"Et in Arcadia fracta ego". Ponowoczesna entopia Toma Stopparda

Mariusz Bartosiak
{"title":"\"Et in Arcadia fracta ego\". Ponowoczesna entopia Toma Stopparda","authors":"Mariusz Bartosiak","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.17.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a complex analysis of “Arcadia” by Tom Stoppard as an example of the postmodern artistic strategy that reinterprets traditional myth and themes within the context of dynamical changes in the cultural discourse of the last few decades. At the same time, it applies theories of contemporary natural sciences in the construction of characters, scenery and dramatic plot. The paper argues that such artistic strategy aims at the topoi koinoi of the anthropologically conceived culture and technologically oriented civilization. The analysis of Stoppard’s drama is set within two contexts: 1) the historical bifurcations of ancient (Theocritus, Virgil) and modern (Phillip Sidney, Nicolas Poussin) interpretations of the Arcadian myth; 2) the basic notions of chaos theory that are suggested in the dialogues and, at the same time, are applied in the construction of dramatic plot and its representation (bifurcation, attractor). The notion of entopia (‘in-place’), as opposed to the pair of utopia and dystopia, which are usually connected with interpretations of the myth of Arcadia as a desirable or undesirable ‘no-place’, refers to the ‘Arcadian’ aspects and possibilities of living, and especially to the acting here and now. In this respect, the paper argues that Stoppard’s “Arcadia” provides a mental space for the recognition of anthropological and axiological (performative) determinants of contemporary ‘Arcadian’ entopia.","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collectanea Philologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.17.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents a complex analysis of “Arcadia” by Tom Stoppard as an example of the postmodern artistic strategy that reinterprets traditional myth and themes within the context of dynamical changes in the cultural discourse of the last few decades. At the same time, it applies theories of contemporary natural sciences in the construction of characters, scenery and dramatic plot. The paper argues that such artistic strategy aims at the topoi koinoi of the anthropologically conceived culture and technologically oriented civilization. The analysis of Stoppard’s drama is set within two contexts: 1) the historical bifurcations of ancient (Theocritus, Virgil) and modern (Phillip Sidney, Nicolas Poussin) interpretations of the Arcadian myth; 2) the basic notions of chaos theory that are suggested in the dialogues and, at the same time, are applied in the construction of dramatic plot and its representation (bifurcation, attractor). The notion of entopia (‘in-place’), as opposed to the pair of utopia and dystopia, which are usually connected with interpretations of the myth of Arcadia as a desirable or undesirable ‘no-place’, refers to the ‘Arcadian’ aspects and possibilities of living, and especially to the acting here and now. In this respect, the paper argues that Stoppard’s “Arcadia” provides a mental space for the recognition of anthropological and axiological (performative) determinants of contemporary ‘Arcadian’ entopia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等在阿卡迪亚破碎自我。汤姆·斯托帕德的现代随身听
本文对汤姆·斯托帕德的《阿卡迪亚》进行了复杂的分析,将其作为后现代艺术策略的一个例子,在过去几十年文化话语的动态变化背景下重新诠释传统神话和主题。同时,将当代自然科学理论运用到人物、场景、情节的建构中。本文认为,这种艺术策略是针对人类学文化和技术导向文明的主题。对斯托帕德戏剧的分析是在两个语境下进行的:1)古代(泰奥克里托斯、维吉尔)和现代(菲利普·西德尼、尼古拉斯·普桑)对阿卡迪亚神话的历史解读的分歧;2)对话中提出的混沌理论的基本概念,同时应用于戏剧情节的构建及其表现(分岔、吸引子)。与乌托邦和反乌托邦这两个概念相反,乌托邦和反乌托邦通常与将阿卡迪亚神话解释为理想或不理想的“无地”有关,它指的是生活的“阿卡迪亚”方面和可能性,尤其是此时此地的行为。在这方面,本文认为斯托帕德的“阿卡迪亚”为认识当代“阿卡迪亚”乌托邦的人类学和价值论(表演)决定因素提供了一个精神空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sic undique fulgor percussit. Ekfraza w VII eklodze Kalpurniusza Sykulusa Problem winy i odpowiedzialności za zbrodnię w Orestesie Eurypidesa Owidiusz, Amory III 1 w polskim przekładzie Cicero und Andokides O religii starożytnych Germanów. Komentarze do księgi VII Geografii Strabona
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1