Blood cell count is not a significant predictor of survival in bladder cancer after radical cystectomy

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Universa Medicina Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.18051/univmed.2021.v40.151-159
A. Andy, F. F. Prapiska, G. P. Siregar, S. M. Warli, Bungaran Sihombing
{"title":"Blood cell count is not a significant predictor of survival in bladder cancer after radical cystectomy","authors":"A. Andy, F. F. Prapiska, G. P. Siregar, S. M. Warli, Bungaran Sihombing","doi":"10.18051/univmed.2021.v40.151-159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundRadical cystectomy (RC) is the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. A predictive factor is needed for the aggressive approach as it could lead to overtreatment. Elevated blood cell count (BCC) markers are reported to have a significant association with poor outcomes in several types of malignancy. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are well-known inexpensive and effective representative markers of inflammatory conditions. This study aimed to determine the BCC as a predictive factor of overall survival (OS) in patients with bladder carcinoma (BC) after RC. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 26 patients who had undergone RC. The demographic characteristics and BCC markers such as hemoglobin (Hb). NLR, PLR and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) were collected. The patients were categorized based on the BCC marker value (³ median and < median). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was done to determine overall survival (OS) on BCC markers. The association between patient demographics and one-year survival was also determined using Mantel-Cox (Log-rank) method. ResultsAmong the 26 patients, the mean age was 55.6 ± 12.9 years. On univariate analysis, none of the demographic characteristics was found to be a significant predictor of one-year and overall survival (p>0.05). Hemoglobin, NLR, PLR and LMR were not significant predictors of one-year survival and OS (p>0.05). ConclusionsThe BCC was not a significant predictive factor of survival in patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy.","PeriodicalId":42578,"journal":{"name":"Universa Medicina","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universa Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2021.v40.151-159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundRadical cystectomy (RC) is the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. A predictive factor is needed for the aggressive approach as it could lead to overtreatment. Elevated blood cell count (BCC) markers are reported to have a significant association with poor outcomes in several types of malignancy. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are well-known inexpensive and effective representative markers of inflammatory conditions. This study aimed to determine the BCC as a predictive factor of overall survival (OS) in patients with bladder carcinoma (BC) after RC. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 26 patients who had undergone RC. The demographic characteristics and BCC markers such as hemoglobin (Hb). NLR, PLR and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) were collected. The patients were categorized based on the BCC marker value (³ median and < median). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was done to determine overall survival (OS) on BCC markers. The association between patient demographics and one-year survival was also determined using Mantel-Cox (Log-rank) method. ResultsAmong the 26 patients, the mean age was 55.6 ± 12.9 years. On univariate analysis, none of the demographic characteristics was found to be a significant predictor of one-year and overall survival (p>0.05). Hemoglobin, NLR, PLR and LMR were not significant predictors of one-year survival and OS (p>0.05). ConclusionsThe BCC was not a significant predictive factor of survival in patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血细胞计数不是膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后生存率的重要预测因子
背景:根治性膀胱切除术(RC)是治疗肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的金标准。积极的方法需要一个预测因素,因为它可能导致过度治疗。据报道,在几种类型的恶性肿瘤中,血细胞计数(BCC)标记物升高与预后不良有显著关联。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)是众所周知的廉价和有效的炎症条件代表性标志物。本研究旨在确定BCC作为膀胱癌(BC)患者RC后总生存(OS)的预测因素。方法采用回顾性队列研究方法,对26例行RC的患者进行回顾性研究。人口统计学特征和BCC标志物,如血红蛋白(Hb)。收集NLR、PLR和淋巴细胞/单核细胞比(LMR)。根据BCC标记值(³中位数和<中位数)对患者进行分类。Kaplan-Meier生存分析确定BCC标记物的总生存期(OS)。采用Mantel-Cox (Log-rank)方法确定患者人口统计学与一年生存率之间的关系。结果26例患者平均年龄为55.6±12.9岁。在单变量分析中,没有发现人口统计学特征是一年和总生存的显著预测因子(p < 0.05)。血红蛋白、NLR、PLR和LMR对1年生存率和OS无显著预测作用(p < 0.05)。结论BCC不是膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后患者生存的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Universa Medicina
Universa Medicina MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Secretome hypoxia-mesenchymal stem cells decrease tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-18 in kidney of type 2 diabetes mellitus model rats Protective role of melatonin in ultraviolet radiation- induced oxidative stress in human skin photoaging Correlation of angle kappa with biometry and higher-order aberrations of cataract patients at Prof. Ngoerah Hospital Ophthalmology Clinic Release of retromalleolar flexor retinaculum and combined flexor digitorum longus and flexor hallucis longus Z-plasty in checkrein deformity: a case report Profile of multidrug-resistant bacteria causing urinary tract infections in inpatients and outpatients in Jakarta and Tangerang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1