Why I Write (and Why I Think Law Professors Generally Should Write)

Y. Kamisar
{"title":"Why I Write (and Why I Think Law Professors Generally Should Write)","authors":"Y. Kamisar","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.829285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Looking back on forty-five years of law review writing, Professor Kamisar concludes that, to use George Orwell's words, he has been moved to write by \"a sense of injustice\" and the need to \"expose\" \"some lie,\" e.g., the lie that the trial judge or the prosecuting attorney can be counted on to protect the rights of unrepresented defendants. He maintains further that law professors generally should feel an obligation to write because they can think through and research exhaustively any and every problem they meet along the way without worrying about billable hours and they can do so \"under working conditions that thousands of busy, hurried practitioners would envy.\"","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"41 1","pages":"1747"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The San Diego law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.829285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Looking back on forty-five years of law review writing, Professor Kamisar concludes that, to use George Orwell's words, he has been moved to write by "a sense of injustice" and the need to "expose" "some lie," e.g., the lie that the trial judge or the prosecuting attorney can be counted on to protect the rights of unrepresented defendants. He maintains further that law professors generally should feel an obligation to write because they can think through and research exhaustively any and every problem they meet along the way without worrying about billable hours and they can do so "under working conditions that thousands of busy, hurried practitioners would envy."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我为什么写作(以及为什么我认为法学教授通常应该写作)
回顾45年的法律评论写作,卡米萨教授总结道,借用乔治·奥威尔的话,他被“一种不公正的感觉”和“揭露”“一些谎言”的需要所感动,例如,审判法官或检察官可以指望保护无代表被告的权利的谎言。他进一步认为,法学教授通常应该感到写作是一种义务,因为他们可以彻底思考和研究他们在写作过程中遇到的任何问题,而不必担心计费时间,他们可以在“成千上万忙碌匆忙的从业者羡慕的工作条件下”这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to 'How Foot Voting Enhances Political Freedom' Is There Hope for Change? The Evolution of Conceptions of 'Good' Corporate Governance Extending Miranda: Prohibition on Police Lies Regarding the Incriminating Evidence The Vindication of Good Over Evil: “Futile” Self-Defense The Case for Varying Standards of Proof
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1