Tui tui tuituia - Weaving together: What can be generalized from these articles?

C. Branson, Michele Morrison, Rachel McNae
{"title":"Tui tui tuituia - Weaving together: What can be generalized from these articles?","authors":"C. Branson, Michele Morrison, Rachel McNae","doi":"10.21307/jelpp-2015-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As has been often acknowledged amid the articles presented in this JELPP special issue, the impetus for its focus on leadership for social justice arose out of the editors' involvement in the international research project exploring the same phenomenon. One of the key questions guiding this particular international research project is: How can an international and comparative research enhance our understanding of what social justice leadership means in different national contexts? To date, this research project has attracted the involvement of some 36 universities across 25 different countries. Indeed, there are research sites in each and every continent. It seems that the issue of social justice, and how it can be proclaimed and established through suitable leadership, has become a global concern. Arguably, there is growing scepticism about the panacean social benefits of neo-liberal economic policies. Despite the economic influence of such policies for more than 20 years, people are not witnessing the heralded social benefits of a free market. Quite the contrary, it seems that the rich are getting richer and more people are becoming disadvantaged (OECD, 2011). Now it seems that rather than leaving socially just outcomes to the insentient vagaries of national economic policies, a significant number of people around the world are striving to reclaim this perceived essential human responsibility. Thus, a laudable aim of this international research project is, first, to understand what constitutes leadership for social justice and then, provided there are discernible universal norms and principles, propose ways in which such leadership can be nurtured and enhanced. Surely any means for broadening and hastening the spread of leadership for social justice is a worthwhile achievement.","PeriodicalId":33385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Leadership Policy and Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":"107 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Leadership Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2015-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As has been often acknowledged amid the articles presented in this JELPP special issue, the impetus for its focus on leadership for social justice arose out of the editors' involvement in the international research project exploring the same phenomenon. One of the key questions guiding this particular international research project is: How can an international and comparative research enhance our understanding of what social justice leadership means in different national contexts? To date, this research project has attracted the involvement of some 36 universities across 25 different countries. Indeed, there are research sites in each and every continent. It seems that the issue of social justice, and how it can be proclaimed and established through suitable leadership, has become a global concern. Arguably, there is growing scepticism about the panacean social benefits of neo-liberal economic policies. Despite the economic influence of such policies for more than 20 years, people are not witnessing the heralded social benefits of a free market. Quite the contrary, it seems that the rich are getting richer and more people are becoming disadvantaged (OECD, 2011). Now it seems that rather than leaving socially just outcomes to the insentient vagaries of national economic policies, a significant number of people around the world are striving to reclaim this perceived essential human responsibility. Thus, a laudable aim of this international research project is, first, to understand what constitutes leadership for social justice and then, provided there are discernible universal norms and principles, propose ways in which such leadership can be nurtured and enhanced. Surely any means for broadening and hastening the spread of leadership for social justice is a worthwhile achievement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tui Tui tutuia -编织在一起:从这些文章中可以概括出什么?
正如在本期JELPP特刊中所呈现的文章中经常承认的那样,其关注社会正义领导力的动力来自于编辑参与探索同一现象的国际研究项目。指导这个特殊的国际研究项目的关键问题之一是:国际和比较研究如何加强我们对社会正义领导在不同国家背景下意味着什么的理解?迄今为止,这个研究项目已经吸引了来自25个不同国家的36所大学的参与。事实上,每个大洲都有研究地点。看来,社会正义的问题,以及如何通过适当的领导来宣布和建立社会正义,已经成为一个全球性的问题。可以说,人们越来越怀疑新自由主义经济政策的万灵药社会效益。尽管这些政策对经济产生了20多年的影响,但人们并没有看到自由市场所预示的社会效益。恰恰相反,似乎富人越来越富有,而越来越多的人处于不利地位(经合组织,2011)。现在看来,世界上有相当多的人正在努力收回这种被认为是人类的基本责任,而不是将社会公正的结果留给国家经济政策的无情变幻莫测。因此,这个国际研究项目的一个值得称赞的目标是,首先了解什么是社会正义的领导能力,然后,如果有明显的普遍规范和原则,提出培养和加强这种领导能力的方法。当然,任何扩大和加速社会正义领导权传播的手段都是值得取得的成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Storying family experiences in higher education: Surfacing, awakening, and transforming developing leader identity Culturally responsive policy development: Co-constructing assessment and reporting practices with First Nation educators in Alberta Cowboy epistemology: Rural school and district leadership for diversity and social justice Breaking through the glass ceiling: Experiences of academic women who have advanced to leadership roles in tertiary education in New Zealand Changing and challenging dimensions of principal autonomy in South Australia: A lived experience phenomenological analysis of the courage to care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1