Reaction time and stress tolerance of police officers in specific and non-specific tests in professional self-defence training

IF 0.8 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Physical Activity Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.16926/PAR.2019.07.23
M. Vít, Miloslav Houdek, M. Sebera
{"title":"Reaction time and stress tolerance of police officers in specific and non-specific tests in professional self-defence training","authors":"M. Vít, Miloslav Houdek, M. Sebera","doi":"10.16926/PAR.2019.07.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The police forces performance is demanding on well-timed and quick reaction. Single reaction time and choice reaction time are crucial when the jeopardy appears. Performing under stress in life-threatening situations needs a good level of stress tolerance. In our study, we used two nonspecific, and two specific (shooting) tests to analyse the reactivity of police officer under different conditions. Material and methods: The research sample consisted of n=18 male Czech police training instructors. The group is unique as these police officers are specialised in the professional self-defence with focus on the coercive means use and shooting skills. Two standardized non-specific tests administrated with the Vienna Test System (VTS) by Schuhfried GmbH were used for data gathering. Single reaction time (SRT) was measured by the Reaction test, stress tolerance and choice reaction time (CRT) was measured by the Determination test. Two practical non-standardized shooting tests were used for the reactivity analysis in the goal oriented environment (shooting range). Results: The single reaction time among police training instructors was M=261.56±33.60 ms, which corresponds to the 66.28 percentile of age norm. Performance in the stress tolerance test also matches the average performance in population (M=45.56 percentile of correct reactions, M=61.67 percentile of incorrect reactions, M=51.44 percentile of skipped signals). According to the Pearson correlation coefficient, there is no correlation between single reaction time in the Reaction test and choice reaction time in the Determination test (r=-0.03). There is no correlation between single reaction time in the nonspecific Reaction test and performance in the specific Shooting test 1 (r=0.06) and Shooting test 2 (r=-0.01). Conclusions: There is no relation between the results in the specific and non-specific reaction tests. Nonspecific tests of single reaction time and choice reaction time are suitable for a general assessment of motor abilities. Specific tasks need specific training and specific evaluation methods.","PeriodicalId":43466,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity Review","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/PAR.2019.07.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: The police forces performance is demanding on well-timed and quick reaction. Single reaction time and choice reaction time are crucial when the jeopardy appears. Performing under stress in life-threatening situations needs a good level of stress tolerance. In our study, we used two nonspecific, and two specific (shooting) tests to analyse the reactivity of police officer under different conditions. Material and methods: The research sample consisted of n=18 male Czech police training instructors. The group is unique as these police officers are specialised in the professional self-defence with focus on the coercive means use and shooting skills. Two standardized non-specific tests administrated with the Vienna Test System (VTS) by Schuhfried GmbH were used for data gathering. Single reaction time (SRT) was measured by the Reaction test, stress tolerance and choice reaction time (CRT) was measured by the Determination test. Two practical non-standardized shooting tests were used for the reactivity analysis in the goal oriented environment (shooting range). Results: The single reaction time among police training instructors was M=261.56±33.60 ms, which corresponds to the 66.28 percentile of age norm. Performance in the stress tolerance test also matches the average performance in population (M=45.56 percentile of correct reactions, M=61.67 percentile of incorrect reactions, M=51.44 percentile of skipped signals). According to the Pearson correlation coefficient, there is no correlation between single reaction time in the Reaction test and choice reaction time in the Determination test (r=-0.03). There is no correlation between single reaction time in the nonspecific Reaction test and performance in the specific Shooting test 1 (r=0.06) and Shooting test 2 (r=-0.01). Conclusions: There is no relation between the results in the specific and non-specific reaction tests. Nonspecific tests of single reaction time and choice reaction time are suitable for a general assessment of motor abilities. Specific tasks need specific training and specific evaluation methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察在专业自卫训练中特定和非特定测试中的反应时间和压力耐受力
导言:警察部队的表现要求及时和快速的反应。当危险出现时,单一反应时间和选择反应时间至关重要。在威胁生命的情况下表现需要良好的压力承受能力。在我们的研究中,我们使用两个非特异性和两个特异性(射击)测试来分析警察在不同条件下的反应性。材料与方法:研究样本为18名捷克男性警察培训指导员。这支队伍是独一无二的,因为这些警察专门从事专业自卫,重点是强制手段的使用和射击技巧。采用Schuhfried GmbH的维也纳测试系统(VTS)管理的两个标准化非特异性测试用于数据收集。单次反应时间(SRT)采用反应测试,应激耐受性和选择反应时间(CRT)采用测定测试。在目标导向环境(射击场)中,采用两个实际的非标准化射击试验进行反应性分析。结果:警察培训指导员的单次反应时间M=261.56±33.60 ms,符合年龄常模的66.28个百分位数;在应力耐受性测试中的表现也与群体中的平均表现相匹配(正确反应的M=45.56百分位数,错误反应的M=61.67百分位数,跳过信号的M=51.44百分位数)。根据Pearson相关系数,反应检验中的单次反应时间与决定检验中的选择反应时间之间不存在相关性(r=-0.03)。非特异性反应试验的单次反应时间与特异性射击试验1 (r=0.06)和射击试验2 (r=-0.01)的表现无相关性。结论:特异性和非特异性反应试验结果无相关性。单一反应时间和选择反应时间的非特异性测试适用于运动能力的一般评估。具体的任务需要具体的培训和具体的评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Activity Review
Physical Activity Review SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Activity Review aims to facilitate and enhance communication across all sub-disciplines of the sport sciences. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, applied to sport and exercise. Subject areas suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields: Sport Science Sport Pedagogy Physiology Biomechanics Sports theory and history Different aspects of martial arts Recreation and tourism Physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
The variability of strength production capacities during a judo contest Conception of effective mass and effect of force – measurement of taekwon-do master Model of the mediating effect of team pride in the relationship between transformational leadership and sports activity loyalty The influence of core stability exercises programme on the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system in girls practising volleyball A comparative evaluation of anthropometric characteristics and respiratory functions' parameters among rugby and soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1