Potential structures for CO 2 geological storage in the Baltic Sea: Case study offshore Latvia

IF 1.3 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOLOGY Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland Pub Date : 2013-06-01 DOI:10.17741/BGSF/85.1.005
K. Shogenov, A. Shogenova, O. Vizika-kavvadias
{"title":"Potential structures for CO 2 geological storage in the Baltic Sea: Case study offshore Latvia","authors":"K. Shogenov, A. Shogenova, O. Vizika-kavvadias","doi":"10.17741/BGSF/85.1.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is focused on two structures in the Baltic offshore region (E6 and E7 structures in Latvia) prospective for the geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2). Their CO2 storage capacities were estimated recently with different levels of reliability. Petrophysical, geophysical, mineralogical and geochemical parameters of reservoir rocks represented by quartz sandstones of the Deimena Formation of Middle Cambrian in two wells and properties of Silurian and Ordovician cap rocks were additionally studied and interpreted in the present contribution. Extended methodology on rock measurements and estimation of conservative and optimistic storage capacity are presented. Uncertainties and risks of CO2 storage in the offshore structure E6 estimated as the most prospective for CO2 geological storage in the Baltic Region, and the largest among all onshore and offshore structures studied in Latvia, were discussed. We re-estimated the previous optimistic capacity of the E6 structure (265–630 Mt) to 251–602 Mt. Considering fault system within the E6 structure we estimated capacity of two compartments of the reservoir separately (E6-A and E6-B). Estimated by the optimistic approach CO2 storage capacity of the E6-A part was 243–582 Mt (mean 365 Mt) and E6-B part 8–20 Mt (mean 12 Mt). Conservative capacity was 97–233 Mt (mean 146 Mt) in the E6-A, and 4–10 Mt (mean 6 Mt) in the E6-B. The conservative average capacity of the E6-B part was in the same range as this capacity in the E7 structure (6 and 7 Mt respectively). The total capacity of the two structures E6 and E7, estimated using the optimistic approach was on average 411 Mt, and using the conservative approach, 159 Mt.","PeriodicalId":55302,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17741/BGSF/85.1.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study is focused on two structures in the Baltic offshore region (E6 and E7 structures in Latvia) prospective for the geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2). Their CO2 storage capacities were estimated recently with different levels of reliability. Petrophysical, geophysical, mineralogical and geochemical parameters of reservoir rocks represented by quartz sandstones of the Deimena Formation of Middle Cambrian in two wells and properties of Silurian and Ordovician cap rocks were additionally studied and interpreted in the present contribution. Extended methodology on rock measurements and estimation of conservative and optimistic storage capacity are presented. Uncertainties and risks of CO2 storage in the offshore structure E6 estimated as the most prospective for CO2 geological storage in the Baltic Region, and the largest among all onshore and offshore structures studied in Latvia, were discussed. We re-estimated the previous optimistic capacity of the E6 structure (265–630 Mt) to 251–602 Mt. Considering fault system within the E6 structure we estimated capacity of two compartments of the reservoir separately (E6-A and E6-B). Estimated by the optimistic approach CO2 storage capacity of the E6-A part was 243–582 Mt (mean 365 Mt) and E6-B part 8–20 Mt (mean 12 Mt). Conservative capacity was 97–233 Mt (mean 146 Mt) in the E6-A, and 4–10 Mt (mean 6 Mt) in the E6-B. The conservative average capacity of the E6-B part was in the same range as this capacity in the E7 structure (6 and 7 Mt respectively). The total capacity of the two structures E6 and E7, estimated using the optimistic approach was on average 411 Mt, and using the conservative approach, 159 Mt.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波罗的海二氧化碳地质储存的潜在结构:拉脱维亚近海的案例研究
本研究的重点是波罗的海近海地区的两个结构(拉脱维亚的E6和E7结构)对二氧化碳地质储存的前景。最近对它们的二氧化碳储存能力进行了不同程度的可靠性评估。本文还研究和解释了以中寒武统Deimena组石英砂岩为代表的两口井储集岩的岩石物理、地球物理、矿物学和地球化学参数以及志留系和奥陶系盖层的性质。提出了岩石测量和保守和乐观储存量估算的扩展方法。讨论了海上结构E6中二氧化碳储存的不确定性和风险,E6被认为是波罗的海地区最有前景的二氧化碳地质储存,也是拉脱维亚研究的所有陆上和海上结构中最大的。我们将E6构造的乐观容量(265 ~ 630 Mt)重新估计为251 ~ 602 Mt。考虑到E6构造内的断裂系统,我们分别估计了E6- a和E6- b两个储层的容量。根据乐观方法估计,E6-A部分的二氧化碳储存能力为2.43 - 5.82亿吨(平均3.65亿吨),E6-B部分为8-20亿吨(平均12亿吨)。E6-A的保守容量为97-233公吨(平均146公吨),E6-B的保守容量为4-10公吨(平均6公吨)。E6-B部件的保守平均容量与E7结构的容量相同(分别为6 Mt和7 Mt)。采用乐观方法估计的E6和E7两个结构的总容量平均为4.11 Mt,采用保守方法估计的总容量平均为1.59 Mt。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland (BGSF) publishes research articles and short communications in all branches of geosciences. Contributions from outside Finland are welcome, provided that they contain material relevant to Finnish geology or are of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Ice-marginal ridge relief complex in northern Kola Peninsula (NW Russia): morphology, structure, and genetic interpretation Predicting potential pollutant release from waste rock at the abandoned Beck mine (Karelia, Russia) by equilibrium kinetic modeling The composition of apatite in the Archean Siilinjärvi glimmerite-carbonatite complex in eastern Finland 1.88 Ga granitoids at Sorsakoski, Central Finland: A-type magmatism within the Raahe-Ladoga suture zone Secular change of tectonic setting in the Archean Takanen greenstone belt, northeastern Karelia Province, Fennoscandian Shield
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1