{"title":"The Effect of N Fertilizer Source on Grain Yield, N Uptake, Soil pH, and Lime Requirement in No-Till Corn1","authors":"R. H. Fox, L. D. Hoffman","doi":"10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050032x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing use of no-till crop production with urea based N fertilizers in the Northeast makes it imperative that we obtain a more quantitative understanding of both the magnitude of apparent NH<sub>3</sub> losses from nonincorporated urea fertilizers in the field and of the factors that contribute to those losses. A 4-year field study was conducted on a Murrill silt loam (Typic Hapludult) to compare the yields and N uptake by no-till corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) receiving five rates of broadcast, unincorporated N (0 to 202 kg/ha) as NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>, urea, urea-NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> solution (UAN), or (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The effects of these sources on the soil pH of the 0 to 2.5 cm and 0 to 17 cm layers and on the lime requirement (LR) in the 0 to 17 cm layer were also measured. In 2 of the 4 years, either urea, UAN, or both produced signifcantly lower yields and N uptake than the non-urea sources at the higher (101 and 202 kg/ha) N rates. Apparent N volatilization losses ranged from 0 to 35%. Comparing the results from this experiment with those from other field experiments reported in the literature where the effect of rainfall after N application on apparent N volatilization losses could be measured showed that the following observations applied to all: (1) there was insignificant NH<sub>3</sub>, volatilization loss from unincorporated urea fertilizers if at least 10 mm of rain fell within 48 hours after fertilizer application; (2) if 10 mm or more rain fell 3 days after the urea was applied, volatilization losses were slight (<10%); (3) if 3 to 5 mm of rain fell within 5 days, or 7 to 9 mm within 9 days, volatilization losses could be moderate (10 to 30%); and (4) if no rain fell within 6 days, the loss could be substantial (>30%).</p><p>The pH in the surface 2.5 cm of soil in the plots receiving 202 kg/ha/year of N as NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> urea, or UAN for 5 years was approximately 5.7 or one unit below that in the check. In the plots receiving this rate of (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, the soil pH in the 0 to 2.5 cm layer was 4.7. As expected, the 101 kg N/ha/year rate produced half was much lowering of pH as the 202 kg/ha rate.</p><p>Lime requirement measurements in the surface 17 cm of soil receiving 202 kg N/ha/year for 5 years indicated that approximately 67% of the acidity theoretically produced in the nitrification of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> remained to be neutralized with the less acidifying sources (NH<sub>4</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, urea, and UAN) and that approximately 100% of that from (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> required neutralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"73 5","pages":"891-895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050032x","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050032x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67
Abstract
The increasing use of no-till crop production with urea based N fertilizers in the Northeast makes it imperative that we obtain a more quantitative understanding of both the magnitude of apparent NH3 losses from nonincorporated urea fertilizers in the field and of the factors that contribute to those losses. A 4-year field study was conducted on a Murrill silt loam (Typic Hapludult) to compare the yields and N uptake by no-till corn (Zea mays L.) receiving five rates of broadcast, unincorporated N (0 to 202 kg/ha) as NH4NO3, urea, urea-NH4NO3 solution (UAN), or (NH4)2SO4. The effects of these sources on the soil pH of the 0 to 2.5 cm and 0 to 17 cm layers and on the lime requirement (LR) in the 0 to 17 cm layer were also measured. In 2 of the 4 years, either urea, UAN, or both produced signifcantly lower yields and N uptake than the non-urea sources at the higher (101 and 202 kg/ha) N rates. Apparent N volatilization losses ranged from 0 to 35%. Comparing the results from this experiment with those from other field experiments reported in the literature where the effect of rainfall after N application on apparent N volatilization losses could be measured showed that the following observations applied to all: (1) there was insignificant NH3, volatilization loss from unincorporated urea fertilizers if at least 10 mm of rain fell within 48 hours after fertilizer application; (2) if 10 mm or more rain fell 3 days after the urea was applied, volatilization losses were slight (<10%); (3) if 3 to 5 mm of rain fell within 5 days, or 7 to 9 mm within 9 days, volatilization losses could be moderate (10 to 30%); and (4) if no rain fell within 6 days, the loss could be substantial (>30%).
The pH in the surface 2.5 cm of soil in the plots receiving 202 kg/ha/year of N as NH4NO3 urea, or UAN for 5 years was approximately 5.7 or one unit below that in the check. In the plots receiving this rate of (NH4)2SO4, the soil pH in the 0 to 2.5 cm layer was 4.7. As expected, the 101 kg N/ha/year rate produced half was much lowering of pH as the 202 kg/ha rate.
Lime requirement measurements in the surface 17 cm of soil receiving 202 kg N/ha/year for 5 years indicated that approximately 67% of the acidity theoretically produced in the nitrification of NH4+ remained to be neutralized with the less acidifying sources (NH4O3, urea, and UAN) and that approximately 100% of that from (NH4)2SO4 required neutralization.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.