Significance of coping strategies on the outcome of surgical treatment of patients with prosoplegia

D. Gulyaev, T. A. Kaurova, I. Kurnosov, K. Chizhova, I. Yakovenko
{"title":"Significance of coping strategies on the outcome of surgical treatment of patients with prosoplegia","authors":"D. Gulyaev, T. A. Kaurova, I. Kurnosov, K. Chizhova, I. Yakovenko","doi":"10.18137/cardiometry.2023.27.164170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to evaluate the impact of coping strategies on the outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with prosoplegia. Material and methods: the analysis of the results of surgical treatment of 50 patients with prosoplegia that developed after removal of tumors of the posterior part of the skull, the lateral part of the skull base, and the parotid-masticatory region involved in reconstructive interventions on the facial nerve was performed. At the preoperative stage a clinical examination of patients was performed according to the House-Brackmann scale, Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) scale, and a neurophysiological study was performed. A survey was carried out with the use of the Heim’s questionnaire, WCQ (version by Lazarus), CSI as an indicator of coping strategies before surgery and the Aaron Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC). Outcomes were evaluated according to the Johnny Chuieng–Yi Lu subjective scale “Satisfaction with surgical treatment”. Results: all patients from 6 to 10 months after surgery showed signs of muscle recovery, which in the majority (88%, n=44) was accompanied by an improvement in their condition. In 12% of cases (n=6) there were no positive dynamics, which caused unsatisfactory results of treatment. Such painful conditions are often interrupted or recommendations for self-rehabilitation are not followed. The above-described predominance of maladaptive coping strategies in patients with unsatisfactory initial operations is reliable. Adaptive treatment strategies were better developed in patients with favorable treatment outcomes. A high direct correlation was established between the outcomes of treatment, assessed by the Johnny Chuieng–Yi Lu scales, SGFS and SOC coherence scale, Conclusion: Systemic complex rehabilitation and self-rehabilitation have a significant impact on treatment outcomes. Prosoplegia leads to a violation of facial and emotional expression, causing social maladjustment and depressive disorders, minimizing the effects of reinnervation in combination with negative coping strategies. As a result, full-fledged surgical treatment of the facial muscles is currently a very difficult and sometimes insurmountable task.","PeriodicalId":41726,"journal":{"name":"Cardiometry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18137/cardiometry.2023.27.164170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to evaluate the impact of coping strategies on the outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with prosoplegia. Material and methods: the analysis of the results of surgical treatment of 50 patients with prosoplegia that developed after removal of tumors of the posterior part of the skull, the lateral part of the skull base, and the parotid-masticatory region involved in reconstructive interventions on the facial nerve was performed. At the preoperative stage a clinical examination of patients was performed according to the House-Brackmann scale, Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) scale, and a neurophysiological study was performed. A survey was carried out with the use of the Heim’s questionnaire, WCQ (version by Lazarus), CSI as an indicator of coping strategies before surgery and the Aaron Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC). Outcomes were evaluated according to the Johnny Chuieng–Yi Lu subjective scale “Satisfaction with surgical treatment”. Results: all patients from 6 to 10 months after surgery showed signs of muscle recovery, which in the majority (88%, n=44) was accompanied by an improvement in their condition. In 12% of cases (n=6) there were no positive dynamics, which caused unsatisfactory results of treatment. Such painful conditions are often interrupted or recommendations for self-rehabilitation are not followed. The above-described predominance of maladaptive coping strategies in patients with unsatisfactory initial operations is reliable. Adaptive treatment strategies were better developed in patients with favorable treatment outcomes. A high direct correlation was established between the outcomes of treatment, assessed by the Johnny Chuieng–Yi Lu scales, SGFS and SOC coherence scale, Conclusion: Systemic complex rehabilitation and self-rehabilitation have a significant impact on treatment outcomes. Prosoplegia leads to a violation of facial and emotional expression, causing social maladjustment and depressive disorders, minimizing the effects of reinnervation in combination with negative coping strategies. As a result, full-fledged surgical treatment of the facial muscles is currently a very difficult and sometimes insurmountable task.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对策略对肢体瘫痪患者手术治疗效果的影响
目的:探讨应对策略对肢体瘫痪患者手术治疗效果的影响。材料与方法:对50例颅后、颅底外侧、腮腺咀嚼区肿瘤切除后发生的面神经再造术患者的手术治疗结果进行分析。术前根据House-Brackmann量表、Sunnybrook面部评分系统(SFGS)量表对患者进行临床检查,并进行神经生理学研究。使用海姆问卷、WCQ (Lazarus版本)、CSI(手术前应对策略指标)和Aaron Antonovsky的连贯性感量表(SOC)进行调查。采用Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu主观评定量表“手术治疗满意度”进行评价。结果:术后6 - 10个月,所有患者均有肌肉恢复的迹象,其中大多数(88%,n=44)患者的病情均有改善。在12%的病例(n=6)中,没有积极的动力,导致治疗结果不理想。这种痛苦的状况经常被打断,或者自我康复的建议没有被遵循。上述在初次手术不满意的患者中出现适应不良应对策略的优势是可靠的。在治疗效果良好的患者中,适应性治疗策略发展得更好。Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu量表、SGFS量表和SOC一致性量表对治疗结果的评价存在高度的直接相关性。结论:系统性复杂康复和自我康复对治疗结果有显著影响。肢体瘫痪导致面部和情感表达的侵犯,导致社交失调和抑郁障碍,将神经移植与消极应对策略相结合的效果最小化。因此,面部肌肉的全面手术治疗目前是一项非常困难的任务,有时甚至是无法克服的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiometry
Cardiometry MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiometry is an open access biannual electronic journal founded in 2012. It refers to medicine, particularly to cardiology, as well as oncocardiology and allied science of biophysics and medical equipment engineering. We publish mainly high quality original articles, reports, case reports, reviews and lectures in the field of the theory of cardiovascular system functioning, principles of cardiometry, its diagnostic methods, cardiovascular system therapy from the aspect of cardiometry, system and particular approaches to maintaining health, engineering peculiarities in cardiometry developing. The interdisciplinary areas of the journal are: hemodynamics, biophysics, biochemistry, metrology. The target audience of our Journal covers healthcare providers including cardiologists and general practitioners, bioengineers, biophysics, medical equipment, especially cardiology diagnostics device, developers, educators, nurses, healthcare decision-makers, people with cardiovascular diseases, cardiology and engineering universities and schools, state and private clinics. Cardiometry is aimed to provide a wide forum for exchange of information and public discussion on above scientific issues for the mentioned experts.
期刊最新文献
Application of bioinspired methods and means in medicine Molecular and epidemiological study of pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients in Baghdad city-Iraq Chronic gastritis in pediatrics THREE-DIMENSIONAL IN VITRO MODELS FOR STUDYING THE CHEMOSENSITIVITY OF BREAST CANCER CELLS MOLECULAR GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OVARIAN CANCER IN CRIMEAN PATIENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1