Vaccination of premature newborns: real clinical practice

P. Khodkevich, K. V. Kulikova, I. Deev, O. S. Fedorova, E. S. Kulikov
{"title":"Vaccination of premature newborns: real clinical practice","authors":"P. Khodkevich, K. V. Kulikova, I. Deev, O. S. Fedorova, E. S. Kulikov","doi":"10.20953/1729-9225-2022-3-50-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To analyze the vaccination coverage and adherence to the vaccination schedule among premature newborns with a birthweight of <2,500 g. Patients and methods. This study included 119 children aged 5 to 6 years followed up within the \"National prospective multicenter cohort study of newborns\" in Tomsk. The experimental group comprised 96 children born prematurely, including 36 low-birthweight (LBW), 25 very low-birthweight (VLBW), and 36 extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) children. The control group included 23 healthy children born full-term. We analyzed their clinical data and information on vaccination. Results. The number of children who had completed their vaccination by the age of 5 years varied across the groups: 34.8% of controls; 16.7% of LBW children; 28% of VLBW children; and 17.1% of ELBW children (p > 0.05). Thirteen percent of controls and 5.6% of LBW children were timely vaccinated, whereas none of the VLBW and ELBW children had their vaccination in time. We observed no differences in the vaccination profiles (types of administered vaccines) between the VLBW children and controls; vaccination profiles of the LBW and ELBW children were similar. ELBW children were less likely to be vaccinated against tuberculosis, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, and polio than controls (p < 0.01). None of the ELBW children received vaccines against hepatitis B, pertussis, diphtheria, and tetanus, as well as third vaccine against polio at birth. In the rest of the groups, the proportion of timely vaccinated children did not exceed 20%. Parents in the control group were less likely to refuse vaccination for their children than those in the experimental group. Non-adherence to the vaccination schedule was more common in the LBW children. VLBW and ELBW children had medical exemptions more frequently than LBW children and controls. Conclusion. We observed low vaccination coverage among premature newborns for all vaccines caused both by medical exemption and non-adherence to the vaccination schedule. Key words: vaccination, premature newborns, extremely low birth weight","PeriodicalId":37794,"journal":{"name":"Infektsionnye Bolezni","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infektsionnye Bolezni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20953/1729-9225-2022-3-50-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the vaccination coverage and adherence to the vaccination schedule among premature newborns with a birthweight of <2,500 g. Patients and methods. This study included 119 children aged 5 to 6 years followed up within the "National prospective multicenter cohort study of newborns" in Tomsk. The experimental group comprised 96 children born prematurely, including 36 low-birthweight (LBW), 25 very low-birthweight (VLBW), and 36 extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) children. The control group included 23 healthy children born full-term. We analyzed their clinical data and information on vaccination. Results. The number of children who had completed their vaccination by the age of 5 years varied across the groups: 34.8% of controls; 16.7% of LBW children; 28% of VLBW children; and 17.1% of ELBW children (p > 0.05). Thirteen percent of controls and 5.6% of LBW children were timely vaccinated, whereas none of the VLBW and ELBW children had their vaccination in time. We observed no differences in the vaccination profiles (types of administered vaccines) between the VLBW children and controls; vaccination profiles of the LBW and ELBW children were similar. ELBW children were less likely to be vaccinated against tuberculosis, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, and polio than controls (p < 0.01). None of the ELBW children received vaccines against hepatitis B, pertussis, diphtheria, and tetanus, as well as third vaccine against polio at birth. In the rest of the groups, the proportion of timely vaccinated children did not exceed 20%. Parents in the control group were less likely to refuse vaccination for their children than those in the experimental group. Non-adherence to the vaccination schedule was more common in the LBW children. VLBW and ELBW children had medical exemptions more frequently than LBW children and controls. Conclusion. We observed low vaccination coverage among premature newborns for all vaccines caused both by medical exemption and non-adherence to the vaccination schedule. Key words: vaccination, premature newborns, extremely low birth weight
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿疫苗接种:真实的临床实践
目标。目的:分析出生体重为0.05的早产儿的疫苗接种率和疫苗接种计划的依从性。13%的对照组和5.6%的低体重儿童及时接种了疫苗,而低体重儿童和低体重儿童均未及时接种疫苗。我们观察到VLBW儿童和对照组之间的疫苗接种情况(接种疫苗的类型)没有差异;LBW和ELBW儿童的疫苗接种情况相似。与对照组相比,ELBW儿童接种结核病、百日咳、白喉、破伤风和脊髓灰质炎疫苗的可能性更低(p < 0.01)。在出生时,没有一个儿童接种过乙型肝炎、百日咳、白喉和破伤风疫苗,也没有接种过第三种脊髓灰质炎疫苗。在其余各组中,及时接种疫苗的儿童比例不超过20%。对照组的父母拒绝给孩子接种疫苗的可能性低于实验组的父母。不遵守疫苗接种计划在低体重儿童中更为常见。与低体重儿童和对照组相比,低体重儿童和低体重儿童获得医疗豁免的频率更高。结论。我们观察到,由于医疗豁免和不遵守疫苗接种计划,早产新生儿的所有疫苗接种覆盖率较低。关键词:疫苗接种,早产儿,极低出生体重
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infektsionnye Bolezni
Infektsionnye Bolezni Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research works, reviews of literature, lectures, methodological recommendations, clinical observations. Main topics: problems of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations of infectious diseases, new techniques and methods of their diagnosis, prevention and treatment; special attention is paid to the problems of antibacterial and antiviral therapy, the use of immunoglobulins and interferons, and also to intensive therapy of critical states. The journal is in the List of leading scientific journals and periodicals of the Supreme Attestation Committee, where the principal results of doctoral dissertations should be published.
期刊最新文献
Innovative approaches to treatment of human herpesvirus infections during the COVID-19 pandemic Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in a six-year-old child Viral infections as a cause or a trigger for the development of hemoblastosis? Antiviral therapy experience in patients with chronic hepatitis D and decompensated cirrhosis Treatment of patients with chronic HDV infection: routine clinical practice in the Moscow region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1