{"title":"Famine in the Kazak ASSR in the 1930s: A Historiographical Drift","authors":"G. Kornilov","doi":"10.21638/spbu24.2023.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The famine in the USSR in the early 1930s as a historical fact has been the focus of scholarly journals over last 30 years; the media are especially active in Ukraine and Kazakhstan. The article analyzes historiography of famine in Kazakhstan by Kazakh and foreign (Russian, Ukrainian, American, Italian and German) scholars. A noticeable increase in special publication activity took place in the first half of the 1990s; a new surge of interest in the topic emerged in the 2010s, especially among Western European and American historians. In Kazakhstan, it continues to this day and is increasingly acquiring a political connotation. Some Kazakh historians interpret asharshylyk (famine in Kazakh) as famine, that is, following the Ukrainian interpretation of famine as genocide, ethnocide of the Kazakh people. Such publications are characterized by the neglect of available historical documents on the topic and a descriptive method of research, when the main emphasis is placed on suffering of the starving people. The article focuses on the analysis of three debatable issues: the time of the famine, losses in manpower, and mass resettlement of the population. Currently in historiography there are different interpretations of the chronological framework; the scale of the catastrophe; various estimations of the losses and population migration (migration, as a result of sedentarization and collectivization) in the Autonomous Republic under conditions of famine; there is no clear definition of the geography of famine. The article attributes it to different methodological approaches. The greatest results in the study of the topic can be obtained by means of approaches proposed by the Russian researcher P. A. Sorokin and the Irish scholar Komrak O’Grad. Further research is impossible without a thorough study of the already published documents and expanding the source base.","PeriodicalId":53957,"journal":{"name":"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2023.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The famine in the USSR in the early 1930s as a historical fact has been the focus of scholarly journals over last 30 years; the media are especially active in Ukraine and Kazakhstan. The article analyzes historiography of famine in Kazakhstan by Kazakh and foreign (Russian, Ukrainian, American, Italian and German) scholars. A noticeable increase in special publication activity took place in the first half of the 1990s; a new surge of interest in the topic emerged in the 2010s, especially among Western European and American historians. In Kazakhstan, it continues to this day and is increasingly acquiring a political connotation. Some Kazakh historians interpret asharshylyk (famine in Kazakh) as famine, that is, following the Ukrainian interpretation of famine as genocide, ethnocide of the Kazakh people. Such publications are characterized by the neglect of available historical documents on the topic and a descriptive method of research, when the main emphasis is placed on suffering of the starving people. The article focuses on the analysis of three debatable issues: the time of the famine, losses in manpower, and mass resettlement of the population. Currently in historiography there are different interpretations of the chronological framework; the scale of the catastrophe; various estimations of the losses and population migration (migration, as a result of sedentarization and collectivization) in the Autonomous Republic under conditions of famine; there is no clear definition of the geography of famine. The article attributes it to different methodological approaches. The greatest results in the study of the topic can be obtained by means of approaches proposed by the Russian researcher P. A. Sorokin and the Irish scholar Komrak O’Grad. Further research is impossible without a thorough study of the already published documents and expanding the source base.
20世纪30年代初发生在苏联的饥荒作为一个历史事实,是近30年来学术期刊关注的焦点;媒体在乌克兰和哈萨克斯坦尤其活跃。本文分析了哈萨克斯坦和国外(俄罗斯、乌克兰、美国、意大利和德国)学者对哈萨克斯坦饥荒的史学研究。1990年代前半期特别出版活动显著增加;2010年代,人们对这一话题的兴趣再次高涨,尤其是在西欧和美国的历史学家中。在哈萨克斯坦,它一直延续到今天,并越来越多地获得政治内涵。一些哈萨克历史学家将asharshylyk(哈萨克语的饥荒)解释为饥荒,也就是说,遵循乌克兰人对饥荒的解释,即对哈萨克人的种族灭绝。这类出版物的特点是,当主要强调饥饿人民的苦难时,忽视了关于这一主题的现有历史文件和描述性的研究方法。本文重点分析了三个有争议的问题:饥荒的时间、人力的损失和人口的大规模安置。目前在史学中,对时间框架有不同的解释;灾难的规模;对饥荒条件下自治共和国的损失和人口迁移(由于定居化和集体化造成的迁移)的各种估计;对饥荒的地理分布没有明确的定义。文章将其归因于不同的方法论方法。通过俄罗斯研究员p.a.索罗金和爱尔兰学者Komrak O 'Grad提出的方法,可以获得该主题研究的最大成果。如果没有对已经发表的文献进行彻底的研究和扩大来源基础,进一步的研究是不可能的。