{"title":"Association between Gingival Biotype and Crestal Bone Loss in Implants Placed in Anterior Maxilla.","authors":"K Akshaya, Arvina Rajasekar","doi":"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2023045450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When bone loss occurs around an implant, it can cause esthetic compromise, which might affect the tissue level design. Thus, bone level design implants are usually preferred if a natural emergence profile is important. The gingival biotype had been identified as a significant factor in the stability of crestal bone.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the current study is to analyze the gingival biotype and crestal bone in implants placed in anterior maxilla.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>retrospective study was conducted using the case records of patients in University Hospital. Data on the gingival biotype and crestal bone loss in implants placed in anterior maxilla were collected (sample size = 96 patients) and analyzed for association with age and gender by descriptive statistics and chi-square association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In thick gingival biotype 59.3% of the cases showed no crestal bone loss and 5.2% of the patients showed only 1 mm of bone loss, but in case of thin gingival biotype, 16.6% of patients had 1 mm of bone loss, 5.2% of them has 2 mm of bone loss, and 1% of them had bone loss of 3 mm and above, with a significant p value of 0.02 (less than 0.05) showing a strong association between gingival biotype and crestal bone loss around implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It can be concluded that there exists a significant association between gingival biotype and crestal bone loss around implants placed in anterior maxilla.</p>","PeriodicalId":16125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","volume":"1 1","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2023045450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: When bone loss occurs around an implant, it can cause esthetic compromise, which might affect the tissue level design. Thus, bone level design implants are usually preferred if a natural emergence profile is important. The gingival biotype had been identified as a significant factor in the stability of crestal bone.
Aim: The aim of the current study is to analyze the gingival biotype and crestal bone in implants placed in anterior maxilla.
Materials and methods: retrospective study was conducted using the case records of patients in University Hospital. Data on the gingival biotype and crestal bone loss in implants placed in anterior maxilla were collected (sample size = 96 patients) and analyzed for association with age and gender by descriptive statistics and chi-square association.
Results: In thick gingival biotype 59.3% of the cases showed no crestal bone loss and 5.2% of the patients showed only 1 mm of bone loss, but in case of thin gingival biotype, 16.6% of patients had 1 mm of bone loss, 5.2% of them has 2 mm of bone loss, and 1% of them had bone loss of 3 mm and above, with a significant p value of 0.02 (less than 0.05) showing a strong association between gingival biotype and crestal bone loss around implants.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that there exists a significant association between gingival biotype and crestal bone loss around implants placed in anterior maxilla.
期刊介绍:
MEDICAL IMPLANTS are being used in every organ of the human body. Ideally, medical implants must have biomechanical properties comparable to those of autogenous tissues without any adverse effects. In each anatomic site, studies of the long-term effects of medical implants must be undertaken to determine accurately the safety and performance of the implants. Today, implant surgery has become an interdisciplinary undertaking involving a number of skilled and gifted specialists. For example, successful cochlear implants will involve audiologists, audiological physicians, speech and language therapists, otolaryngologists, nurses, neuro-otologists, teachers of the deaf, hearing therapists, cochlear implant manufacturers, and others involved with hearing-impaired and deaf individuals.