EVALUATION OF FOUR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PACKAGES FOR CONTROLLING MAIN PESTS OF COTTON IN RAINFED FIELDS

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science Pub Date : 2014-04-10 DOI:10.21082/IJAS.V15N1.2014.P1-10
N. Nurindah, D. Sunarto
{"title":"EVALUATION OF FOUR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PACKAGES FOR CONTROLLING MAIN PESTS OF COTTON IN RAINFED FIELDS","authors":"N. Nurindah, D. Sunarto","doi":"10.21082/IJAS.V15N1.2014.P1-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cotton production nationally is low due to various constraints, including pests. Two main pests commonly found in cotton plantation in rain fed fields are cotton leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula) and cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera). The study aimed to evaluate four packages of integrated pest management (IPM) techniques to control cotton leafhopper and cotton bollworm in rain fed fields. The experiment was conducted in farmers’ fields at Asembagus, East Java, between January and July 2012. Four packages of IPM evaluated were cotton varieties, i.e. Kanesia 10 or Kanesia 13, and seed treatment with synthetic insecticide (imidacloprid) before sowing or spraying molasses (10 ml L-1 water) as food for natural enemies. The cotton plants were intercropped with groundnut and sprayed with neem seed extract (NSE) at the action threshold level for pest control. These packages were compared among themselves and also with the methods usually used by farmers, i.e. planting cotton variety Kanesia 8 intercropped with groundnut and pest control using synthetic chemical insecticides. Twenty five plants were sampled randomly per plot and measured for their growth, leafhopper and  bollworm populations, as well as cotton seed yield per plot. Observations were made weekly, starting at 30 days after planting (DAP) until 120 DAP. The results showed that the use of Kanesia 10 or Kanesia 13 intercropped with groundnut and spraying molasses to conserve natural enemies was the best  pest management practice and superior to farmers’ practices. Conserving natural enemies is not only profitable (saving production cost of IDR1,150,000 to IDR1,500,000 ha-1 season-1), but also safe for the environment (no need to spray chemical insecticides).","PeriodicalId":13456,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21082/IJAS.V15N1.2014.P1-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cotton production nationally is low due to various constraints, including pests. Two main pests commonly found in cotton plantation in rain fed fields are cotton leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula) and cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera). The study aimed to evaluate four packages of integrated pest management (IPM) techniques to control cotton leafhopper and cotton bollworm in rain fed fields. The experiment was conducted in farmers’ fields at Asembagus, East Java, between January and July 2012. Four packages of IPM evaluated were cotton varieties, i.e. Kanesia 10 or Kanesia 13, and seed treatment with synthetic insecticide (imidacloprid) before sowing or spraying molasses (10 ml L-1 water) as food for natural enemies. The cotton plants were intercropped with groundnut and sprayed with neem seed extract (NSE) at the action threshold level for pest control. These packages were compared among themselves and also with the methods usually used by farmers, i.e. planting cotton variety Kanesia 8 intercropped with groundnut and pest control using synthetic chemical insecticides. Twenty five plants were sampled randomly per plot and measured for their growth, leafhopper and  bollworm populations, as well as cotton seed yield per plot. Observations were made weekly, starting at 30 days after planting (DAP) until 120 DAP. The results showed that the use of Kanesia 10 or Kanesia 13 intercropped with groundnut and spraying molasses to conserve natural enemies was the best  pest management practice and superior to farmers’ practices. Conserving natural enemies is not only profitable (saving production cost of IDR1,150,000 to IDR1,500,000 ha-1 season-1), but also safe for the environment (no need to spray chemical insecticides).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种综合防治方案对旱地棉花主要害虫的防治效果评价
由于各种限制因素,包括害虫,全国棉花产量很低。在旱作棉田中常见的两种主要害虫是棉叶蝉(Amrasca biguttula)和棉铃虫。本研究旨在评价4套害虫综合治理(IPM)技术在雨养棉田防治棉叶蝉和棉铃虫的效果。该试验于2012年1月至7月在东爪哇省Asembagus的农民田间进行。4个包装的IPM评价为棉花品种Kanesia 10或Kanesia 13,在播种前用合成杀虫剂(吡虫啉)处理种子或喷洒糖蜜(10 ml L-1水)作为天敌的食物。棉花间作花生,喷印楝籽提取物(NSE)防治害虫。这些包装之间进行了比较,并与农民通常使用的方法进行了比较,即种植棉花品种Kanesia 8间作花生和使用合成化学杀虫剂防治害虫。每小区随机取样25株,测定其生长情况、叶蝉和棉铃虫种群数量以及每小区棉籽产量。每周观察一次,从播种后30天(DAP)开始,一直观察到120 DAP。结果表明,以Kanesia 10或Kanesia 13间作花生和喷洒糖蜜防治天敌是最佳的防治措施,优于农民的做法。保护天敌不仅有利可图(每季可节约生产成本150 - 150万印尼盾),而且对环境安全(无需喷洒化学杀虫剂)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science
Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE EFFECT OF OZONATED WATER WASHING ON THE QUALITY OF HONEY PINEAPPLE PRESERVED AT ROOM TEMPERATURE AND IN THE OZONE COLD STORAGE TOLERANCE OF IRRIGATED LOWLAND RICE VARIETIES TO IRON TOXICITY UNDER NUTRIENT SOLUTION AS MEASURED BY A DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING IN VITRO EFFICACY OF DISPARATE FUNGICIDES AGAINST Lasiodiplodia theobromae ROOT ROTS OF ORANGE-FLESHED SWEET-POTATO VARIETIES DETERMINING THE EFFICIENCY OF NITROGEN FERTILIZERS ON MAIZE USING ISOTOPE METHODS AT DIFFERENT IRRIGATION LEVELS GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF ETHIOPIAN COMMERCIAL DURUM WHEAT (Triticum turgidum L.) CULTIVARS IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1