Reabilitação de déficits comunicativos pós-acidente vascular cerebral

Gigiane Gindri, Rochele Paz Fonseca
{"title":"Reabilitação de déficits comunicativos pós-acidente vascular cerebral","authors":"Gigiane Gindri, Rochele Paz Fonseca","doi":"10.1590/S1516-80342012000300021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discursive, lexical-semantic, pragmatic-inferential and/or prosodic communication processing may be impaired following a cerebrovascular accident. These deficits require intervention methods and programmes for effective communication rehabilitation. Within this context, the aim of this systematic review was to identify and describe methods used for neuropsychological rehabilitation of the communication of adults after a stroke, more specifically, systematic intervention approaches for each communication processing. Abstracts published in the last ten years were selected in PubMed, using keywords related to rehabilitation, stroke and communication. For the communication topic, we also used specific keywords related to the four communication processing components. Initially, 914 abstracts were found; after exclusion of the repeated studies, 460 were analyzed. Full texts were examined if the abstract evidenced that the study was empirical, included at least one post-stroke patient, focused in communication rehabilitation, presented pre- and post-intervention assessments, and if it was published in English, French or Portuguese within the last ten years. Only four empirical studies accomplished such criteria, being conducted mainly with aphasic or aprosodic patients. These findings might be considered surprising and alarming, since there is a lack of systematic studies about rehabilitation of communication components. It is important to highlight the need to search for a detailed description of intervention procedures with specific goals, allowing studies to be replicated and also contributing for monitoring the effects of treatment. Communicative processing intervention programmes should be developed based on theoretical approaches, and studies with this focus should be conducted and published, in order to verify therapeutic effects.","PeriodicalId":21204,"journal":{"name":"Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Fonoaudiologia","volume":"17 1","pages":"363-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/S1516-80342012000300021","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Fonoaudiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342012000300021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Discursive, lexical-semantic, pragmatic-inferential and/or prosodic communication processing may be impaired following a cerebrovascular accident. These deficits require intervention methods and programmes for effective communication rehabilitation. Within this context, the aim of this systematic review was to identify and describe methods used for neuropsychological rehabilitation of the communication of adults after a stroke, more specifically, systematic intervention approaches for each communication processing. Abstracts published in the last ten years were selected in PubMed, using keywords related to rehabilitation, stroke and communication. For the communication topic, we also used specific keywords related to the four communication processing components. Initially, 914 abstracts were found; after exclusion of the repeated studies, 460 were analyzed. Full texts were examined if the abstract evidenced that the study was empirical, included at least one post-stroke patient, focused in communication rehabilitation, presented pre- and post-intervention assessments, and if it was published in English, French or Portuguese within the last ten years. Only four empirical studies accomplished such criteria, being conducted mainly with aphasic or aprosodic patients. These findings might be considered surprising and alarming, since there is a lack of systematic studies about rehabilitation of communication components. It is important to highlight the need to search for a detailed description of intervention procedures with specific goals, allowing studies to be replicated and also contributing for monitoring the effects of treatment. Communicative processing intervention programmes should be developed based on theoretical approaches, and studies with this focus should be conducted and published, in order to verify therapeutic effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风后沟通缺陷的康复
在脑血管事故后,话语、词汇-语义、语用-推理和/或韵律的沟通加工可能受损。这些缺陷需要干预方法和方案,以便有效地恢复沟通。在此背景下,本系统综述的目的是确定和描述用于中风后成人沟通的神经心理康复的方法,更具体地说,是针对每个沟通处理的系统干预方法。在PubMed中选取近十年发表的摘要,使用康复、中风和交流相关的关键词。对于通信主题,我们也使用了与四个通信处理组件相关的特定关键词。最初,共发现914篇摘要;在排除重复研究后,对460项研究进行了分析。全文被检查是否摘要证明该研究是经验性的,包括至少一名中风后患者,专注于沟通康复,提出干预前和干预后的评估,以及是否在过去十年内以英语,法语或葡萄牙语发表。只有四项实证研究完成了这些标准,主要是针对失语或非酒精性患者进行的。这些发现可能被认为是令人惊讶和震惊的,因为缺乏关于通信成分康复的系统研究。重要的是要强调需要寻找具有特定目标的干预程序的详细描述,使研究能够被复制,并有助于监测治疗效果。交际处理干预方案应基于理论方法制定,并应开展和发表这方面的研究,以验证治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparação dos estímulos clique e CE-chirp® no registro do Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico Tipos de erros de fala em crianças com transtorno fonológico em função do histórico de otite média Ocorrência de dessonorização no desvio fonológico: relação com fonemas mais acometidos, gravidade do desvio e idade Grau de quantidade de fala e intensidade vocal de teleoperadores em ambiente laboral e extralaboral A efetividade dos testes complementares no acompanhamento da intervenção terapêutica no transtorno fonológico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1