Effects of soil and water conservation investment on household income in the Volcanoes National Park of Rwanda

Ildephonse  Musafili, O. Ingasia, E. Birachi
{"title":"Effects of soil and water conservation investment on household income in the Volcanoes National Park of Rwanda","authors":"Ildephonse  Musafili, O. Ingasia, E. Birachi","doi":"10.17306/j.jard.2021.01427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil and water conservation (SWC) technologies contribute to sustainable agriculture and rural poverty reduction. Yet, the relationship between farm household income and SWC investment is not well-understood in Rwanda. This study aims to assess the effects of investing in SWC on household income and improve the knowledge of how various classes of smallholders can benefit from such an investment at a farm level. The study used survey data from 422 farming households in northern Rwanda’s Burera, Gakenke and Musanze districts. Descriptive analysis was employed to determine levels of use of SWC and SF measures. Quantile estimation classified three classes of farming households: the poor, middle-income earners and the rich. Instrumental variable quantile regression was adopted to assess heterogeneous effects of financing SWC investment. The results revealed that the extent of using SWC and SF measures is generally low. Agriculture income and off-farm (casual) wages had the largest income shares among the poor and middle-income earners. Financing investment in SWC increases income significantly for middle-income earners, i.e. five times more than the poor, but it was ineffective for the wealthy. Socio-economic factors and commercial crops had a significant effect on income across the classes. Institutional factors demonstrated no significant impact on the poor and middle-income earners. The findings suggest that incorporating pro-poor interventions in SWC investment would increase the productivity and commercialisation of cash and staple crops. These results inform a need to promote linkages between SWC investment and income diversification strategies to increase asset-building for the poor and close income gaps among the three farming classes. This finding suggests the need to introduce saving and lending innovations in SWC that link farm activities to nonfarm opportunities. ","PeriodicalId":30385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2021.01427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil and water conservation (SWC) technologies contribute to sustainable agriculture and rural poverty reduction. Yet, the relationship between farm household income and SWC investment is not well-understood in Rwanda. This study aims to assess the effects of investing in SWC on household income and improve the knowledge of how various classes of smallholders can benefit from such an investment at a farm level. The study used survey data from 422 farming households in northern Rwanda’s Burera, Gakenke and Musanze districts. Descriptive analysis was employed to determine levels of use of SWC and SF measures. Quantile estimation classified three classes of farming households: the poor, middle-income earners and the rich. Instrumental variable quantile regression was adopted to assess heterogeneous effects of financing SWC investment. The results revealed that the extent of using SWC and SF measures is generally low. Agriculture income and off-farm (casual) wages had the largest income shares among the poor and middle-income earners. Financing investment in SWC increases income significantly for middle-income earners, i.e. five times more than the poor, but it was ineffective for the wealthy. Socio-economic factors and commercial crops had a significant effect on income across the classes. Institutional factors demonstrated no significant impact on the poor and middle-income earners. The findings suggest that incorporating pro-poor interventions in SWC investment would increase the productivity and commercialisation of cash and staple crops. These results inform a need to promote linkages between SWC investment and income diversification strategies to increase asset-building for the poor and close income gaps among the three farming classes. This finding suggests the need to introduce saving and lending innovations in SWC that link farm activities to nonfarm opportunities. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卢旺达火山国家公园水土保持投资对家庭收入的影响
水土保持技术有助于可持续农业和农村减贫。然而,在卢旺达,农民家庭收入与SWC投资之间的关系并不是很清楚。本研究旨在评估对SWC投资对家庭收入的影响,并提高对不同阶层小农如何从农场一级的此类投资中受益的认识。这项研究使用了来自卢旺达北部Burera、Gakenke和Musanze地区422个农户的调查数据。采用描述性分析来确定SWC和SF测量的使用水平。分位数估计将农户分为三类:穷人、中等收入者和富人。本文采用工具变量分位数回归方法评估了融资SWC投资的异质性效应。结果表明,采用SWC和SF措施的程度普遍较低。农业收入和非农(临时)工资在穷人和中等收入者的收入中所占比例最大。对SWC的融资投资显著增加了中等收入者的收入,即比穷人多五倍,但对富人无效。社会经济因素和经济作物对各阶层的收入有显著影响。体制因素对穷人和中等收入者没有显著影响。研究结果表明,将有利于穷人的干预措施纳入SWC投资将提高经济作物和主要作物的生产力和商业化。这些结果表明,有必要促进SWC投资与收入多样化战略之间的联系,以增加穷人的资产建设,缩小三个农业阶层之间的收入差距。这一发现表明,有必要在SWC中引入储蓄和贷款创新,将农业活动与非农业机会联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
DETERMINANTS OF FARMERS’ DECISION TO CHOICE MARKET OUTLETS: EVIDENCE FROM MILK PRODUCER FARMERS IN ADA’A BERGA DISTRICT ETHIOPIA PEARL MILLET, THE HOPE OF FOOD SECURITY IN MARGINAL ARID TROPICS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DIVERSIFYING LIMITED CROPPING SYSTEMS Shaping intention to pay attention to health claims ANALYSING CONTRIBUTION AND DETERMINANTS OF INDIGENOUS LEAFY VEGETABLES (ILVS) TO HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IN THE EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA STRENGTHENING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE LENTIL SEED SYSTEM OF NEPAL: A VALUE CHAIN APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1