Kolorektal lateral yayılımlı tümörlerde başarısız endoskopik mukozal rezeksiyon sonrası endoskopik submukozal diseksiyonun uygulanabilirliği: tek merkez deneyimi

Abdullah Murat Buyruk, Ayten Livaoğlu, Aydın Aktaş
{"title":"Kolorektal lateral yayılımlı tümörlerde başarısız endoskopik mukozal rezeksiyon sonrası endoskopik submukozal diseksiyonun uygulanabilirliği: tek merkez deneyimi","authors":"Abdullah Murat Buyruk, Ayten Livaoğlu, Aydın Aktaş","doi":"10.19161/etd.1125260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Endoscopic mucosal resection might technically be unsuccessful (interrupted endoscopic mucosal resection) in some cases when treating large colorectal laterally spreading tumors. In the literature, data on the outcomes of the endoscopic submucosal dissection method in endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted tumors are lacking. In this study, we evaluated the results of patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted laterally spreading tumors. \nMaterials and Methods: Between February 2019 and April 2021, 8 patients with endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted colorectal laterally spreading tumors underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection. The primary endpoint was en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection. \nResults: In all cases, endoscopic submucosal dissection was successfully completed. The mean tumor size was 61.5 mm (35–100 mm). The rate of en bloc resection, R0 resection and curative resection was 100%, 87.5% and 87.5% respectively. Intra-procedural perforation occurred in 1 patient (12.5%) and was successfully treated with clip application. Delayed bleeding occurred in 1 patient (12.5%), and was successfully treated with endoluminal hemostasis. Furthermore, histopathological examination revealed that laterally spreading tumors in 4 patients (50.0%) had submucosal invasion. Surgical resection was performed after endoscopic submucosal dissection in 1 patient owing to the presence of deep submucosal invasion. \nConclusion: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and relatively safe method in endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted colorectal laterally spreading tumors.","PeriodicalId":32499,"journal":{"name":"Ege Tip Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ege Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1125260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Endoscopic mucosal resection might technically be unsuccessful (interrupted endoscopic mucosal resection) in some cases when treating large colorectal laterally spreading tumors. In the literature, data on the outcomes of the endoscopic submucosal dissection method in endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted tumors are lacking. In this study, we evaluated the results of patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted laterally spreading tumors. Materials and Methods: Between February 2019 and April 2021, 8 patients with endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted colorectal laterally spreading tumors underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection. The primary endpoint was en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Results: In all cases, endoscopic submucosal dissection was successfully completed. The mean tumor size was 61.5 mm (35–100 mm). The rate of en bloc resection, R0 resection and curative resection was 100%, 87.5% and 87.5% respectively. Intra-procedural perforation occurred in 1 patient (12.5%) and was successfully treated with clip application. Delayed bleeding occurred in 1 patient (12.5%), and was successfully treated with endoluminal hemostasis. Furthermore, histopathological examination revealed that laterally spreading tumors in 4 patients (50.0%) had submucosal invasion. Surgical resection was performed after endoscopic submucosal dissection in 1 patient owing to the presence of deep submucosal invasion. Conclusion: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and relatively safe method in endoscopic mucosal resection interrupted colorectal laterally spreading tumors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结肠直肠侧肿瘤内镜下黏膜残留不成功后内镜下肌下阅读障碍的有效性:一项中心实验
目的:内镜下粘膜切除术在某些情况下可能在技术上不成功(内镜下粘膜切除术中断)。在文献中,缺乏关于内镜下粘膜夹层法在内镜下粘膜切除中断性肿瘤中的结果的数据。在这项研究中,我们评估了接受内镜下粘膜夹层切除术的患者的结果,内镜下粘膜切除术阻断了肿瘤的横向扩散。材料与方法:2019年2月至2021年4月,对8例内镜下粘膜切除术中断性结直肠侧散性肿瘤患者进行内镜下粘膜下剥离。主要终点是整体、R0和内镜下粘膜下夹层的治愈率。结果:所有病例均成功完成内镜下粘膜剥离。肿瘤平均大小为61.5 mm (35 ~ 100 mm)。整体切除率为100%,R0切除率为87.5%,根治切除率为87.5%。术中穿孔1例(12.5%),应用夹子成功治疗。迟发性出血1例(12.5%),经腔内止血治疗成功。此外,组织病理学检查显示4例(50.0%)患者的肿瘤有粘膜下浸润。1例患者因存在深部粘膜下浸润,经内镜下粘膜下剥离后行手术切除。结论:内镜下粘膜下夹层是内镜下切除结直肠侧散性肿瘤的一种有效且相对安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women's genital hygiene behaviors and the effect of these behaviors on vaginal infection Evaluation of intimate partner violence in pregnant women and determination of knowledge levels regarding precaution decisions on combating violence against women Dikkat eksikliği/hiperaktivite bozukluğu olan çocuklarda nöro-geribildirim uygulamasına bağlı davranış değişikliklerinin Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zekâ Ölçeği ile araştırılması: randomize tek körlü ön çalışma Acil servise başvuran yaşlı bireylerde bakım bağımlılığının kırılganlık düzeyine etkisi Previabl membran rüptürünün maternal ve perinatal sonuçları
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1