Methodologies Used to Determine Mergers and Acquisitions’ Performance

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal Pub Date : 2012-07-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1803922
Madhvi Sethi, Dipali Krishnakumar
{"title":"Methodologies Used to Determine Mergers and Acquisitions’ Performance","authors":"Madhvi Sethi, Dipali Krishnakumar","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1803922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, several studies have been done by researchers and practitioners to understand the significance of adopting Mergers & Acquisitions (MA identify the most popular methods; their limitations and benefits; and analyze whether research conclusions differ depending upon the method used to measure performance. We also research whether methods used in emerging markets such as India differ from those typically used in the developed markets. We find that internationally event studies dominate acquisition performance research; while research on Indian acquisitions has primarily been based on accounting returns. There are a few other methods such as data envelopment analysis and balanced score card methods which warrant further research and inclusion in MA which is an important factor for researchers and practitioners to consider while drawing conclusions on acquisition success or failure. We recommend that the method of evaluation should be based on the country of study, and more significantly the aspect under examination i.e. profitability, stock market perception or efficiency. Our contribution to the present body of knowledge is to suggest that methods of evaluation used in developed markets may not work in emerging markets and that method selection can influence research conclusions.","PeriodicalId":39296,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1803922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Over the years, several studies have been done by researchers and practitioners to understand the significance of adopting Mergers & Acquisitions (MA identify the most popular methods; their limitations and benefits; and analyze whether research conclusions differ depending upon the method used to measure performance. We also research whether methods used in emerging markets such as India differ from those typically used in the developed markets. We find that internationally event studies dominate acquisition performance research; while research on Indian acquisitions has primarily been based on accounting returns. There are a few other methods such as data envelopment analysis and balanced score card methods which warrant further research and inclusion in MA which is an important factor for researchers and practitioners to consider while drawing conclusions on acquisition success or failure. We recommend that the method of evaluation should be based on the country of study, and more significantly the aspect under examination i.e. profitability, stock market perception or efficiency. Our contribution to the present body of knowledge is to suggest that methods of evaluation used in developed markets may not work in emerging markets and that method selection can influence research conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于确定并购绩效的方法
多年来,研究人员和从业人员进行了几项研究,以了解采用并购的重要性(MA确定最流行的方法;它们的局限性和优点;并分析研究结论是否因绩效衡量方法的不同而不同。我们还研究了印度等新兴市场使用的方法是否与发达市场通常使用的方法不同。我们发现,国际上的事件研究主导了收购绩效研究;而对印度并购的研究主要基于会计回报。还有一些其他方法,如数据包络分析和平衡计分卡方法,值得进一步研究和纳入MA,这是研究人员和从业人员在得出收购成功或失败结论时考虑的重要因素。我们建议评估的方法应该基于研究的国家,更重要的是评估的方面,即盈利能力,股票市场感知或效率。我们对现有知识体系的贡献是提出,发达市场中使用的评估方法可能不适用于新兴市场,方法选择可能影响研究结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal
Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal (AAFSJ) is a professional periodical that offers open access forum to publish the latest and most relevant research innovations in this field. Affiliated to the Allied Academy publications, the journal adheres to double blind peer review to ensure the originality and quality of the publication.
期刊最新文献
Cryptography in Financial Markets: Potential Channels for Future Financial Stability Does Book-Tax Difference Influence the Value Relevance of Book Income? Empirical Evidence from Japan Timely Loss Recognition, Agency Costs and the Cash Flow Sensitivity of Firm Investment Methodologies Used to Determine Mergers and Acquisitions’ Performance Goodwill Impairment: A Comparative Country Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1