{"title":"Microinfiltração em dentes decíduos em função de materiais restauradores e condicionamento ácido","authors":"S. K. Bussadori, A. Muench","doi":"10.1590/S0103-06631999000400009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to evaluate microleakage on proximal restorations of primary teeth, using four materials (Dyract, Vitremer, Z100 and Fuji II LC). Acid etching was performed in only one group. Proximal cavities were prepared with the following measures (mm): height, 4; width, 3; depth, 2. Restoring was performed according to manufacturers instructions, and specimens were stored in distilled water for seven days, at 37oC. Afterwards, thermal cycling was performed (700 cycles at 5 and 55oC, for one minute in each temperature). Specimens were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue solution, and prepared for evaluation. The results led to the following conclusions: there were great differences of scores between materials, 0.1 (Dyract) and 4.0 (Fuji II LC); Vitremer and Z100 presented similar values (respectively, in scores, 1.7 and 1.6); Fuji II LC presented the largest microleakage, which decreased with the acid etching.","PeriodicalId":77611,"journal":{"name":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"13 1","pages":"369-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-06631999000400009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to evaluate microleakage on proximal restorations of primary teeth, using four materials (Dyract, Vitremer, Z100 and Fuji II LC). Acid etching was performed in only one group. Proximal cavities were prepared with the following measures (mm): height, 4; width, 3; depth, 2. Restoring was performed according to manufacturers instructions, and specimens were stored in distilled water for seven days, at 37oC. Afterwards, thermal cycling was performed (700 cycles at 5 and 55oC, for one minute in each temperature). Specimens were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue solution, and prepared for evaluation. The results led to the following conclusions: there were great differences of scores between materials, 0.1 (Dyract) and 4.0 (Fuji II LC); Vitremer and Z100 presented similar values (respectively, in scores, 1.7 and 1.6); Fuji II LC presented the largest microleakage, which decreased with the acid etching.
本研究采用四种材料(Dyract、Vitremer、Z100和Fuji II LC)对乳牙近端修复体的微渗漏进行评价。仅一组进行酸蚀。近端空腔采用以下测量(mm):高度,4;宽度,3;深度,2。按照制造商的说明进行修复,标本在37℃的蒸馏水中保存7天。然后进行热循环(在5℃和55℃下循环700次,每种温度各1分钟)。然后将标本浸入0.5%亚甲基蓝溶液中,准备评估。结果表明:材料间的评分差异较大,分别为0.1 (Dyract)和4.0 (Fuji II LC);Vitremer和Z100的得分相近(分别为1.7分和1.6分);富士II型LC微漏最大,随酸蚀而减小。