Predatory Publishing: How Not To Fall Prey

C. Arthur
{"title":"Predatory Publishing: How Not To Fall Prey","authors":"C. Arthur","doi":"10.21061/VALIB.V61I1.1327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of gold open access journals, freely available journals sometimes supported by article processing charges, has steadily increased over the past decade. According to a recent report roughly eight percent of journals with impact factors are open access. With hundreds of identified existing predatory publishing companies, it is difficult to fault our teaching partners and/or students if they fall for a predatory publisher’s solicitation. Academic librarians are arguably any campus’ best-suited guides to the quickly changing academic publishing landscape and have much to gain from leading the discussion. Library sponsored workshops on open access publishing opportunities and hazards provide an excellent opportunity to further strengthen outreach to both faculty and graduate students. While open access publishing opportunities cannot be described as a simple duality, there are definite indicators that an opportunity may not be what it claims. Librarians must consider the nuance and grey area of academic publishing as the models of publishing continue to evolve. This article will (re)familiarize librarians with helpful tools that empower us to serve as effective advocates for members of our campus communities as they evaluate options for publishing their research.","PeriodicalId":29991,"journal":{"name":"Virginia Libraries","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/VALIB.V61I1.1327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The number of gold open access journals, freely available journals sometimes supported by article processing charges, has steadily increased over the past decade. According to a recent report roughly eight percent of journals with impact factors are open access. With hundreds of identified existing predatory publishing companies, it is difficult to fault our teaching partners and/or students if they fall for a predatory publisher’s solicitation. Academic librarians are arguably any campus’ best-suited guides to the quickly changing academic publishing landscape and have much to gain from leading the discussion. Library sponsored workshops on open access publishing opportunities and hazards provide an excellent opportunity to further strengthen outreach to both faculty and graduate students. While open access publishing opportunities cannot be described as a simple duality, there are definite indicators that an opportunity may not be what it claims. Librarians must consider the nuance and grey area of academic publishing as the models of publishing continue to evolve. This article will (re)familiarize librarians with helpful tools that empower us to serve as effective advocates for members of our campus communities as they evaluate options for publishing their research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掠夺性出版:如何不沦为牺牲品
黄金开放获取期刊(有时由文章处理费支持的免费期刊)的数量在过去十年中稳步增长。根据最近的一份报告,大约8%具有影响因子的期刊是开放获取的。目前已有数百家掠夺性出版公司,如果我们的教学合作伙伴和/或学生被掠夺性出版商的引诱所欺骗,我们很难责怪他们。学术图书馆员可以说是任何校园里快速变化的学术出版领域最合适的向导,并且从引导讨论中获益良多。图书馆主办的关于开放获取出版机会和危害的研讨会为进一步加强与教师和研究生的联系提供了一个极好的机会。虽然开放获取出版机会不能简单地用二元性来描述,但有一些明确的指标表明,一个机会可能并不像它声称的那样。随着出版模式的不断发展,图书馆员必须考虑学术出版的细微差别和灰色地带。本文将(重新)让图书馆员熟悉一些有用的工具,这些工具使我们能够在校园社区成员评估发表研究成果的选择时,有效地为他们服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Reconstruction of Mandible Defects in War Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Science of the Cover Letter: How to Apply for an Academic Librarian Job Orientation: Laying Out the Welcome Mat (or Not) for New Employees Upgraded and Grounded: Alexandria Library’s Experience in the ALA Pilot Program, Resilient Communities Charting a Course: Volume 66 of Virginia Libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1