Uncovering Indigenous Worlds and Histories on a Bend of a New England River before the 1650s: Problematizing Nomenclature and Settler Colonial History, Deep History, and Early Colonization Narratives

Christoph Strobel
{"title":"Uncovering Indigenous Worlds and Histories on a Bend of a New England River before the 1650s: Problematizing Nomenclature and Settler Colonial History, Deep History, and Early Colonization Narratives","authors":"Christoph Strobel","doi":"10.18422/69-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay explores the often-ignored histories of the indigenous people who resided on the confluence of the Merrimack and the Concord rivers up to the 1650s. This place is characterized by a significant bend in the Merrimack River as it changes its southerly flow into an easterly direction. Today, the area includes the modern city of Lowell, Massachusetts, and its surroundings. While the 1650s saw the creation of a Native American “praying town” and the incorporation of the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s towns of Chelmsford and Billerica, it is the diverse and complex indigenous past before this decade which North American and global historians tend to neglect. The pre-colonial and early colonial eras, and how observers have described these periods, have shaped the way we understand history today. This essay problematizes terminology, looks at how amateur historians of the 19th and early 20th centuries have shaped popular perceptions of Native Americans, and explores how researchers have told the history before the 1650s. The materials available to reconstruct the history of the region’s Native Americans are often hard to find, a common issue for researchers who attempt to study the history of indigenous peoples before 1500. Thus, the essay pays special attention to how incomplete primary sources as well as archeological and ethnohistorical evidence have shaped interpretations of this history and how these intellectual processes have aided in the construction of this past.","PeriodicalId":30064,"journal":{"name":"American Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18422/69-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The essay explores the often-ignored histories of the indigenous people who resided on the confluence of the Merrimack and the Concord rivers up to the 1650s. This place is characterized by a significant bend in the Merrimack River as it changes its southerly flow into an easterly direction. Today, the area includes the modern city of Lowell, Massachusetts, and its surroundings. While the 1650s saw the creation of a Native American “praying town” and the incorporation of the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s towns of Chelmsford and Billerica, it is the diverse and complex indigenous past before this decade which North American and global historians tend to neglect. The pre-colonial and early colonial eras, and how observers have described these periods, have shaped the way we understand history today. This essay problematizes terminology, looks at how amateur historians of the 19th and early 20th centuries have shaped popular perceptions of Native Americans, and explores how researchers have told the history before the 1650s. The materials available to reconstruct the history of the region’s Native Americans are often hard to find, a common issue for researchers who attempt to study the history of indigenous peoples before 1500. Thus, the essay pays special attention to how incomplete primary sources as well as archeological and ethnohistorical evidence have shaped interpretations of this history and how these intellectual processes have aided in the construction of this past.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
17世纪50年代以前,在新英格兰河的拐弯处发现土著世界和历史:命名法和定居者殖民历史问题,深层历史和早期殖民叙事
这篇文章探讨了居住在梅里马克河和康科德河汇合处的土著居民的历史,这些历史一直被忽视到17世纪50年代。这个地方的特点是梅里马克河有一个明显的弯道,因为它把南流变成了东流。今天,该地区包括马萨诸塞州的现代城市洛厄尔及其周边地区。虽然17世纪50年代见证了印第安人“祈祷小镇”的建立,以及马萨诸塞湾殖民地切姆斯福德和比勒里卡镇的合并,但北美和全球历史学家往往忽视的是这十年之前印第安人多样化和复杂的过去。前殖民时期和早期殖民时期,以及观察家们对这些时期的描述,塑造了我们今天理解历史的方式。这篇文章对术语提出了质疑,考察了19世纪和20世纪初的业余历史学家如何塑造了人们对美洲原住民的普遍看法,并探讨了研究人员如何讲述1650年代之前的历史。重建该地区印第安人历史的材料往往很难找到,这是试图研究1500年前土著民族历史的研究人员面临的一个共同问题。因此,本文特别关注不完整的原始来源以及考古和民族历史证据如何塑造了对这段历史的解释,以及这些智力过程如何帮助构建这段过去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spending Time in the Nineteenth Century Melville’s Majestic Missive:“Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street” Ishmael’s Night of Rest and Relaxation Data, Maps, Networks – Digital Approaches to Reading (in) Nineteenth-Century Literature Making Love Public: The Paradoxes of Intimacy in Henry James’s The Wings of the Dove
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1