Taekwondo Poomsae Competitor Perceptions of the Official and New Competition Poomsae, Field of Play, and Competition Rules

IF 0.8 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Physical Activity Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.16926/par.2019.07.04
Byung-Kee Chung, J. A. Johnson
{"title":"Taekwondo Poomsae Competitor Perceptions of the Official and New Competition Poomsae, Field of Play, and Competition Rules","authors":"Byung-Kee Chung, J. A. Johnson","doi":"10.16926/par.2019.07.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ten new Taekwondo poomsae (forms) were introduced for competition (including the then-named poomsae Himchari, Saebyeol, Bigak, and Nareusya) prior to their inclusion in the 2018 Asian Games in Jakarta, Indonesia. To determine general satisfaction of the current poomsae competition rules, field of play, official poomsae, and new poomsae, a survey of Asia Taekwondo Union poomsae competitors (n=91), coaches (n=33), and referees (n=100) was conducted. A total of 224 respondents completed the survey, but only 193 surveys were viable. Results of this study indicate a positive perception of current competition rules (70%; n=139); field of play (74.6%; n=144); official poomsae (16.5%; n=32); and the new poomsae (Himchari: 73.6%; n=142), (Saebyeol: 73.6%; n=142), (Bigak: 76.7.2%; n=148), and (Nareusya: 72%; n=139). This study should assist Taekwondo governing bodies in establishing practical strategies for the future of poomsae competitions. Numerous conclusions were drawn from this study, but most notably are that athletes, coaches, and referees had little problems with the “old” poomsae but also welcome the new, more challenging ones. This suggests that the respondents understand the value of the original official poomsae and appreciate the challenges that the new poomsae offer. The new poomsae can be said to illustrate how Taekwondo is growing positively while remaining true to its roots.","PeriodicalId":43466,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2019.07.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Ten new Taekwondo poomsae (forms) were introduced for competition (including the then-named poomsae Himchari, Saebyeol, Bigak, and Nareusya) prior to their inclusion in the 2018 Asian Games in Jakarta, Indonesia. To determine general satisfaction of the current poomsae competition rules, field of play, official poomsae, and new poomsae, a survey of Asia Taekwondo Union poomsae competitors (n=91), coaches (n=33), and referees (n=100) was conducted. A total of 224 respondents completed the survey, but only 193 surveys were viable. Results of this study indicate a positive perception of current competition rules (70%; n=139); field of play (74.6%; n=144); official poomsae (16.5%; n=32); and the new poomsae (Himchari: 73.6%; n=142), (Saebyeol: 73.6%; n=142), (Bigak: 76.7.2%; n=148), and (Nareusya: 72%; n=139). This study should assist Taekwondo governing bodies in establishing practical strategies for the future of poomsae competitions. Numerous conclusions were drawn from this study, but most notably are that athletes, coaches, and referees had little problems with the “old” poomsae but also welcome the new, more challenging ones. This suggests that the respondents understand the value of the original official poomsae and appreciate the challenges that the new poomsae offer. The new poomsae can be said to illustrate how Taekwondo is growing positively while remaining true to its roots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跆拳道运动员对官方和新比赛的看法,比赛场地,和比赛规则
在2018年印度尼西亚雅加达亚运会之前,引进了10种新的跆拳道poomsae(形式)(包括当时的poomsae Himchari, Saebyeol, Bigak和Nareusya)。为了确定对现行普扑赛比赛规则、比赛场地、正式普扑赛和新普扑赛的总体满意度,对亚洲跆拳道联盟普扑赛选手(n=91)、教练员(n=33)和裁判员(n=100)进行了调查。共有224名受访者完成了调查,但只有193项调查是可行的。本研究的结果表明,对当前竞争规则的积极看法(70%;n = 139);比赛场地(74.6%;n = 144);官方poomsae (16.5%;n = 32);新poomsae (Himchari: 73.6%;n=142), (Saebyeol: 73.6%;n=142), (Bigak: 76.7.2%;n=148), (Nareusya: 72%;n = 139)。这项研究将有助于跆拳道管理机构为未来的poomsae比赛制定实用的策略。从这项研究中得出了许多结论,但最值得注意的是,运动员、教练和裁判对“旧”的poomsae没有什么问题,但他们也欢迎新的、更具挑战性的poomsae。这表明受访者了解原始官方poomsae的价值,并欣赏新poomsae提供的挑战。可以说,跆拳道在保持本源的同时,也在积极成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Activity Review
Physical Activity Review SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Activity Review aims to facilitate and enhance communication across all sub-disciplines of the sport sciences. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, applied to sport and exercise. Subject areas suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields: Sport Science Sport Pedagogy Physiology Biomechanics Sports theory and history Different aspects of martial arts Recreation and tourism Physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
The variability of strength production capacities during a judo contest Conception of effective mass and effect of force – measurement of taekwon-do master Model of the mediating effect of team pride in the relationship between transformational leadership and sports activity loyalty The influence of core stability exercises programme on the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system in girls practising volleyball A comparative evaluation of anthropometric characteristics and respiratory functions' parameters among rugby and soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1