体现在对艺术性的提及和对现实诗化的运动。描写与作家的审美和对现实的史诗理解有关。综合的思想体现在冈查洛夫对绘画问题的表述和绘画原则的特点中。综合体现在护卫舰“帕拉达”号上的美学形式是由无数的“绘画”、“景色”、“素描”等来表现的,表达了伊万·贡恰罗夫的艺术思想。在Goncharov的作品中,描绘表现为一个稳定的系统。表现在形象的可塑性,形态、体量、色彩元素的动态互动,光影的发挥,线条的灵活性,空间组织的多样性,被描绘对象的细节化,动态与静态。冈查罗夫的描绘被认为是一种描绘人与现实的哲学方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“New positioning” of Mayakovsky by Yue Fenglin in China The position of the tongue in the oral cavity as an additional articulation of vowels Spring songs of Belarusians of Siberia and the Far East: structural-rhythmic typology “Sing in Different Rhythms”: the form, content, and pragmatics of the poetic stylizations of “Iskra” From the history of words V. Turkisms in Russian dialects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1