Avaliação da interação entre resina composta e diferentes adesivos dentinários

Luciana Lourenço Ribeiro, F. Sá, E. Franco, M. Navarro
{"title":"Avaliação da interação entre resina composta e diferentes adesivos dentinários","authors":"Luciana Lourenço Ribeiro, F. Sá, E. Franco, M. Navarro","doi":"10.1590/S0103-06631999000100008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tensile bond strength of four different adhesive systems. Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus, 3M (Group 1), Prime & Bond 2.0, Dentsply (Group 2), ProBOND, Dentsply (Group 3), PAAMA 2, SDI (Group 4) were used with GLACIER (SDI) composite resin. One group without any adhesive was used as control (Group 5). Fifty specimens were divided into 5 groups of 10 each. A stainless steel split matrix with 6.00 mm diameter and 1.00 mm depth was used to obtain two discs of composite resin. The composite resin was applied into one half of the matrix in small portions and light cured for 40 seconds. The adhesives were then applied on the composite resin discs surfaces, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The second half of the matrix was assembled and the other half was filled with composite resin. After one hour, the matrix was adapted to a special device mounted in a Kratos testing machine to determine the tensile bond strength, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results, expressed in KgF, were obtained: Group 1 (3.99 ± l.73), Group 2 (4.24 ± 1.91), Group 3 (3.84 ± 1.59), Group 4 (4.33 ± 1.82) and Group 5 (4.16 ± 1.79). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. There were no statistical differences (p < 0.05) in bond strength between groups. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that there was no influence of the different adhesives in the bond strength to a composite resin.","PeriodicalId":77611,"journal":{"name":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"34 1","pages":"31-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-06631999000100008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tensile bond strength of four different adhesive systems. Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus, 3M (Group 1), Prime & Bond 2.0, Dentsply (Group 2), ProBOND, Dentsply (Group 3), PAAMA 2, SDI (Group 4) were used with GLACIER (SDI) composite resin. One group without any adhesive was used as control (Group 5). Fifty specimens were divided into 5 groups of 10 each. A stainless steel split matrix with 6.00 mm diameter and 1.00 mm depth was used to obtain two discs of composite resin. The composite resin was applied into one half of the matrix in small portions and light cured for 40 seconds. The adhesives were then applied on the composite resin discs surfaces, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The second half of the matrix was assembled and the other half was filled with composite resin. After one hour, the matrix was adapted to a special device mounted in a Kratos testing machine to determine the tensile bond strength, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results, expressed in KgF, were obtained: Group 1 (3.99 ± l.73), Group 2 (4.24 ± 1.91), Group 3 (3.84 ± 1.59), Group 4 (4.33 ± 1.82) and Group 5 (4.16 ± 1.79). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. There were no statistical differences (p < 0.05) in bond strength between groups. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that there was no influence of the different adhesives in the bond strength to a composite resin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复合树脂与不同牙本质胶粘剂相互作用的评价
本研究的目的是评估四种不同粘接剂系统的抗拉结合强度。使用Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus、3M(1组)、Prime & Bond 2.0、Dentsply(2组)、ProBOND、Dentsply(3组)、PAAMA 2、SDI(4组)与GLACIER (SDI)复合树脂。50只标本分为5组,每组10只。采用直径为6.00 mm、深度为1.00 mm的不锈钢劈裂基质制备了两片复合树脂片。将复合树脂一小部分涂在一半的基体上,光固化40秒。然后按照制造商的说明将粘合剂应用于复合树脂盘表面。将基质的另一半组装起来,另一半填充复合树脂。1小时后,将基体适配到安装在奎托斯试验机上的特殊装置上,以0.5 mm/min的十字速度测定拉伸粘结强度。KgF表达结果:组1(3.99±1.73)、组2(4.24±1.91)、组3(3.84±1.59)、组4(4.33±1.82)、组5(4.16±1.79)。数据采用单因素方差分析。两组间结合力差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。根据本研究的结果,可以得出结论,不同的粘合剂对复合树脂的结合强度没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Resisting social identity threat and maintaining resilience": A qualitative study of Chinese parents following the loss of an only child. Study of surface alterations of composite and ionomeric materials submitted to simulation of a high cariogenic challenge Infiltração marginal de agentes cimentantes em coroas metálicas fundidas Efeito da desinfeccao por aerossois sobre a capacidade de umedecimento de moldes de polieter por gesso tipo IV Microinfiltração em dentes decíduos em função de materiais restauradores e condicionamento ácido
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1