Pro-social and antisocial values in physical education.The validity and reliability of fair play questionnaire in physical education (FPQ-PE) into Albanian language

IF 0.8 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Physical Activity Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.16926/par.2019.07.17
Eridiola Buzi, J. Jarani, E. Isidori
{"title":"Pro-social and antisocial values in physical education.The validity and reliability of fair play questionnaire in physical education (FPQ-PE) into Albanian language","authors":"Eridiola Buzi, J. Jarani, E. Isidori","doi":"10.16926/par.2019.07.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fair Play behaviours are moral and social behaviours that can be acquire from students throughout PE class. The main aim of this study was to translate and validate into Albanian language the questionnaire that measures and evaluate pro-social and antisocial behaviours in PE class. Material and methods: The process of validity was based in three steps: 1) Translation and Back Translation the questionnaire was translated from experts of the field who were proficient in English language, and the process of back translation was done from experts of Albanian and English language. 2) Factor Analysis 597 middle school students from Tirana, Albania, were involved, from which a simple size of 280 students (mean age=13.22±1.22 yr) was used to perform the EFA, and reliability, reporting the CA coefficient. For the CFA a sample size of 317 students (mean age=14.32±7.3 yr) was used. 3) Test-Retest Validitythe questionnaire was submitted to the same students as EFA in two times with an interval of 3 weeks between them. Results: Regarding Factor Analysis the KMO> than 0.5 and Bartlett's Test < 0.01 (KMO-0.820, χ2=1153.330; p=0.000), have indicated that the EFA could be performed. EFA has revealed that there were four factors, two for pro-social and two for antisocial. The CA coefficient for the four factors was: respect conventions (α=0.683), respect towards teammates (α=0.616), cheating (α=0.765) and gamesmanship (α=0.742). The CFA has indicated a good model fit (χ2=196.68, df=84, p=0.000, RMSEA = 0.065, SRMR = 0.056 and CFI=0.92). Regarding test-retest validity there were no significant differences between test and retest measures, when test (M=44.26±5.13) and retest (M=44.09±5.76) conditions; t(279)=0.52 (p=0.600). Conclusions: According to the results of our study, the questionnaire has shown reliability on measuring pro-social and antisocial behaviours in PE class. Therefore, the questionnaire can be used as an effective tool to help Albanian PE teachers and sports educators to understand the social and educational values dealing with sport in Albanian schools.","PeriodicalId":43466,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2019.07.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Fair Play behaviours are moral and social behaviours that can be acquire from students throughout PE class. The main aim of this study was to translate and validate into Albanian language the questionnaire that measures and evaluate pro-social and antisocial behaviours in PE class. Material and methods: The process of validity was based in three steps: 1) Translation and Back Translation the questionnaire was translated from experts of the field who were proficient in English language, and the process of back translation was done from experts of Albanian and English language. 2) Factor Analysis 597 middle school students from Tirana, Albania, were involved, from which a simple size of 280 students (mean age=13.22±1.22 yr) was used to perform the EFA, and reliability, reporting the CA coefficient. For the CFA a sample size of 317 students (mean age=14.32±7.3 yr) was used. 3) Test-Retest Validitythe questionnaire was submitted to the same students as EFA in two times with an interval of 3 weeks between them. Results: Regarding Factor Analysis the KMO> than 0.5 and Bartlett's Test < 0.01 (KMO-0.820, χ2=1153.330; p=0.000), have indicated that the EFA could be performed. EFA has revealed that there were four factors, two for pro-social and two for antisocial. The CA coefficient for the four factors was: respect conventions (α=0.683), respect towards teammates (α=0.616), cheating (α=0.765) and gamesmanship (α=0.742). The CFA has indicated a good model fit (χ2=196.68, df=84, p=0.000, RMSEA = 0.065, SRMR = 0.056 and CFI=0.92). Regarding test-retest validity there were no significant differences between test and retest measures, when test (M=44.26±5.13) and retest (M=44.09±5.76) conditions; t(279)=0.52 (p=0.600). Conclusions: According to the results of our study, the questionnaire has shown reliability on measuring pro-social and antisocial behaviours in PE class. Therefore, the questionnaire can be used as an effective tool to help Albanian PE teachers and sports educators to understand the social and educational values dealing with sport in Albanian schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育教育中的亲社会价值观与反社会价值观。阿尔巴尼亚语体育公平竞赛问卷(FPQ-PE)的效度和信度
简介:公平竞赛行为是学生在体育课中可以习得的道德和社会行为。本研究的主要目的是将体育课堂亲社会行为和反社会行为的测量和评价问卷翻译并验证为阿尔巴尼亚语。材料与方法:效度过程分为三个步骤:1)翻译与反译问卷由精通英语的领域专家翻译,反译过程由阿尔巴尼亚语和英语专家完成。2)因子分析:以阿尔巴尼亚地拉那市597名中学生为研究对象,采用280名学生(平均年龄=13.22±1.22岁)进行EFA,信度报告CA系数。CFA的样本量为317名学生(平均年龄=14.32±7.3岁)。3)重测效度问卷与EFA分两次提交给同一学生,每次间隔3周。结果:因子分析中KMO> < 0.5, Bartlett检验< 0.01 (KMO-0.820, χ2=1153.330;p=0.000),表明可以进行EFA。EFA揭示了四个因素,两个是亲社会的,两个是反社会的。四个因素的CA系数分别为:尊重约定(α=0.683)、尊重队友(α=0.616)、作弊(α=0.765)和游戏技巧(α=0.742)。CFA表明模型拟合良好(χ2=196.68, df=84, p=0.000, RMSEA = 0.065, SRMR = 0.056, CFI=0.92)。在重测效度方面,当测试(M=44.26±5.13)和重测(M=44.09±5.76)时,测试和重测措施之间无显著差异;t (279) = 0.52 (p = 0.600)。结论:根据研究结果,问卷在测量体育课亲社会行为和反社会行为方面具有一定的信度。因此,问卷可以作为一个有效的工具,帮助阿尔巴尼亚体育教师和体育教育工作者了解阿尔巴尼亚学校与体育有关的社会和教育价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Activity Review
Physical Activity Review SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Activity Review aims to facilitate and enhance communication across all sub-disciplines of the sport sciences. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, applied to sport and exercise. Subject areas suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields: Sport Science Sport Pedagogy Physiology Biomechanics Sports theory and history Different aspects of martial arts Recreation and tourism Physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
The variability of strength production capacities during a judo contest Conception of effective mass and effect of force – measurement of taekwon-do master Model of the mediating effect of team pride in the relationship between transformational leadership and sports activity loyalty The influence of core stability exercises programme on the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system in girls practising volleyball A comparative evaluation of anthropometric characteristics and respiratory functions' parameters among rugby and soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1