The Effect of N Fertilizer Source on Grain Yield, N Uptake, Soil pH, and Lime Requirement in No-Till Corn1

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agronomy Journal Pub Date : 1981-09-01 DOI:10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050032x
R. H. Fox, L. D. Hoffman
{"title":"The Effect of N Fertilizer Source on Grain Yield, N Uptake, Soil pH, and Lime Requirement in No-Till Corn1","authors":"R. H. Fox,&nbsp;L. D. Hoffman","doi":"10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050032x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing use of no-till crop production with urea based N fertilizers in the Northeast makes it imperative that we obtain a more quantitative understanding of both the magnitude of apparent NH<sub>3</sub> losses from nonincorporated urea fertilizers in the field and of the factors that contribute to those losses. A 4-year field study was conducted on a Murrill silt loam (Typic Hapludult) to compare the yields and N uptake by no-till corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) receiving five rates of broadcast, unincorporated N (0 to 202 kg/ha) as NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>, urea, urea-NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> solution (UAN), or (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The effects of these sources on the soil pH of the 0 to 2.5 cm and 0 to 17 cm layers and on the lime requirement (LR) in the 0 to 17 cm layer were also measured. In 2 of the 4 years, either urea, UAN, or both produced signifcantly lower yields and N uptake than the non-urea sources at the higher (101 and 202 kg/ha) N rates. Apparent N volatilization losses ranged from 0 to 35%. Comparing the results from this experiment with those from other field experiments reported in the literature where the effect of rainfall after N application on apparent N volatilization losses could be measured showed that the following observations applied to all: (1) there was insignificant NH<sub>3</sub>, volatilization loss from unincorporated urea fertilizers if at least 10 mm of rain fell within 48 hours after fertilizer application; (2) if 10 mm or more rain fell 3 days after the urea was applied, volatilization losses were slight (&lt;10%); (3) if 3 to 5 mm of rain fell within 5 days, or 7 to 9 mm within 9 days, volatilization losses could be moderate (10 to 30%); and (4) if no rain fell within 6 days, the loss could be substantial (&gt;30%).</p><p>The pH in the surface 2.5 cm of soil in the plots receiving 202 kg/ha/year of N as NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> urea, or UAN for 5 years was approximately 5.7 or one unit below that in the check. In the plots receiving this rate of (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, the soil pH in the 0 to 2.5 cm layer was 4.7. As expected, the 101 kg N/ha/year rate produced half was much lowering of pH as the 202 kg/ha rate.</p><p>Lime requirement measurements in the surface 17 cm of soil receiving 202 kg N/ha/year for 5 years indicated that approximately 67% of the acidity theoretically produced in the nitrification of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> remained to be neutralized with the less acidifying sources (NH<sub>4</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, urea, and UAN) and that approximately 100% of that from (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> required neutralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"73 5","pages":"891-895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050032x","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050032x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

The increasing use of no-till crop production with urea based N fertilizers in the Northeast makes it imperative that we obtain a more quantitative understanding of both the magnitude of apparent NH3 losses from nonincorporated urea fertilizers in the field and of the factors that contribute to those losses. A 4-year field study was conducted on a Murrill silt loam (Typic Hapludult) to compare the yields and N uptake by no-till corn (Zea mays L.) receiving five rates of broadcast, unincorporated N (0 to 202 kg/ha) as NH4NO3, urea, urea-NH4NO3 solution (UAN), or (NH4)2SO4. The effects of these sources on the soil pH of the 0 to 2.5 cm and 0 to 17 cm layers and on the lime requirement (LR) in the 0 to 17 cm layer were also measured. In 2 of the 4 years, either urea, UAN, or both produced signifcantly lower yields and N uptake than the non-urea sources at the higher (101 and 202 kg/ha) N rates. Apparent N volatilization losses ranged from 0 to 35%. Comparing the results from this experiment with those from other field experiments reported in the literature where the effect of rainfall after N application on apparent N volatilization losses could be measured showed that the following observations applied to all: (1) there was insignificant NH3, volatilization loss from unincorporated urea fertilizers if at least 10 mm of rain fell within 48 hours after fertilizer application; (2) if 10 mm or more rain fell 3 days after the urea was applied, volatilization losses were slight (<10%); (3) if 3 to 5 mm of rain fell within 5 days, or 7 to 9 mm within 9 days, volatilization losses could be moderate (10 to 30%); and (4) if no rain fell within 6 days, the loss could be substantial (>30%).

