The Validity and Reliability of the Physical Activity Questionnaires (PAQ-A) among Indonesian Adolescents during Online and Blended Learning Schooling

Q2 Social Sciences Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Pub Date : 2022-06-25 DOI:10.17309/tmfv.2022.2.04
Atikah Rahayu, Sumaryanti Sumaryanti, N. Arovah
{"title":"The Validity and Reliability of the Physical Activity Questionnaires (PAQ-A) among Indonesian Adolescents during Online and Blended Learning Schooling","authors":"Atikah Rahayu, Sumaryanti Sumaryanti, N. Arovah","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2022.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research objectives. This study aimed to validate the use of the Physical Activity Questionnaire Adolescent (PAQ-A), a physical activity instrument widely used in a school setting, among Indonesian adolescents, particularly during blended learning or online schooling due to COVID-19 restrictions.   \nMaterials and methods. This study was a cross-sectional survey of 370 Indonesian adolescents (62.2% female, mean 15±2 years) participating in online and blended learning. Participants completed the Indonesian version of the PAQ-A online. Sixty-three (17%) participants completed the same questionnaire one week later (second survey) for the test-retest reliability, from which the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Internal consistency reliability was calculated in both surveys, while confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was analyzed from the data in the first survey. \nResults. The Cronbach alpha of the PAQ-A for the first and second surveys was 0.78 and 0.82, thus indicating the acceptability of internal consistency reliability. The ICC for all PAQ-A items ranged from 0.40 to 0.81, indicating fair to excellent test and retest reliability. The root means square error of approximation was 0.033 suggesting acceptable construct validity of the instrument. \nConclusions. In conclusion, sufficient evidence shows the validity and reliability of the PAQ-A to justify the use of the questionnaires for measuring physical activity levels in the Indonesian adolescents in the blended learning or online schooling setting.","PeriodicalId":36640,"journal":{"name":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2022.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Research objectives. This study aimed to validate the use of the Physical Activity Questionnaire Adolescent (PAQ-A), a physical activity instrument widely used in a school setting, among Indonesian adolescents, particularly during blended learning or online schooling due to COVID-19 restrictions.   Materials and methods. This study was a cross-sectional survey of 370 Indonesian adolescents (62.2% female, mean 15±2 years) participating in online and blended learning. Participants completed the Indonesian version of the PAQ-A online. Sixty-three (17%) participants completed the same questionnaire one week later (second survey) for the test-retest reliability, from which the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Internal consistency reliability was calculated in both surveys, while confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was analyzed from the data in the first survey. Results. The Cronbach alpha of the PAQ-A for the first and second surveys was 0.78 and 0.82, thus indicating the acceptability of internal consistency reliability. The ICC for all PAQ-A items ranged from 0.40 to 0.81, indicating fair to excellent test and retest reliability. The root means square error of approximation was 0.033 suggesting acceptable construct validity of the instrument. Conclusions. In conclusion, sufficient evidence shows the validity and reliability of the PAQ-A to justify the use of the questionnaires for measuring physical activity levels in the Indonesian adolescents in the blended learning or online schooling setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼青少年在线与混合学习期间体育活动问卷(PAQ-A)的效度与信度
研究的目标。本研究旨在验证青少年身体活动问卷(PAQ-A)的使用,这是一种在学校环境中广泛使用的身体活动工具,在印度尼西亚青少年中,特别是在混合学习或在线学习期间,由于COVID-19的限制。材料和方法。本研究是对参与在线和混合学习的370名印度尼西亚青少年(62.2%为女性,平均15±2岁)的横断面调查。参与者在线完成印尼语版PAQ-A。63名(17%)参与者在一周后完成了相同的问卷(第二次调查),用于测试重测信度,由此计算班级内相关系数(ICC)。两次调查均计算内部一致性信度,并根据第一次调查的数据进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。结果。第一次和第二次调查PAQ-A的Cronbach alpha分别为0.78和0.82,表明内部一致性信度的可接受性。所有PAQ-A项目的ICC范围为0.40至0.81,表明测试和重测的信度从一般到优异。近似均方根误差为0.033,表明该工具具有可接受的结构效度。结论。总之,充分的证据表明PAQ-A的有效性和可靠性,证明使用问卷来测量混合学习或在线教育环境下印度尼西亚青少年的体育活动水平是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Fitball Exercise on Body Composition, Flexibility, Muscular Strength-Endurance and Aerobic Capacity in Obese Working-Age Women Effect of Periodized Interval Training in Combination with Explosive Strength and Speed in Game-Like Situation on Agility and High Intensity Aerobic Capacity of Youth Soccer Players The Effects of School-Based Handball Intervention on 12–14-Year-Old Children’s Physical Fitness and Performance Relation between Start Reaction Time and Performance Time among Women Finalist Sprinters in the Olympic Games 2000 to 2020 Control and Evaluation of the Strength Abilities of Primary School-Aged Karate Boys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1