Whose Music is it Anyway? How we Came to View Musical Expression as a Form of Property

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW University of Cincinnati Law Review Pub Date : 2003-12-08 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.477162
Michael W. Carroll
{"title":"Whose Music is it Anyway? How we Came to View Musical Expression as a Form of Property","authors":"Michael W. Carroll","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.477162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many participants in the music industry consider unauthorized transmissions of music files over the Internet to be theft of their property. Many Internet users who exchange music files reject this characterization. Prompted by the dispute over unauthorized music distribution, this Article explores how those who create and distribute music first came to look upon music as their property and when in Western history the law first supported this view. By analyzing the economic and legal structures governing music making in Western Europe from the classical period in Greece through the Renaissance, the Article shows that the law first granted some exclusive rights in the Middle Ages, when musicians' guilds enjoyed the exclusive right to perform music in medieval cities, but that the concept of music as a form of property was not established until early music publishers received exclusive rights in their publications during the Renaissance. The Article concludes with thoughts about how this history should influence the way we address the current controversy concerning uses of music on the Internet.","PeriodicalId":45537,"journal":{"name":"University of Cincinnati Law Review","volume":"29 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Cincinnati Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.477162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Many participants in the music industry consider unauthorized transmissions of music files over the Internet to be theft of their property. Many Internet users who exchange music files reject this characterization. Prompted by the dispute over unauthorized music distribution, this Article explores how those who create and distribute music first came to look upon music as their property and when in Western history the law first supported this view. By analyzing the economic and legal structures governing music making in Western Europe from the classical period in Greece through the Renaissance, the Article shows that the law first granted some exclusive rights in the Middle Ages, when musicians' guilds enjoyed the exclusive right to perform music in medieval cities, but that the concept of music as a form of property was not established until early music publishers received exclusive rights in their publications during the Renaissance. The Article concludes with thoughts about how this history should influence the way we address the current controversy concerning uses of music on the Internet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这到底是谁的音乐?我们是如何将音乐表达视为一种财产形式的
许多音乐行业的参与者认为未经授权在互联网上传输音乐文件是对他们财产的盗窃。许多交换音乐文件的互联网用户不同意这种说法。在未经授权的音乐发行争议的推动下,本文探讨了那些创作和发行音乐的人是如何首先将音乐视为他们的财产的,以及在西方历史上法律何时首次支持这一观点。通过分析从希腊古典时期到文艺复兴时期统治西欧音乐制作的经济和法律结构,文章表明,法律首先在中世纪授予一些专有权,当时音乐家行会享有在中世纪城市演奏音乐的专有权,但音乐作为一种财产形式的概念直到文艺复兴时期早期音乐出版商在其出版物中获得专有权才建立起来。这篇文章总结了这段历史应该如何影响我们处理当前关于互联网上音乐使用的争议的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The University of Cincinnati Law Review is a quarterly publication produced by second and third-year law students. The Review, along with its counterparts at all other accredited law schools, makes a significant contribution to scholarly legal literature. In addition, the Review represents the College of Law to the outside community. Each year, approximately 30 students are invited to join the Law Review as Associate Members. All Associate Members are chosen on the basis of first year grade point average combined with a writing competition score. The competition begins immediately after completion of first year studies.
期刊最新文献
The Need for a Lenient Admissibility Standard for Defense Forensic Evidence Law’s Enterprise: Argumentation Schemes & Legal Analogy State Civil Rights Remedies for Gender Violence: a Tool for Accountability Political Discrimination by Private Employers Benefit Corporation Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1