Addiction Treatment in America: After Money or Aftercare?

David K. Miller, Merlene Miller, K. Blum, R. Badgaiyan, M. Febo
{"title":"Addiction Treatment in America: After Money or Aftercare?","authors":"David K. Miller, Merlene Miller, K. Blum, R. Badgaiyan, M. Febo","doi":"10.17756/JRDS.2015-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are approximately 14,500 clinics and programs in America that provide treatment for all types of addictive behaviors we call \"Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)\". While most of these have good intentions to provide needed help to the victims of RDS, we propose herein that most of their efforts, especially during periods of aftercare, are not based on the existing scientific evidence. We use \"aftercare\" to refer to any form of program or therapy following primary treatment including 12-Step programs. Very few programs actually provide any evidenced-based treatment approaches during this most vulnerable period in recovery. In this trieste we are suggesting that a hypodopaminergic trait (genetic) and/or state (epigenetic) is critical in terms of continued motivation to use/abuse of alcohol or other drugs and can lead to relapse. While there is evidence for the approved FDA drugs to treat drug addiction (e.g. alcohol, opiates, nicotine) these drugs favor a short-term benefit by blocking dopamine. We argue instead for the utilization of long-term benefits that induce \"dopamine homeostasis\", or in simpler terms \"normalcy\". We suggest that this could be accomplished through a number of holistic modalities including, but not limited to, dopamine-boosting diets, hyper-oxygenation, heavy metal detoxification, exercise, meditation, yoga, and most importantly, brain neurotransmitter balancing with nutraceuticals such as KB220 variants. We embrace 12-step programs and fellowships but not as a stand-alone modality, especially during aftercare. We also provide some scientific basis for why resting state functional connectivity (rsfMRI) is so important and may be the cornerstone in terms of how to treat RDS. We postulate that since drugs, food, smoking, gambling, and even compulsive sexual behavior could reduce rsfMRI then modalities (following required research), that can restore this impaired cross talk between various brain regions (e.g. Nucleus accumbens, cingulate gyrus, hippocampus etc.) should be incorporated into the aftercare plan in all treatment programs in America. Anything less will ultimately lead to the so called \"revolving door\" for as many as 90% of treatment participants.","PeriodicalId":90909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reward deficiency syndrome","volume":"1 3 1","pages":"87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reward deficiency syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/JRDS.2015-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

There are approximately 14,500 clinics and programs in America that provide treatment for all types of addictive behaviors we call "Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)". While most of these have good intentions to provide needed help to the victims of RDS, we propose herein that most of their efforts, especially during periods of aftercare, are not based on the existing scientific evidence. We use "aftercare" to refer to any form of program or therapy following primary treatment including 12-Step programs. Very few programs actually provide any evidenced-based treatment approaches during this most vulnerable period in recovery. In this trieste we are suggesting that a hypodopaminergic trait (genetic) and/or state (epigenetic) is critical in terms of continued motivation to use/abuse of alcohol or other drugs and can lead to relapse. While there is evidence for the approved FDA drugs to treat drug addiction (e.g. alcohol, opiates, nicotine) these drugs favor a short-term benefit by blocking dopamine. We argue instead for the utilization of long-term benefits that induce "dopamine homeostasis", or in simpler terms "normalcy". We suggest that this could be accomplished through a number of holistic modalities including, but not limited to, dopamine-boosting diets, hyper-oxygenation, heavy metal detoxification, exercise, meditation, yoga, and most importantly, brain neurotransmitter balancing with nutraceuticals such as KB220 variants. We embrace 12-step programs and fellowships but not as a stand-alone modality, especially during aftercare. We also provide some scientific basis for why resting state functional connectivity (rsfMRI) is so important and may be the cornerstone in terms of how to treat RDS. We postulate that since drugs, food, smoking, gambling, and even compulsive sexual behavior could reduce rsfMRI then modalities (following required research), that can restore this impaired cross talk between various brain regions (e.g. Nucleus accumbens, cingulate gyrus, hippocampus etc.) should be incorporated into the aftercare plan in all treatment programs in America. Anything less will ultimately lead to the so called "revolving door" for as many as 90% of treatment participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的成瘾治疗:花钱还是事后护理?
在美国,大约有14500家诊所和项目为所有类型的成瘾行为提供治疗,我们称之为“奖励缺乏综合症”(RDS)。虽然他们中的大多数人都有良好的意图,为RDS的受害者提供所需的帮助,但我们在此提出,他们的大部分努力,特别是在善后期间,并没有基于现有的科学证据。我们使用“后续护理”指的是初级治疗后的任何形式的计划或治疗,包括12步计划。在这个最脆弱的康复期,很少有项目真正提供任何基于证据的治疗方法。在这篇文章中,我们建议低多巴胺能特征(遗传)和/或状态(表观遗传)在持续使用/滥用酒精或其他药物的动机方面是至关重要的,并可能导致复发。虽然有证据表明FDA批准的药物可以治疗药物成瘾(如酒精、鸦片、尼古丁),但这些药物通过阻断多巴胺而获得短期效果。相反,我们主张利用长期利益诱导“多巴胺稳态”,或者更简单地说“正常”。我们建议这可以通过一些整体模式来实现,包括但不限于,多巴胺促进饮食,高氧,重金属排毒,运动,冥想,瑜伽,最重要的是,通过营养保健品(如KB220变体)平衡脑神经递质。我们接受12步计划和奖学金,但不是作为一个独立的模式,特别是在善后护理期间。我们还为静息状态功能连接(rsfMRI)为何如此重要提供了一些科学依据,并可能成为如何治疗RDS的基石。我们假设,既然药物、食物、吸烟、赌博,甚至强迫性的性行为都可以降低rsfMRI,那么可以恢复大脑各区域(如伏隔核、扣带回、海马体等)之间受损的串扰的方式(根据需要的研究)应该被纳入美国所有治疗方案的术后护理计划。如果做不到这一点,最终将导致多达90%的治疗参与者进入所谓的“旋转门”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain Reward Pathway Dysfunction in Maternal Depression and Addiction: A Present and Future Transgenerational Risk Addiction Treatment in America: After Money or Aftercare? Designer Drugs: A Synthetic Catastrophe NIDA-Drug Addiction Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) Relapse as a Function of Spirituality/Religiosity. Molecular Genetic Testing in Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS): Facts and Fiction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1