The pH in the surface 2.5 cm of soil in the plots receiving 202 kg/ha/year of N as NH4NO3 urea, or UAN for 5 years was approximately 5.7 or one unit below that in the check. In the plots receiving this rate of (NH4)2SO4, the soil pH in the 0 to 2.5 cm layer was 4.7. As expected, the 101 kg N/ha/year rate produced half was much lowering of pH as the 202 kg/ha rate.

Lime requirement measurements in the surface 17 cm of soil receiving 202 kg N/ha/year for 5 years indicated that approximately 67% of the acidity theoretically produced in the nitrification of NH4+ remained to be neutralized with the less acidifying sources (NH4O3, urea, and UAN) and that approximately 100% of that from (NH4)2SO4 required neutralization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氮肥来源对免耕玉米产量、氮素吸收、土壤pH和石灰需要量的影响
在东北地区,免耕作物生产中尿素基氮肥的使用越来越多,这使得我们有必要更定量地了解田地中非氮肥的表观NH3损失幅度以及导致这些损失的因素。在Murrill淤泥壤土(典型Hapludult)上进行了为期4年的田间研究,比较了免耕玉米(Zea mays L.)在5种施氮量(0 ~ 202 kg/ hm2)下的产量和氮素吸收量,分别为NH4NO3、尿素、尿素-NH4NO3溶液(UAN)和(NH4)2SO4。测定了不同来源对0 ~ 2.5 cm和0 ~ 17 cm土层pH值及0 ~ 17 cm土层石灰需要量的影响。在4年中有2年,在较高施氮量(101和202 kg/ hm2)下,尿素、UAN或两者的产量和氮吸收量显著低于非尿素源。氮的表观挥发损失在0 ~ 35%之间。将本试验结果与文献报道的其他施氮后降雨对氮表观挥发损失影响的田间试验结果进行比较,结果表明:(1)施氮后48小时内降雨量至少为10 mm的未配施尿素肥料的NH3挥发损失不显著;(2)施用尿素3天后,若降雨量大于等于10mm,则挥发损失较小(约10%);(3)如果5天内降雨量为3 ~ 5mm,或9天内降雨量为7 ~ 9mm,则挥发损失为中等(10 ~ 30%);(4)如果6天内不下雨,损失可能很大(30%)。施用202 kg/ha/年铵态氮(NH4NO3尿素)和5年铵态氮(UAN)的样地2.5 cm表层土壤pH值比对照值低约5.7或1个单位。在施铵量相同的样地,0 ~ 2.5 cm土层pH值为4.7。正如预期的那样,101 kg N/ha/年的施氮量比202 kg/ha的施氮量要低一半。在接受202 kg N/ha/年5年的土壤表面17厘米处的石灰需求量测量表明,理论上在NH4+硝化过程中产生的大约67%的酸度仍然需要用酸化程度较低的源(NH4O3、尿素和UAN)来中和,而来自(NH4)2SO4的大约100%需要中和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Integrated effects of tillage, fertilizer sources and a rye cover crop on dryland cotton production Long-term evaluation of organic management of durum wheat in Central Italy Weed emergence patterns as affected by topsoil movement within an eroded landform Effects of wheat and faba bean intercropping on yield, land-use efficiency and economic revenue in semi-arid areas Soil test phosphorus predicts field-level but not subfield-level corn yield response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1