INTESTINAL DYSBIOSIS, HUMAN HEALTH AND FUNCTIONAL NUTRITION

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Teoria i Praktika Pererabotki Masa Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.21323/2414-438X-2017-2-4-44-61
I. Chicherin, I. Pogorelsky, I. Lundovskikh, I. V. Darmov, M. R. Shabalina
{"title":"INTESTINAL DYSBIOSIS, HUMAN HEALTH AND FUNCTIONAL NUTRITION","authors":"I. Chicherin, I. Pogorelsky, I. Lundovskikh, I. V. Darmov, M. R. Shabalina","doi":"10.21323/2414-438X-2017-2-4-44-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interest of scientists, physicians, pediatricians, general practitioners to the problem of intestinal dysbiosis is caused by the fact that there are very close relations between the intestinal microbiocenosis disorders and organic and functional pathology not only of the gastrointestinal tract, but also of other organs. For more than 50 years probiotics have been the leading tool for correction of intestinal microbiocenosis. However, the response of intestinal microbiota to exogenous intake of probiotics is variable, or is completely absent. The article presents the analysis of the literature data and results of our own experimental studies on human volunteers, fully confirming previous findings on laboratory animals, according to which the probiotic microorganisms are foreign and do not survive in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals, and their interaction with the host organism has the character of «host against probiotic». The results of the comparative study on the effectiveness of 18 modern preparations for correction of intestinal microbiocenosis at antibiotic-associated dysbiosis in experiments on animals are given. The comparative experimental research on the effectiveness of modern preparations that are frequently used in clinical practice as well as recent innovative commercial and experimental preparations (Actoflor-C. Stimbifid plus, Stimex) regarding intestinal microbiota recovery at antibioticassociated dysbiosis in conventional white mice was carried out. IgorYu. Chicherin1, Ivan P. Pogorelsky2, Irina A. Lundovskikh2, IlyaV. Darmov2, Marina R. Shabalina2 1 Scientific society «Microbiota», Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russia 2 Vyatka State University, Kirov, Russia УДК/UDC 621.3 DOI 10.21323/2414–438X-2017–2–4-44-61 Для цитирования: Чичерин и.Ю., Погорельский и.П., лундовских и.а., Дармов и.в., Шабалина М.р. Дисбиоз кишечника, здоровье человека и функциональное питание. Теория и практика переработки мяса. 2017; 2(4):44-61. DOI:10.21323/2414– 438X-2017–2–4–44-61 FOr cItatIOn: chicherin I.Yu., Pogorelsky I.P., Lundovskikh I.a., Darmov I.V., Shabalina M.r. Intestinal dysbiosis, human health and functional nutrition. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2017;2(4):44-61. (In russ.) DOI:10.21323/2414–438X-2017–2–4–44-61 Чичерин И.Ю. 1, Погорельский И.П. 2, Лундовских И.А.2, Дармов И.В.2, Шабалина М.Р.2 1 Научное общество «Микробиота», Сергиев Посад, Московская область, Россия 2 Вятский государственный университет, Киров, Россия","PeriodicalId":31267,"journal":{"name":"Teoria i Praktika Pererabotki Masa","volume":"2 1","pages":"44-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria i Praktika Pererabotki Masa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2017-2-4-44-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interest of scientists, physicians, pediatricians, general practitioners to the problem of intestinal dysbiosis is caused by the fact that there are very close relations between the intestinal microbiocenosis disorders and organic and functional pathology not only of the gastrointestinal tract, but also of other organs. For more than 50 years probiotics have been the leading tool for correction of intestinal microbiocenosis. However, the response of intestinal