Institutional Determinants of Higher Education Students' International Mobility within the Erasmus Programme Countries

Z. Bartha, A. Gubik
{"title":"Institutional Determinants of Higher Education Students' International Mobility within the Erasmus Programme Countries","authors":"Z. Bartha, A. Gubik","doi":"10.18096/TMP.2018.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the major EU policy objectives is to enhance the international mobility of students. The Leuven Communique published in 2009 set an objective of increasing the ratio of European Higher Education Area (EHEA) higher education graduates participating in a study or a training period abroad to at least 20% by 2020. However, currently the majority of European Union Member States perform significantly below the target in this respect. Also, since a low number of students are interested in mobility programmes, the funds of the Erasmus-type student mobility programs remain unused. This study focuses on highlighting the factors that represent barriers to student participation in mobility programs. After conducting a literature review on international student mobility and presenting major statistics describing outbound mobility, this study investigates factors related to institutional components of the higher education system that affect the international mobility of Erasmus young people. Among the explanatory factors related to Erasmus-type student mobility, cultural factors including Hofstede’s indulgence and uncertainty avoidance seem to have the greatest influence on student mobility intentions in Europe. The findings revealed that better planned Erasmus processes (pre-, during and postmobility activities such as departure, course choice, staying in a host country, etc.) and better communicated career opportunities and labour market values of the mobility could considerably contribute to an increase in the number of outbound students. One of the main lessons learned from the conducted analyses is that Europe’s rich cultural diversity needs to be considered in the course of promoting the Erasmus Programme in Europe. In addition to adopting common communication, promotion and direction strategies, programmes need to be elaborated that take national specificities into account.","PeriodicalId":31458,"journal":{"name":"Theory Methodology Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Methodology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18096/TMP.2018.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the major EU policy objectives is to enhance the international mobility of students. The Leuven Communique published in 2009 set an objective of increasing the ratio of European Higher Education Area (EHEA) higher education graduates participating in a study or a training period abroad to at least 20% by 2020. However, currently the majority of European Union Member States perform significantly below the target in this respect. Also, since a low number of students are interested in mobility programmes, the funds of the Erasmus-type student mobility programs remain unused. This study focuses on highlighting the factors that represent barriers to student participation in mobility programs. After conducting a literature review on international student mobility and presenting major statistics describing outbound mobility, this study investigates factors related to institutional components of the higher education system that affect the international mobility of Erasmus young people. Among the explanatory factors related to Erasmus-type student mobility, cultural factors including Hofstede’s indulgence and uncertainty avoidance seem to have the greatest influence on student mobility intentions in Europe. The findings revealed that better planned Erasmus processes (pre-, during and postmobility activities such as departure, course choice, staying in a host country, etc.) and better communicated career opportunities and labour market values of the mobility could considerably contribute to an increase in the number of outbound students. One of the main lessons learned from the conducted analyses is that Europe’s rich cultural diversity needs to be considered in the course of promoting the Erasmus Programme in Europe. In addition to adopting common communication, promotion and direction strategies, programmes need to be elaborated that take national specificities into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育学生在伊拉斯谟计划国家国际流动的制度决定因素
欧盟的主要政策目标之一是提高学生的国际流动性。2009年发布的《鲁汶公报》设定了到2020年将欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)高等教育毕业生参加海外学习或培训的比例提高到至少20%的目标。然而,目前大多数欧洲联盟成员国在这方面的表现远远低于目标。此外,由于很少有学生对流动计划感兴趣,erasmus类型的学生流动计划的资金仍未使用。本研究着重强调了阻碍学生参与流动项目的因素。在对国际学生流动进行文献回顾并提供描述出境流动的主要统计数据后,本研究调查了影响伊拉斯谟年轻人国际流动的高等教育系统制度组成部分相关因素。在与erasmus型学生流动相关的解释因素中,包括Hofstede’s indulgence和uncertainty avoidance在内的文化因素似乎对欧洲学生流动意愿的影响最大。研究结果显示,更好地规划伊拉斯谟过程(流动前、流动中和流动后的活动,如离境、课程选择、留在东道国等)以及更好地沟通流动的职业机会和劳动力市场价值,可以大大促进出国学生人数的增加。从所进行的分析中吸取的主要教训之一是,在欧洲促进伊拉斯谟方案的过程中需要考虑到欧洲丰富的文化多样性。除了采取共同的宣传、促进和指导战略外,还需要拟订考虑到各国具体情况的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Bank Services Excellence in Iraq: A Comprehensive Investigation Employing the SERVQUAL Model Transformational Leadership Impact on Employee's Motivation: A Comparative Study of National and Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies in Pakistan Digital Solutions and Machine Learning Can Improve Niche Market Reach Technology and Strategy: Towards Strategic Techno-Management Logistic Regression or Neural Network? Which Provides Better Results for Retail Loans?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1