The effect comparison of foam rolling and dynamic stretching on performance in motion tests by young volleyball players: a pilot study

IF 0.8 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Physical Activity Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.16926/par.2022.10.28
J. Popelka, Pavol Pivovarniček
{"title":"The effect comparison of foam rolling and dynamic stretching on performance in motion tests by young volleyball players: a pilot study","authors":"J. Popelka, Pavol Pivovarniček","doi":"10.16926/par.2022.10.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the pilot study was an effect comparison of stretching between foam rolling and dynamic stretching on performance in motion tests by young volleyball players. Methods: 1. Experimental sample – ESFR (n=8, age = 13.4±0.5 years, height = 173.8±7.7 cm, weight = 59.8±7.1 kg) absolved 6 measurements of indicators of stretching with foam rolling during 6 weeks. 2. Experimental sample – ESDS (n=8, age = 13.4±0.5 years, height = 174.5±9.5 cm, weight = 59.4±11.0 kg) absolved dynamic stretching. We had determined the stretching effect between ESFR and ESDS by comparison of performance in tests: spike jump (SS), block jump (BS) E-test (ET), run to cones (RC), throw with 1 kg ball (H2), sit and reach test (SR) and sit-ups (SU). Results: The most important determination was that better level of stretching presented in performance and it was determined in RC in two examples with medium effect and in three examples with large effect in behalf of ESFR. By contrast, one example from ESDS in parameter PS had better level of stretching with medium effect and one example with medium effect in H2. In other parameters (BS, SS, SU and ET) were the differences only small or none between ESFR and ESDS. Conclusion: The results of the pilot study indicate that using of foam rolling and dynamic stretching can have different influence on the level of stretching and preparation of young volleyball players. These results must be verified on larger experimental sample.","PeriodicalId":43466,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2022.10.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the pilot study was an effect comparison of stretching between foam rolling and dynamic stretching on performance in motion tests by young volleyball players. Methods: 1. Experimental sample – ESFR (n=8, age = 13.4±0.5 years, height = 173.8±7.7 cm, weight = 59.8±7.1 kg) absolved 6 measurements of indicators of stretching with foam rolling during 6 weeks. 2. Experimental sample – ESDS (n=8, age = 13.4±0.5 years, height = 174.5±9.5 cm, weight = 59.4±11.0 kg) absolved dynamic stretching. We had determined the stretching effect between ESFR and ESDS by comparison of performance in tests: spike jump (SS), block jump (BS) E-test (ET), run to cones (RC), throw with 1 kg ball (H2), sit and reach test (SR) and sit-ups (SU). Results: The most important determination was that better level of stretching presented in performance and it was determined in RC in two examples with medium effect and in three examples with large effect in behalf of ESFR. By contrast, one example from ESDS in parameter PS had better level of stretching with medium effect and one example with medium effect in H2. In other parameters (BS, SS, SU and ET) were the differences only small or none between ESFR and ESDS. Conclusion: The results of the pilot study indicate that using of foam rolling and dynamic stretching can have different influence on the level of stretching and preparation of young volleyball players. These results must be verified on larger experimental sample.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泡沫滚动和动态拉伸对青少年排球运动员运动测试成绩影响的比较:一项初步研究
前言:本初步研究的目的是比较泡沫拉伸和动态拉伸对青少年排球运动员运动测试成绩的影响。方法:1。实验样本ESFR (n=8,年龄= 13.4±0.5岁,身高= 173.8±7.7 cm,体重= 59.8±7.1 kg)在6周内免除了6项泡沫滚动拉伸指标。2. 实验样本- ESDS (n=8,年龄= 13.4±0.5岁,身高= 174.5±9.5 cm,体重= 59.4±11.0 kg)绝对动态拉伸。通过扣球起跳(SS)、挡跳(BS) E-test (ET)、跑锥(RC)、1公斤投球(H2)、仰卧起坐(SR)和仰卧起坐(SU)测试中的表现比较,确定了ESFR和ESDS之间的拉伸效果。结果:最重要的决定是在表现中表现出更好的拉伸水平,在RC中确定了两个中等效果的例子和三个代表ESFR的大效果的例子。相比之下,参数PS中有1例ESDS拉伸效果较好,H2中有1例ESDS拉伸效果较好。在其他参数(BS、SS、SU和ET)中,ESFR和ESDS之间的差异很小或没有差异。结论:初步研究结果表明,泡沫滚动和动态拉伸对青少年排球运动员的拉伸和准备水平有不同程度的影响。这些结果必须在更大的实验样本上进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Activity Review
Physical Activity Review SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Activity Review aims to facilitate and enhance communication across all sub-disciplines of the sport sciences. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, applied to sport and exercise. Subject areas suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields: Sport Science Sport Pedagogy Physiology Biomechanics Sports theory and history Different aspects of martial arts Recreation and tourism Physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
The variability of strength production capacities during a judo contest Conception of effective mass and effect of force – measurement of taekwon-do master Model of the mediating effect of team pride in the relationship between transformational leadership and sports activity loyalty The influence of core stability exercises programme on the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system in girls practising volleyball A comparative evaluation of anthropometric characteristics and respiratory functions' parameters among rugby and soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1