microbiota to exogenous intake of probiotics is variable, or is completely absent. The article presents the analysis of the literature data and results of our own experimental studies on human volunteers, fully confirming previous findings on laboratory animals, according to which the probiotic microorganisms are foreign and do not survive in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals, and their interaction with the host organism has the character of «host against probiotic». The results of the comparative study on the effectiveness of 18 modern preparations for correction of intestinal microbiocenosis at antibiotic-associated dysbiosis in experiments on animals are given. The comparative experimental research on the effectiveness of modern preparations that are frequently used in clinical practice as well as recent innovative commercial and experimental preparations (Actoflor-C. Stimbifid plus, Stimex) regarding intestinal microbiota recovery at antibioticassociated dysbiosis in conventional white mice was carried out. IgorYu. Chicherin1, Ivan P. Pogorelsky2, Irina A. Lundovskikh2, IlyaV. Darmov2, Marina R. Shabalina2 1 Scientific society «Microbiota», Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russia 2 Vyatka State University, Kirov, Russia УДК/UDC 621.3 DOI 10.21323/2414–438X-2017–2–4-44-61 Для цитирования: Чичерин и.Ю., Погорельский и.П., лундовских и.а., Дармов и.в., Шабалина М.р. Дисбиоз кишечника, здоровье человека и функциональное питание. Теория и практика переработки мяса. 2017; 2(4):44-61. DOI:10.21323/2414– 438X-2017–2–4–44-61 FOr cItatIOn: chicherin I.Yu., Pogorelsky I.P., Lundovskikh I.a., Darmov I.V., Shabalina M.r. Intestinal dysbiosis, human health and functional nutrition. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2017;2(4):44-61. (In russ.) DOI:10.21323/2414–438X-2017–2–4–44-61 Чичерин И.Ю. 1, Погорельский И.П. 2, Лундовских И.А.2, Дармов И.В.2, Шабалина М.Р.2 1 Научное общество «Микробиота», Сергиев Посад, Московская область, Россия 2 Вятский государственный университет, Киров, Россия
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道失调,人体健康和功能性营养
科学家、医生、儿科医生、全科医生对肠道生态失调问题的兴趣是由于肠道微生物病不仅与胃肠道的有机和功能病理有非常密切的关系,而且与其他器官的有机和功能病理也有密切的关系。50多年来,益生菌一直是纠正肠道微生物病的主要工具。然而,肠道菌群对外源性益生菌摄入的反应是可变的,或者完全不存在。本文分析了文献资料和我们自己对人类志愿者的实验研究结果,充分证实了以前在实验动物上的发现,根据益生菌微生物是外来的,在人类和动物的胃肠道中不生存,它们与宿主生物的相互作用具有“宿主对抗益生菌”的特征。本文给出了18种现代制剂在动物实验中纠正抗生素相关生态失调的肠道微生物病的效果的比较研究结果。对临床实践中经常使用的现代制剂以及最近创新的商业和实验制剂(actoflorc)的有效性进行比较实验研究。对常规小白鼠在抗生素相关生态失调时肠道菌群恢复情况进行了Stimbifid + (Stimex)研究。IgorYu。齐杰林1,Ivan P. Pogorelsky2, Irina A. Lundovskikh2, IlyaV。Darmov2, Marina R. shabalin2 1俄罗斯莫斯科地区Sergiev Posad科学学会«Microbiota»2俄罗斯基洛夫维亚特卡国立大学УДК/UDC 621.3 DOI 10.21323/2414-438X-2017-2-4-44-61 Для цитирования: Чичерин и.Ю。, Погорельский и.П。, лундовских и.а。, Дармов и.в。, Шабалина М.р。Дисбиозкишечника,здоровьечеловекаифункциональноепитание。Теория * практика переработки мяса。2017;2(4): 44 - 61。DOI:10.21323/2414 - 438X-2017-2-4-44-61引文来源:chicherin i.u yu。[3],李建军,李建军,李建军。肠道生态失调,人体健康与功能性营养。肉类加工理论与实践。2017; 2(4): 44 - 61。(俄国人)。DOI: 10.21323 / 2414 - 438 x - 2017 - 2 - 4 - 44 - 61ЧичеринИЮ。1、Погорельский И.П。2、Лундовских И.А。2、Дармов И.В。2、Шабалина М.Р。2 1Научноеобщество«Микробиота»,СергиевПосад,Московскаяобласть,Россия2Вятскийгосударственныйуниверситет,Киров,Россия
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Study of the process of the frozen raw beef defrosting with its simultaneous massaging in industrial conditions Nonparametric statistics. Part 3. Correlation coefficients Microalgae as alternative proteins for the sustainable food industry: A review Investigation of the chemical composition, physicochemical properties, and microstructure of meat patties with amaranth flour The effect of magnetic and electric fields on the processes of food freezing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1